64
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Grand Rounds

Stroke Education Materials on the World Wide Web: An Evaluation of Their Quality and Suitability

, &
Pages 29-40 | Published online: 02 Feb 2015

REFERENCES

  • Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ . 1997;314:1875–1884.
  • Wellwood I, Dennis MS, Warlow CR Perceptions and knowledge of stroke among surviving patients with stroke and their carers. Age Ageing. 1994;23:293–298.
  • Benigeri M, Pluye R Shortcomings of health infor-mation on the Internet. Health Promot Int. 2003;18:381–386.
  • Computer-based consumer health information. The Consumer Health Information Source Bulletin. 2000;6:70–81.
  • Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Maxfield A. Published criteria for evaluating web sites: review. BMJ. 1999;318:647–649.
  • Forster A, Smith J, Young J, Knapp P, House A, Wright J. Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. 2001(1).
  • Kuster JM. Internet resources for stroke and apha-sia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2000;7(2):21–31.
  • O'Mahony PG, Rodgers H, Thomson RG, Dobson R, James OFW. Satisfaction with information and advice received by stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:68–72.
  • Lewis D. The Internet as a resource for healthcare information. JAMA. 1998;283(13):1677.
  • Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA. 1997;277:1244–1246.
  • Cline RJW, Haynes KM. Consumer health informa-tion on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:671–692.
  • Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross-sec-tional survey. BMJ. 2000;321:1511–1515.
  • Seidman JJ, Steinwachs D, Rubin HR. Design and testing of a tool for evaluating the quality of dia-betes consumer-information websites. I Med Internet Res. 2003;5:e30.
  • Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: Is the information good enough? BMJ. 1999;318: 318–322.
  • Wyatt JC. Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web. BMJ. 1997;314:1879–1883.
  • Graber MA, Roller CM, Kaeble B. Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web. I Tam Pract. 1999;48(1):58–63.
  • Davis TC, Mayeaux EJ, Fredrickson D, Bocchini JA, Jackson RH, Murphy PW. Reading ability of parents compared with reading levels of pediatric patient education materials. Pediatrics. 1994;93(3):460–468.
  • Estrada CA, Hryniewicz MM, Barnes Higgs V, Collins C, Byrd JC. Anticoagulant patient informa-tion material is written at high readability levels. Stroke. 2000;31:2966–2970.
  • Clement WA, Wilson S, Bingham BJ. A guide to cre-ating your own patient-oriented website. I R Soc Med. 2002;95:64–67.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. Aspects of Literacy: Assessed Skill Levels. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 1996.
  • Sullivan-Fowler M. Consumer health web sites. Consumer Health Information Source Bull. 2000;6: 94–113.
  • The Intercollegiate Working Party for Stroke. National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. Royal CollegeofPhysicians. Available at: http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/books/stroke/. Accessed August 14, 2001.
  • Murphy PW, Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Decker BC. Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM): a quick reading test for patients. I Reading. 1993;37(2):124–130.
  • Baird TA. Surfing for stroke: websites on stroke for patients and professionals. I Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(4):i2.
  • Eysenbach G. Consumer health informatics. BMJ. 2000;320:1713–1716.
  • Doupi P, Van Der Lei J. Rx medication information for the public and the WWW: quality issues. Med Inform. 1999;24:171–179.
  • Hanger HC, Mulley GR Questions people ask about stroke. Stroke. 1993;24:536–538.
  • van Veenedaal H, Grinspun DR, Adriaanse HR Educational needs of stroke survivors and their family members, as perceived by themselves and by health professionals. Patient Educ Counseling. 1996;28:265–276.
  • Coulter A. Evidence based patient information is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it. BMJ. 1998;317(7153):225–227.
  • Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe PM, Latthe M, Khan KS. Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. BMJ. 2002;324:581–582.
  • Eysenbach G, Jadad AR. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age. I Med Internet Res. 2001;3:e19.
  • O'Mahony PG, Rodgers H, Thomson RG, Dobson R, James OFW. Satisfaction with information and advice received by stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:68–72.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.