44
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Corrigendum

Morning and evening efficacy evaluation of rupatadine (10 and 20 mg), compared with cetirizine 10 mg in perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [Corrigendum]

Pages 135-137 | Published online: 17 Dec 2015
This article refers to:
Morning and evening efficacy evaluation of rupatadine (10 and 20 mg), compared with cetirizine 10 mg in perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Marmouz F, Giralt J, Izquierdo I. Journal of Asthma and Allergy. 2011;4:27–35.

On page 30, was incorrect. The corrected table is shown below.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline in ITT population

On page 31, and were incorrect. The corrected tables are shown below.

Table 2 Summary of morning (morning reflective) total symptoms score (5TSS) and nasal total symptoms score (4NTSS) assessments (ITT population)

Table 3 Summary of evening (evening reflective) total symptoms score (5TSS) assessments and nasal total symptoms score (4NTSS) (ITT population)

On page 33, was incorrect. The corrected figure is shown below.

Figure 3 Evolution of total symptoms score (5TSS): A) morning evaluation for the 5TSS scores during study period; B) evening evaluation for the 5TSS scores during the study period

Figure 3 Evolution of total symptoms score (5TSS): A) morning evaluation for the 5TSS scores during study period; B) evening evaluation for the 5TSS scores during the study period