Abstract
Web-based information is a valuable resource for people affected by stroke, however its accuracy and quality have been questioned. In this study, 30 stroke education websites were reviewed using accountability, readability, and reliability measures. Fifteen consumers and 11 health professionals evaluated six sites in terms of their design, content, and ease of use. The websites mostly met accountability criteria, but their reliability scores were low and their readability was high. Consumers’ opinions were consistently higher than health professionals’, but scores indicated their preferences for particular websites, especially in terms of design. The importance of considering consumers’ preferences when designing and recommending websites is highlighted.