560
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Presentation and management of docetaxel-related adverse effects in patients with breast cancer

&
Pages 253-259 | Published online: 27 May 2014

Abstract

The taxane chemotherapeutic agent docetaxel has been utilized in the management of breast cancer in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant and metastatic setting. Although well tolerated by the majority of patients, docetaxel toxicity may limit the dose which can be administered. Adverse events include infusion reactions, febrile neutropenia, fatigue, fluid retention, pneumonitis, cutaneous and nail toxicity, epiphora and lacrimal duct stenosis, gastrointestinal complications, and neuropathies. In this review, we explore these complications and how they can be effectively managed to improve patient quality of life during and following docetaxel therapy.

Introduction

Docetaxel (Taxotere®; Sanofi-Aventis Inc., Laval, QC, Canada) is an important antimicrotubule agent used to treat a variety of solid tumors including breast cancer, where docetaxel-containing regimens improve outcomes for patients in the metastatic, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. This paper will provide an overview of the current roles of docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic and early-stage breast cancer as well as management of common side effects in cancer patients.

Efficacy of docetaxel and benefit to risk assessment in breast cancer

The use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy has contributed greatly to the reduction in cause-specific mortality due to breast cancer in the Western Hemisphere.Citation1 The decision to use adjuvant chemotherapeutic agents (ie, the administration of cytotoxic treatment following primary surgery) is largely driven by the anticipated risk of breast cancer distant recurrence, as determined by histology of invasive disease, expression of estrogen and/or progesterone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 status, tumor size, nodal status, and age of the patient.Citation2,Citation3 In general, adjuvant chemotherapy is considered for patients with hormone-negative breast cancer with tumor size >0.5 cm or with pathological node involvement. For those patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, chemotherapeutic agents are usually administered in the setting of pathologically positive lymph nodes, large tumor size, high tumor grade, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion and/or high recurrence score on gene expression recurrence assays.Citation4

The taxanes, docetaxel and paclitaxel, are among the most effective single agents in early breast cancer. Clinically meaningful benefits of taxane incorporation in the adjuvant setting were affirmed in the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group 2012 meta-analysis for women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. The addition of taxane to anthracycline resulted in a further reduction in the event rate ratio of recurrence of 0.87, breast cancer mortality of 0.99, and overall mortality of 0.89 when compared with anthracycline alone.Citation5 The benefits of taxane incorporation were independent of age, nodal status, tumor size, tumor grade, and hormone receptor status across clinical trials. As a result, anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapeutic regimens have become the standard of care in early stage breast cancers. Among the most active adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, the docetaxel-based combinations of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC),Citation6Citation8 docetaxel with cyclophosphamide,Citation9,Citation10 sequential anthracycline (eg, FEC [5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide]) followed by docetaxel monotherapy,Citation11Citation14 and docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumabCitation15 are most commonly used.

Similarly, combinations and sequences of anthracycline and taxanes have become the standard of care for preoperative neoadjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. The value of docetaxel in the preoperative setting was first demonstrated with the Aberdeen study, in which tumor responses and overall survival were improved with sequential anthracycline–docetaxel when compared with continuing anthracycline chemotherapy.Citation16,Citation17

Taxanes also play an important role in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The aims of systemic treatment are to palliate symptoms, prolong survival, and maintain quality of life. Even though no prospective randomized controlled clinical trials have shown that systemic chemotherapy improves overall survival versus best supportive care, docetaxel-based trials have demonstrated improved survival outcomes in the setting of metastatic disease when compared with other chemotherapy regimens.Citation18Citation20 The outcomes for patients with metastatic breast cancer have improved significantly over the last two decades, and this is largely attributed to the availability of novel systemic therapies. A large retrospective study published by the British Columbia Agency Breast Tumor Group revealed that patients who were diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer between 1997 and 2001 had a 45% overall survival rate at 2 years in comparison with those who were diagnosed between 1991 and 1995 with only a 34% survival rate at 2 years.Citation21 Chemotherapy is often the treatment choice for patients with visceral metastases associated with end-organ dysfunction, short disease-free interval, and those with rapidly progressive symptomatic disease given the higher likelihood of achieving a response rate.Citation22

Docetaxel has comparable activity to anthracycline in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.Citation23 Taxanes are often the treatment of choice either as single agents or in combination in patients who are at risk for cardiac complications due to prior anthracycline exposure and those who developed metastases less than 12 months after prior anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy. Even though combinations of anthracycline and taxane generate high response rates, they are associated with a higher toxicity rate, with no clear survival advantage over sequential monotherapy.Citation19,Citation24 Consequently, combination regimens are generally reserved for patients with rapidly progressive and/or symptomatic visceral disease. Sequential single-agent chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for most patients with metastatic breast cancer due to a reasonable chance of response, successful symptom palliation, and improved quality of life while minimizing toxicities. For the subgroup of patients with hormone-positive disease, endocrine therapy is often used as the initial treatment of choice for those with soft tissue and bone metastases, while chemotherapy is reserved for those with visceral metastases.Citation22

For those patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer, docetaxel has been shown to be synergistic with trastuzumab (the HER-2-directed monoclonal antibody) in preclinical models.Citation25 Docetaxel is commonly combined with trastuzumab, where it has demonstrated important survival advantages in combinationCitation26,Citation27 and, most recently, with the triplet therapy of docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (a monoclonal antibody that prevents HER family dimerization).Citation28

Dosing schedules

Docetaxel has been used in breast cancer therapy in two dosing schedules which differ in toxicity profiles. The original registration regimen, and the most frequent in clinical practice, is intravenous administration at 3-weekly intervals, with a starting dose of between 60 and 100 mg/m2. Weekly intravenous docetaxel schedules are most commonly given day 1, day 8, and day 15 every 28-day cycle, with dosing of 25–35 mg/m2. The use of weekly docetaxel schedules is largely restricted to palliation of metastatic disease, where it has been shown to have fewer neutropenic complications than 21-day docetaxel but has somewhat lower anticancer activity and higher rates of skin toxicity and fatigue.Citation14,Citation29,Citation30

Presentation of side effects and management of docetaxel-related adverse events

Docetaxel causes a variety of acute and long-term side effects. Fortunately, most of the common treatment-related toxicities, such as infusion reactions, febrile neutropenia, fatigue, and fluid retention are resolved between cycles of treatment or reversible upon treatment discontinuation. Prior to therapy administration, patients are screened for adequate renal function, hepatic function, and bone marrow function to ensure these acute side-effects are resolved. However, peripheral neuropathy is a long-term side effect of taxane chemotherapy that may be debilitating for patients well after completion of treatment.

Acute side effects

Infusion reactions

Docetaxel is one of the cytotoxic agents that frequently triggers acute infusion reactions. These reactions typically occur within minutes or hours of drug administration, with characteristic symptoms including “standard” reactions of flushing, itching, dyspnea, fever, hypoxia, and fever, and “classical hypersensitivity” reactions (ie, angioedema, urticaria, wheezing, stridor, anaphylaxis, and cardiorespiratory arrest).Citation31 Hypersensitivity reactions tend to be most severe on rechallenge with the drug. Premedication with glucocorticoids and antihistamines prior to infusion can help to reduce and prevent the severity of reactions, and they are routinely administered to patients prior to docetaxel exposure. Even with premedication, approximately 2% of patients will experience potentially life-threatening reactions.Citation32,Citation33 While both the taxane and the solvent in which the drug is dissolved (polysorbate 80) can contribute to infusion reactions, the underlying mechanisms of docetaxel-induced infusion reactions still remain unclear.Citation34Citation38 Symptoms associated with standard infusion reactions and hypersensitivity/allergic reactions have been attributed mainly to cytokine release and mast cell/basophil activation, respectively. Initial management of standard infusion reactions includes temporary cessation of drug infusion for 30 minutes, with administration of additional intravenous antihistamines and glucocorticoids. Upon resolution of symptoms, infusion may be restarted at a slower rate. For anaphylaxis, stabilization of the cardiorespiratory system and use of epinephrine are indication, and discontinuation of drug infusion is usually required.

Febrile neutropenia

Myelosuppression is one of the most common treatment-related toxicities following administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients receiving combination chemotherapy experience a small to moderate reduction in their white cell count most commonly 10–14 days after initial administration. Febrile neutropenia is defined as an oral temperature >38.5°C or two consecutive readings of >38.0°C for 2 hours with an absolute neutrophil count <0.5 × 109/L.Citation39 The condition is associated with significant morbidity and mortality if not managed appropriately. Patients who develop febrile neutropenia are at increased risk of serious infections and often require hospitalization.

In contrast to many chemotherapeutic regimens used in breast cancer therapy, there is a high risk of developing febrile neutropenia with the various docetaxel-containing chemotherapeutic regimens. The cumulative risk of febrile neutropenia ranges from 5%–25% with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel to 21%–24% with adjuvant TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy when these regimens are given without primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). The consensus guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommend the use of G-CSFs as primary prophylaxis if the risk of toxicity is estimated to be 20% or more, with the hope of reducing the incidence of neutropenic fever, duration of neutropenia, infectious complications, and rate of hospitalization.Citation40Citation43 Furthermore, secondary prophylaxis is warranted in patients who have developed febrile neutropenia with previous cycles of chemotherapy, particularly in the curative intent setting of (neo)adjuvant therapy where dose reduction may compromise outcome. In the metastatic setting, dose reduction is often instituted after development of febrile neutropenia to minimize future complications.

Treatment of febrile neutropenia typically involves risk assessment, blood cultures, admission into hospital and administration of broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, and close clinical monitoring. Even though the use of G-CSFs has been shown to shorten the duration of neutropenia, fever, and length of hospital stay, no survival benefit has been demonstrated. As a result, ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology), ASCO, and NCCN guidelines recommend against routine use of G-CSFs for patients with established febrile neutropenia.Citation40,Citation41,Citation44 However, use of G-CSFs can be considered for patients with high-risk features such as hospital duration >10 days, profound neutropenia (with <100 cells/μL), age >65, multiorgan dysfunction, and hypotension.

Fluid retention

Docetaxel therapy frequently triggers fluid retention presenting as swelling of the extremities, pleural effusions, ascites, and pericardial effusion. One of the proposed mechanisms underlying this adverse effect is increased permeability of the capillaries resulting in leakage of fluid into the surrounding tissue.Citation45 The severity of this reaction is proportional to the cumulative dose of the drug administered. Premedication with glucocorticoid starting 24 hours prior and 48 hours following each docetaxel dose decreases the rate of fluid retention from 20% to 6% and increases the tolerability of this drug among patients.Citation46 Studies have indicated that a single dose of dexamethasone, rather than the standard 3 doses, may be sufficient to prevent docetaxel-fluid retention.Citation47,Citation48 Patients should be advised to monitor for signs of increased fluid accumulation in their fingers, ankles, and mid-abdominal areas. Treatment with diuretics may provide symptomatic relief and limit the severity of fluid retention.Citation49

Cutaneous toxicity

Docetaxel is also known to cause a skin toxicity known as acral erythema. It often starts with a tingling sensation in the palms and soles, followed by tenderness and edema. Occasional desquamation and blistering in the affected area may also occur. The pathogenesis of acral erythema remains unclear. Proposed mechanisms include immunoglobulin E-mediated type 1 reaction and direct toxic effect of chemotherapy on the eccrine sweat glands.Citation50 Treatment of acral erythema mainly includes cessation of drug and symptomatic treatment to relieve the painful swelling and erythema. In addition, intravenous docetaxel has also been associated with a specific variant of acral erythema known as erythrodysesthesia plaque that presents as a fixed, solitary plaque proximal to the infusion site without involvement of the palms and soles. The characteristic lesion typically resolves with desquamation followed by hyperpigmentation weeks after the initial insult.Citation51,Citation52

Nail toxicity

Docetaxel can cause a wide range of nail toxicities including subungual and splinter hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis, paronychia, separation of the nail from the nail bed, and cessation of nail growth. The severity of the nail changes correlates with the total number of chemotherapy cycles and the cumulative dose of chemotherapy administered. Studies have indicated that the use of frozen gloves and socks can slow the onset and lower the severity of symptoms in a large proportion of patients by reducing blood flow to the affected areas.Citation53,Citation54 The majority of the symptoms resolve spontaneously within 6–12 months after chemotherapy discontinuation.

Pneumonitis

Docetaxel has been rarely reported to cause acute, bilateral interstitial lung disease that can occur during, within a few hours, or up to weeks after initial administration. Symptoms include exertional dyspnea, dry cough, malaise, and fever.Citation55 The mechanism behind interstitial pneumonitis is not well understood at the present time. Some researchers believe that it is predominantly a lymphocyte-mediated immune reaction.Citation33 In contrast to paclitaxel, the incidence of pulmonary toxicity is proportional to the total dose of docetaxel administered. In a Phase III trial of women with advanced breast cancer, a statistically significant higher rate of pulmonary toxicity was observed with higher docetaxel doses (100 mg/m2 in comparison with 60 mg/m2).Citation56 Moreover, a higher incidence of pneumonitis was seen in patients receiving weekly versus every 3 weeks docetaxel regimen.Citation57 The rate of pulmonary toxicity is also higher when docetaxel is given in combination with gemcitabine or radiation.Citation58Citation60 Patients with preexisting lung disease are at a higher risk of developing pulmonary complications with docetaxel treatment. Therefore, taxane treatment is relatively contraindicated in patients with preexisting lung disease.Citation61 Fortunately, most cases resolve with supportive care and discontinuation of taxane therapy. For patients with clinical signs of oxygen desaturation or impending respiratory failure, an empiric trial of glucocorticoids may be warranted.

Fatigue

Most patients receiving docetaxel chemotherapy will experience fatigue during the course of their treatment. Research indicates that continuous exercise may help to delay the onset of fatigue and optimize physical function.Citation62,Citation63 To date, no studies have been conducted on the management of docetaxel-related fatigue. Other common causes of asthenia such as depression, pain, anemia, and hypothyroidism must also be considered and treated accordingly.

Epiphora and lacrimal duct stenosis

Epiphora (excessive tearing) is a frequent complaint of breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel. Although most patients treated with short courses of adjuvant docetaxel find this is a self-limited problem that resolves soon after completion of docetaxel chemotherapy, it is particularly frequent and severe in those receiving prolonged docetaxel therapy in the metastatic setting and those treated with weekly docetaxel. In some cases, canalicular fibrosis requiring surgical stenting has been identified.Citation64Citation66

Gastrointestinal complications

Cases of gastrointestinal perforation, and dehydration as a consequence of enterocolitis, colitis, and neutropenic enterocolitis have been reported in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel. Patients receiving this agent should be carefully evaluated if severe diarrhea or new onset abdominal pain occurs, and surgical consultation is warranted in patients with severe enterocolitis or demonstrated perforation.Citation67,Citation68

Long term side effects

Neuropathies

Two of the most common long-term side effects of docetaxel chemotherapy are sensory and motor peripheral neuropathy. Fortunately, the incidence of both of these is much less than paclitaxel. Grade 3 and 4 neuropathy is only observed in less than 10% of patients receiving docetaxel therapy.Citation69,Citation70 Major clinical symptoms include numbness and tingling of the hands and feet, with loss of reflexes. The incidence of neuropathy is dependent upon the total dose of the drug administered. In the Phase III clinical trial of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel, neuropathy of grade 2 or greater began at a dosage of 371 mg/m2.Citation71 The mainstay of treatment includes prompt recognition of onset of symptoms with subsequent delay of therapy or dose reduction. Unfortunately, none of the pharmaceutical agents have demonstrated efficacy in the prevention and treatment of taxane-induced neuropathy. Anticonvulsants such as gabapentin may be useful in providing symptomatic relief.Citation72

Conclusion

Docetaxel is an effective chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of breast cancer in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic settings. Its widespread use has contributed to improvements in breast cancer-specific survival seen in many developed countries. Even though the drug can cause a wide range of toxicities, most of them are treatable with supportive care and cessation of the chemotherapeutic agent. The decision to initiate chemotherapy should always be made in partnership with the patient, who should be fully informed about the potential side effects of the treatment.

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • BerryDACroninKAPlevritisSKEffect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancerN Engl J Med2005353171784179216251534
  • HowladerNNooneAMKrapchoMThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008National Cancer InstituteBethesda, MD2010 Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008/index.htmlAccessed May 10, 2014
  • van der HageJAMieogJSvan de VeldeCJPutterHBartelinkHvan de VijverMJImpact of established prognostic factors and molecular subtype in very young breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of four EORTC randomized controlled trialsBreast Cancer Res2011133R6821699739
  • AlbainKSBarlowWEShakSPrognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trialLancet Oncol2010111556520005174
  • PetoRDaviesCGodwinJEarly Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG)Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trialsLancet2012379981443244422152853
  • MackeyJRMartinMPienkowskiTAdjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in node-positive breast cancer: 10-year follow-up of the Phase 3 randomised BCIRG 001 trialLancet Oncol2013141728023246022
  • MartinMPienkowskiTMackeyJAdjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancerN Engl J Med2005352222302231315930421
  • SwainSMLandSRRitterMWAmenorrhea in premenopausal women on the doxorubicin-and-cyclophosphamide-followed-by-docetaxel arm of NSABP B-30 trialBreast Cancer Res Treat2009113231532018302020
  • JonesSHolmesFAO’ShaughnessyJDocetaxel with cyclophosphamide is associated with an overall survival benefit compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: 7-year follow-up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735J Clin Oncol20092781177118319204201
  • JonesSESavinMAHolmesFAPhase III trial comparing doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide with docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancerJ Clin Oncol200624345381538717135639
  • CoudertBAsselainBCamponeMExtended benefit from sequential administration of docetaxel after standard fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide regimen for node-positive breast cancer: the 8-year follow-up results of the UNICANCER-PACS01 trialOncologist201217790090922610153
  • EiermannWPienkowskiTCrownJPhase III study of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with concomitant versus sequential docetaxel as adjuvant treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, node-positive breast cancer: BCIRG-005 trialJ Clin Oncol201129293877388421911726
  • RocheHFumoleauPSpielmannMSequential adjuvant epirubicin-based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS 01 TrialJ Clin Oncol200624365664567117116941
  • SparanoJAWangMMartinoSWeekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancerN Engl J Med2008358161663167118420499
  • SlamonDEiermannWRobertNAdjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancerN Engl J Med2011365141273128321991949
  • HeysSDHutcheonAWSarkarTKNeoadjuvant docetaxel in breast cancer: 3-year survival results from the Aberdeen trialClin Breast Cancer20023Suppl 2S69S7412435290
  • SmithICHeysSDHutcheonAWNeoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxelJ Clin Oncol20022061456146611896092
  • NabholtzJMFalksonCCamposDDocetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, Phase III trialJ Clin Oncol200321696897512637459
  • Piccart-GebhartMJBurzykowskiTBuyseMTaxanes alone or in combination with anthracyclines as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic breast cancerJ Clin Oncol200826121980198618421049
  • RavdinPMBurrisHA3rdCookGPhase II trial of docetaxel in advanced anthracycline-resistant or anthracenedione-resistant breast cancerJ Clin Oncol19951312287928858523050
  • ChiaSKSpeersCHD’YachkovaYThe impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancerCancer2007110597397917647245
  • WilckenNHornbuckleJGhersiDChemotherapy alone versus endocrine therapy alone for metastatic breast cancerCochrane Database Syst Rev20032CD00274712804433
  • ChanSFriedrichsKNoelDProspective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancerJ Clin Oncol19991782341235410561296
  • VermaSMaraninchiDO’ShaughnessyJCapecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapyCancer2005103122455246515892043
  • PegramMDKonecnyGEO’CallaghanCBerytMPietrasRSlamonDJRational combinations of trastuzumab with chemotherapeutic drugs used in the treatment of breast cancerJ Natl Cancer Inst2004961073974915150302
  • MartyMCognettiFMaraninchiDRandomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study groupJ Clin Oncol200523194265427415911866
  • ValeroVForbesJPegramMDMulticenter phase III randomized trial comparing docetaxel and trastuzumab with docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab as first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-gene-amplified metastatic breast cancer (BCIRG 007 study): two highly active therapeutic regimensJ Clin Oncol201129214915621115860
  • BaselgaJCortesJKimSBPertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancerN Engl J Med2012366210911922149875
  • SchroderCPde MunckLWestermannAMWeekly docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients: no superior benefits compared to three-weekly docetaxelEur J Cancer20114791355136221251813
  • StemmlerHJHarbeckNGroll de RiveraIProspective multicenter randomized Phase III study of weekly versus standard docetaxel (D2) for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancerOncology2010793–419720321358207
  • SyrigouEDannosIKotteasEHypersensitivity reactions to docetaxel: retrospective evaluation and development of a desensitization protocolInt Arch Allergy Immunol2011156332032421720178
  • SchrijversDWandersJDirixLCoping with toxicities of docetaxel (Taxotere)Ann Oncol81993476106118103352
  • WangGSYangKYPerngRPLife-threatening hypersensitivity pneumonitis induced by docetaxel (Taxotere)Br J Cancer20018591247125011720456
  • ArdavanisATryfonopoulosDYiotisIGerasimidisGBaziotisNRigatosGNon-allergic nature of docetaxel-induced acute hypersensitivity reactionsAnticancer Drugs200415658158515205600
  • EschalierALavarenneJBurtinCRenouxMChapuyERodriguezMStudy of histamine release induced by acute administration of antitumor agents in dogsCancer Chemother Pharmacol19882132462502452032
  • FossellaFVLeeJSMurphyWKPhase II study of docetaxel for recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancerJ Clin Oncol1994126123812447911160
  • SzebeniJMuggiaFMAlvingCRComplement activation by Cremophor EL as a possible contributor to hypersensitivity to paclitaxel: an in vitro studyJ Natl Cancer Inst19989043003069486816
  • WeissRBDonehowerRCWiernikPHHypersensitivity reactions from taxolJ Clin Oncol199087126312681972736
  • FreifeldAGBowEJSepkowitzKAClinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of AmericaClin Infect Dis201152442743121205990
  • National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkNCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines)Breast Cancer. Version 12014 Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#breast
  • AaproMSBohliusJCameronDA2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumoursEur J Cancer201147183221095116
  • AartsMJPetersFPMandigersCMPrimary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis during the first two cycles only or throughout all chemotherapy cycles in patients with breast cancer at risk for febrile neutropeniaJ Clin Oncol201331344290429623630211
  • MartinMLluchASeguiMAToxicity and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (TAC) or 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC): impact of adding primary prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to the TAC regimenAnn Oncol20061781205121216766587
  • SmithTJKhatcheressianJLymanGH2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guidelineJ Clin Oncol200624193187320516682719
  • SembKAAamdalSOianPCapillary protein leak syndrome appears to explain fluid retention in cancer patients who receive docetaxel treatmentJ Clin Oncol19981610342634329779722
  • PiccartMJKlijnJParidaensRCorticosteroids significantly delay the onset of docetaxel-induced fluid retention: final results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Investigational Drug Branch for Breast CancerJ Clin Oncol1997159314931559294478
  • ChouhanJDHerringtonJDSingle premedication dose of dexamethasone 20 mg IV before docetaxel administrationJ Oncol Pharm Pract201117315515920447949
  • MontoyaMEMarkowitzABKlementichFPalacioDDocetaxel and fluid retention: use of single-dose dexamethasoneJ Clin Oncol20072518S19635
  • SingerEASrinivasanRIntravenous therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer: toxicities and adverse eventsUrol Oncol201230Suppl 4S15S1922014836
  • EichDScharffetter-KochanekKEichHTTantcheva-PoorIKriegTAcral erythrodysesthesia syndrome caused by intravenous infusion of docetaxel in breast cancerAm J Clin Oncol200225659960212478008
  • ChewLChuenVSCutaneous reaction associated with weekly docetaxel administrationJ Oncol Pharm Pract2009151293418753180
  • ChuCYYangCHYangCYHsiaoGHChiuHCFixed erythrodysaesthesia plaque due to intravenous injection of docetaxelBr J Dermatol2000142480881110792238
  • CanGAydinerACavdarITaxane-induced nail changes: predictors and efficacy of the use of frozen gloves and socks in the prevention of nail toxicityEur J Oncol Nurs201216327027521784705
  • ScotteFTouraniJMBanuEMulticenter study of a frozen glove to prevent docetaxel-induced onycholysis and cutaneous toxicity of the handJ Clin Oncol200523194424442915994152
  • OchoaRBejaranoPAGluckSMonteroAJPneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis in a patient receiving adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide for stage 3 breast cancer: a case report and literature reviewJ Med Case Rep20126141323198815
  • HarveyVMouridsenHSemiglazovVPhase III trial comparing three doses of docetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced breast cancerJ Clin Oncol200624314963497017033039
  • ChenYMShihJFPerngRPTsaiCMWhang-PengJA randomized trial of different docetaxel schedules in non-small cell lung cancer patients who failed previous platinum-based chemotherapyChest200612941031103816608954
  • KatakamiNTakiguchiYYoshimoriKDocetaxel in combination with either cisplatin or gemcitabine in unresectable non-small cell lung carcinoma: a randomized Phase II study by the Japan Lung Cancer Cooperative Clinical Study GroupJ Thorac Oncol20061544745317409898
  • NakamuraMKoizumiTHayasakaMCisplatin and weekly docetaxel with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancerCancer Chemother Pharmacol20096361091109618818921
  • OnishiHKuriyamaKYamaguchiMConcurrent two-dimensional radiotherapy and weekly docetaxel in the treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a good local response but no good survival due to radiation pneumonitisLung Cancer2003401798412660011
  • TamiyaANaitoTMiuraSInterstitial lung disease associated with docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancerAnticancer Res20123231103110622399640
  • CourneyaKSSegalRJMackeyJREffects of aerobic and resistance exercise in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter randomized controlled trialJ Clin Oncol200725284396440417785708
  • MongaUGarberSLThornbyJExercise prevents fatigue and improves quality of life in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapyArch Phys Med Rehabil200788111416142217964881
  • ChanASuCde BoerRHGajdatsyAPrevalence of excessive tearing in women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapyJ Clin Oncol201331172123212723650421
  • EsmaeliBAminSValeroVProspective study of incidence and severity of epiphora and canalicular stenosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving docetaxelJ Clin Oncol200624223619362216877729
  • EsmaeliBValeroVEpiphora and canalicular stenosis associated with adjuvant docetaxel in early breast cancer: is excessive tearing clinically important?J Clin Oncol201331172076207723650413
  • BremerCTMonahanBPNecrotizing enterocolitis in neutropenia and chemotherapy: a clinical update and old lessons relearnedCurr Gastroenterol Rep20068433334116836946
  • DavilaMLNeutropenic enterocolitisCurr Opin Gastroenterol2006221444716319675
  • LeeJJSwainSMPeripheral neuropathy induced by microtubule-stabilizing agentsJ Clin Oncol200624101633164216575015
  • RiveraEMejiaJAArunBKPhase 3 study comparing the use of docetaxel on an every-3-week versus weekly schedule in the treatment of metastatic breast cancerCancer200811271455146118300256
  • JonesSEErbanJOvermoyerBRandomized Phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancerJ Clin Oncol200523245542555116110015
  • RaoRDMichalakJCSloanJAEfficacy of gabapentin in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (N00C3)Cancer200711092110211817853395