The Indispensability of Reflexivity to Practice: The Case of Home Energy Efficiency

References

• Adams, M. 2006. ‘Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: towards an understanding of contemporary identity’. Sociology 40: 511–528.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2007. Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2009. ‘Introduction: the reflexive re-turn’. In Conversations about Reflexivity, ed. M. S. Archer, 1–14. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. and J. Q. Tritter 2000. Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R., R. Cullen and C. Gan 1999. ‘The diffusion of energy efficiency innovations among residential energy consumers’. New Zealand Economic Papers 33: 115–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bartiaux, F., K. Gram-Hanssen, P. Fonseca, L. Ozoliņa and T. H. Christensen 2014. ‘A practice–theory approach to homeowners’ energy retrofits in four European areas’. Building Research and Information 42(4): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. [1979] 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blue, S., E. Shove, C. Carmona and M. Kelly 2014. ‘Theories of practice and public health: understanding (un)healthy practices’. Critical Public Health. DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2014.980396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. and L. J. Wacquant 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and V. Clarke 2006. ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office 2011. Behaviour Change and Energy Use. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Coltrane, S., D. Archer and E. Aronson 1986. ‘The social-psychological foundations of successful energy conservation programmes’. Energy Policy 14: 133–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby, S. 2006. ‘Social learning and public policy: lessons from an energy-conscious village’. Energy Policy 34: 2929–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearing, J. W. 2008. ‘Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory’. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 14: 99–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) 2007. UK Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2007. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• DoH (Department of Health) 2011. Cold Weather Plan for England: Protecting Health and Reducing Harm from Severe Cold Weather. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. 2007. ‘Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action’. Sociological Theory 25: 325–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, E. 2014. ‘How green is my valley? The art of getting people in Wales to care about climate change’. Journal of Critical Realism 13: 304–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, S. 2008. ‘Structure, institution, agency, habit, and reflexive deliberation’. Journal of Institutional Economics 4: 183–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. ‘Five misunderstandings about case-study research’. Qualitative Inquiry 12: 219–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1990. The History of Sexuality: The Use of Pleasure. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T. 2011. ‘Practice-ing behaviour change: applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change’. Journal of Consumer Culture 11: 79–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, J. 2011. Fuel Poverty: The Problem and its Measurement. CASE Report 69. London sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cr/CASEreport69.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, E. and M. Brown 1990. ‘Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy’. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 3: 267–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchings, R., R. Collins and R. Day 2015. ‘Inadvertent environmentalism and the action–value opportunity: reflections from studies at both ends of the generational spectrum’. Local Environment 20(3): 369–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, M. 1987. The Cunning of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. and R. N. Stavins 1994. ‘The energy-efficiency gap: what does it mean?’ Energy Policy 22: 804–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2006. Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maréchal, K. 2009. ‘An evolutionary perspective on the economics of energy consumption: the crucial role of habits’. Journal of Economic Issues 43: 69–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmot Review Team 2011. Health Impacts of Cold Homes and Fuel Poverty. London: Friends of the Earth.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, M. and Shipworth, D. 2013. ‘The value of social networks in the diffusion of energy-efficiency innovations in UK households’. Energy Policy 53: 159–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. 1938. The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouzelis, N. 2009. Modern and Postmodern Social Theorising: Bridging the Divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. and M. Patterson 2011. ‘Motorcycling edgework: a practice theory perspective’. Journal of Marketing Management 27: 1322–40.
   Google Scholar
• Neij, L., L. Mundaca and E. Moukhametshina 2009. ‘Choice-decision determinants for the (non) adoption of energy efficiency technologies in households’. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. and I. Cooper 2013. ‘United Kingdom housing energy fact file 2013’. In Department of Energy and Climate Change. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002. ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’. European Journal of Social Theory 5: 243–63.
   Google Scholar
• Røpke, I. 2009. ‘Theories of practice: new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption’. Ecological Economics 68: 2490–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royston, S. 2014. ‘Dragon-breath and snow-melt: know-how, experience and heat flows in the home’. Energy Research and Social Science 2: 148–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2011. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2013. ‘Power, sustainability and wellbeing’. In Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change, eds E. Shove and N. Spurling, 330–57. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2010. ‘Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change’. Environment and Planning A 42(6): 1273–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar and M. Watson 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. and G. Walker 2014. ‘What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand’. Theory, Culture & Society 31: 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2011. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G. 2011. ‘Theories of practices: agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order’. Global Environmental Change 21: 813–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetman, P. 2003. ‘Twenty-first century dis-ease? Habitual reflexivity or the reflexive habitus’. Sociological Review 51: 528–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warde, A. 2005. ‘Consumption and theories of practice’. Journal of Consumer Culture 5: 131–53.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhite, H. 2008. ‘New thinking on the agentive relationship between end-use technologies and energy-using practices’. Energy Efficiency 1: 121–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhite, H. 2013. ‘Energy consumption as cultural practice: implications for the theory and policy of sustainable energy use’. In Cultures of Energy: Power, Practices, Technologies, eds S. Strauss, S. Rupp and T. Love, 60–72. Walnut Creed, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winther, T. and T. Ericson 2013. ‘Matching policy and people? Household responses to the promotion of renewable electricity’. Energy Efficiency 6: 369–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar