Abstract
This article offers new theoretical and empirical insights into decision-making with regard to the domestication and incorporation of home energy efficiency (HEE) artefacts. These items, such as insulation and heating systems, are currently of high social, political and environmental importance. Researchers investigating energy consumption and related topics have recently turned to theories of practice — especially that proposed by Shove and colleagues — which treat humans as ‘carriers’. In contrast, this article uses realist social theory to afford a pivotal role to reflexivity in practice. Individual case studies, derived from in-depth interviews, are used to explore Archer's communicative, autonomous and meta-reflexive modes. And, at the same time, Archer's distinction between natural, practical and social orders of reality is used to show the importance of embodied and practical knowledge in HEE practices. As such, this article takes the theoretical focus in this research area beyond dispositions and attitudes, and argues that the way artefacts are domesticated in the course of householders’ pursuit of that which matters most to them may have significant social implications that contemporary forms of practice theory seem unable to account for. Sustainability policy, therefore, should be sensitive to the concerns of householders and the indispensability of reflexivity to home energy efficiency practices.
Notes
Palmer, J. and I. Cooper 2013. ‘United Kingdom housing energy fact file 2013’. In Department of Energy and Climate Change. London: HMSO. DoH (Department of Health) 2011. Cold Weather Plan for England: Protecting Health and Reducing Harm from Severe Cold Weather. London: HMSO. Hills, J. 2011. Fuel Poverty: The Problem and its Measurement. CASE Report 69. London sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cr/CASEreport69.pdf. Marmot Review Team 2011. Health Impacts of Cold Homes and Fuel Poverty. London: Friends of the Earth. Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) 2007. UK Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2007. London: HMSO. Hirst, E. and M. Brown 1990. ‘Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy’. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 3: 267–81. Jaffe, A. B. and R. N. Stavins 1994. ‘The energy-efficiency gap: what does it mean?’ Energy Policy 22: 804–10. Neij, L., L. Mundaca and E. Moukhametshina 2009. ‘Choice-decision determinants for the (non) adoption of energy efficiency technologies in households’. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. Spaargaren, G. 2011. ‘Theories of practices: agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order’. Global Environmental Change 21: 813–22. Hargreaves, T. 2011. ‘Practice-ing behaviour change: applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change’. Journal of Consumer Culture 11: 79–99. Shove, E. 2010. ‘Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change’. Environment and Planning A 42(6): 1273–85. Shove, E. and G. Walker 2014. ‘What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand’. Theory, Culture & Society 31: 41–58. Royston, S. 2014. ‘Dragon-breath and snow-melt: know-how, experience and heat flows in the home’. Energy Research and Social Science 2: 148–58. Wilhite, H. 2013. ‘Energy consumption as cultural practice: implications for the theory and policy of sustainable energy use’. In Cultures of Energy: Power, Practices, Technologies, eds S. Strauss, S. Rupp and T. Love, 60–72. Walnut Creed, CA: Left Coast Press. Bartiaux, F., K. Gram-Hanssen, P. Fonseca, L. Ozoliņa and T. H. Christensen 2014. ‘A practice–theory approach to homeowners’ energy retrofits in four European areas’. Building Research and Information 42(4): 1–14. Warde, A. 2005. ‘Consumption and theories of practice’. Journal of Consumer Culture 5: 131–53. Murphy, S. and M. Patterson 2011. ‘Motorcycling edgework: a practice theory perspective’. Journal of Marketing Management 27: 1322–40. Blue, S., E. Shove, C. Carmona and M. Kelly 2014. ‘Theories of practice and public health: understanding (un)healthy practices’. Critical Public Health. DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2014.980396. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press. Foucault, M. 1990. The History of Sexuality: The Use of Pleasure. New York: Vintage. Schatzki, T. R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reckwitz, A. 2002. ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’. European Journal of Social Theory 5: 243–63. Shove, E., M. Pantzar and M. Watson 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London: Sage. Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. Røpke, I. 2009. ‘Theories of practice: new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption’. Ecological Economics 68: 2490–97. Wilhite, H. 2008. ‘New thinking on the agentive relationship between end-use technologies and energy-using practices’. Energy Efficiency 1: 121–30. Maréchal, K. 2009. ‘An evolutionary perspective on the economics of energy consumption: the crucial role of habits’. Journal of Economic Issues 43: 69–88. Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. Sayer, A. 2013. ‘Power, sustainability and wellbeing’. In Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change, eds E. Shove and N. Spurling, 330–57. London: Routledge. Archer, M. S. and J. Q. Tritter 2000. Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonization. London: Routledge. Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hollis, M. 1987. The Cunning of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S. 2009. ‘Introduction: the reflexive re-turn’. In Conversations about Reflexivity, ed. M. S. Archer, 1–14. London: Routledge. Archer, M. S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bourdieu, P. and L. J. Wacquant 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Mead, G. H. 1938. The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Archer, M. S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S. 2007. Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fleetwood, S. 2008. ‘Structure, institution, agency, habit, and reflexive deliberation’. Journal of Institutional Economics 4: 183–203. Sayer, A. 2013. ‘Power, sustainability and wellbeing’. In Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change, eds E. Shove and N. Spurling, 330–57. London: Routledge. Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Adams, M. 2006. ‘Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: towards an understanding of contemporary identity’. Sociology 40: 511–528. Sweetman, P. 2003. ‘Twenty-first century dis-ease? Habitual reflexivity or the reflexive habitus’. Sociological Review 51: 528–49. Elder-Vass, D. 2007. ‘Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action’. Sociological Theory 25: 325–46. Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Darby, S. 2006. ‘Social learning and public policy: lessons from an energy-conscious village’. Energy Policy 34: 2929–40. Braun, V. and V. Clarke 2006. ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. Silverman, D. 2011. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage. Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage. Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. ‘Five misunderstandings about case-study research’. Qualitative Inquiry 12: 219–45. Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. Archer, M. S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shove, E., M. Pantzar and M. Watson 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London: Sage. Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. Archer, M. S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hitchings, R., R. Collins and R. Day 2015. ‘Inadvertent environmentalism and the action–value opportunity: reflections from studies at both ends of the generational spectrum’. Local Environment 20(3): 369–85. Frankfurt, H. G. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bhaskar, R. [1979] 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge. Archer, M. S. 2007. Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sayer, A. 2011. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Coltrane, S., D. Archer and E. Aronson 1986. ‘The social-psychological foundations of successful energy conservation programmes’. Energy Policy 14: 133–48. Ball, R., R. Cullen and C. Gan 1999. ‘The diffusion of energy efficiency innovations among residential energy consumers’. New Zealand Economic Papers 33: 115–35. Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dearing, J. W. 2008. ‘Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory’. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 14: 99–108. McMichael, M. and Shipworth, D. 2013. ‘The value of social networks in the diffusion of energy-efficiency innovations in UK households’. Energy Policy 53: 159–68. Lawson, T. 2006. Economics and Reality. London: Routledge. Cabinet Office 2011. Behaviour Change and Energy Use. London: HMSO. Archer, M. S. 2007. Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Winther, T. and T. Ericson 2013. ‘Matching policy and people? Household responses to the promotion of renewable electricity’. Energy Efficiency 6: 369–85. Røpke, I. 2009. ‘Theories of practice: new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption’. Ecological Economics 68: 2490–97. Mouzelis, N. 2009. Modern and Postmodern Social Theorising: Bridging the Divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Evans, E. 2014. ‘How green is my valley? The art of getting people in Wales to care about climate change’. Journal of Critical Realism 13: 304–25. Additional information
Notes on contributors
Oliver Bonnington
Oliver Bonnington is Research Fellow in Sociology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK. Oliver's research interests are in the sociology of health and illness, social theory, stigma and modes of qualitative inquiry.
![Sample our Social Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110822/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Social-Sciences.jpg"})