468
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

KIBRA and Alzheimer‘s Disease: Is there Significance in the ‘noise‘ of Genome-Wide Association Data?

Pages 253-256 | Published online: 23 Apr 2009

Alzheimer‘s disease (AD) is one of the most significant disorders facing our population. According to the US NIH Institute on Aging Citation[101], there are up to 4.5 million individuals living with AD in the USA alone. Age is the greatest risk factor for AD. As we continue to live longer as a society, the devastating personal, social and economic effects of AD will dramatically increase unless effective treatments or prevention strategies can be developed to slow or halt its progression.

In addition to age, a person‘s genetic makeup is another clear contributor to the risk of developing AD. There are approximately 200 known mutations in three different genes (APP, PSEN1 and PSEN2) that result in many cases of AD with dementia onset before 60 years of age (sometimes termed early onset AD) and are primarily inherited in an autosomal-dominant form of transmission Citation[1–5]. Twin studies have suggested that up to 80% of AD cases with dementia onset after 60 years of age (late-onset AD) are attributable to heritable risk factors. One well studied example of such a risk factor is the e4 variant of the APOE gene, which was first associated with AD risk over 15 years ago Citation[6,7]. This risk factor remains one of the strongest genetic associations for a common complex human disorder. Advances in the ability to scan the human genome at millions of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, using a genome-wide association study (GWAS) design Citation[8,9], has greatly advanced the genetic study of AD as well as other disorders with purported common genetic roots. This approach at such depth is a relatively new tool in the search for additional common heritable risk factors. Several GWAS studies have been published for AD yielding multiple novel associations with surprisingly few overlapping loci Citation[10–15].

In a 2006 study led by Andreas Papassotiropoulos, my colleagues and I reported an association between a gene called KIBRA and human episodic memory performance in one of the first published studies using ultra-high density SNP genotyping arrays Citation[16]. In separate studies of two young adult groups and one late-middle-aged group, we found a significant association between absence of the T-allele at KIBRA rs17070145 SNP coupled with lower episodic memory task performance. Additionally, KIBRA transcripts were enriched in brain regions thought to play an important role in episodic memory, including the hippocampus. Finally, using functional MRI (fMRI), we found that the KIBRAT-allele noncarriers had an accentuated increase in hippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus activity during an episodic memory task, suggesting that these regions were ‘working harder‘ to perform the task in those individuals with the variant associated with risk for poor memory. The genetic association was subsequently independently confirmed in three separate studies Citation[17–19] and not supported in another study Citation[20].

In late 2007, a group utilizing patients from Northern Spain reported a putative genetic link between KIBRA and AD age-at-onset in a hypothesis-driven investigation of the exact same SNP our team had linked to memory performance Citation[21]. Their results suggested that the T-allele was associated with increased risk, something the authors suggested was inconsistent with what might be expected. Although their cohort was small, they were 71% powered to detect an association with an odds ratio greater than three. In 2008 we also reported an association between KIBRA and AD in 1026 cases and controls, many of whom were both clinically characterized and neuropathologically verified after death Citation[22]. In contrast to the Spanish findings, we found that T-allele noncarriers had elevated risk for AD, perhaps reflecting differences in geographical location, criteria utilized to classify cases and controls or other factors. In addition to our genetic data, we found significant transcriptional dysregulation of KIBRA and multiple biochemical interacting partners in laser-captured neurons from key brain regions in clinically characterized and neuropathologically verified cases and matched controls. Finally, we found that cognitively normal late-middle-aged KIBRAT-noncarriers had significantly reduced positron emission tomography (fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG]-PET) measurements of the cerebral metabolic rate for glucose in precuneus and posterior cingulate brain regions known to be preferentially affected by AD Citation[23,24]. Although we failed to detect an association between KIBRA and age at onset, Braak stage, Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD (CERAD) severity or the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score in the subset of subjects with this data available. Larger studies and more sensitive and uniform methods may be needed to investigate these relationships with adequate statistical power.

Could it be that the KIBRA effect is entirely due to a delicate alteration in cognitive reserve Citation[25–27]? Although not significant, we did observe a trend for later AD age at onset in carriers of the T-allele. Perhaps it is due to effects on the default pathway of brain activity Citation[28] through the metabolic changes in the precuneus and cingulate cortex? KIBRA has been shown to participate in the endocytic recycling pathway Citation[29] – could it be that KIBRA is altering the cellular re-uptake of β-amyloid and impacting plaque formation Citation[30]? The jury is still out on these questions but I feel that after addressing these remaining issues a clear link between KIBRA and AD will be established.

The combined odds ratio for KIBRA in our study was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.09–1.41; p = 0.0012). Such subtle associations are sometimes not significant enough to be prioritized for follow-up after GWAS. Instead one tends to focus on SNPs that approach or exceed genome-wide significance. Of course this is out of necessity as these investigations now assess upwards of 1 million SNPs simultaneously and follow-up of all the significant associations is typically cost prohibitive, even though one understands that false-negatives abound in this data owing to multiple hypothesis testing. This begs the question, how many significant loci are we ignoring simply owing to their marginal association statistics? The fact is that KIBRA would not have been investigated as an AD susceptibility gene had it not been first identified in the episodic memory study – it just simply is not significant enough from a genome-wide standpoint. However, in a hypothesis-driven investigation, the genetics meet statistical muster and the associated biological evidence is very convincing. Can these subtle yet valid associations yield important biological, diagnostic, or drug development clues for disease? If the answer to this last question is yes, the identification of such associations becomes a clear opportunity and challenge for AD and human genetics in general.

One way to empower the investigation of such subtle associations is to publicly and openly share all GWAS data. A quick look into a new data set can help make the case for further follow-up. The sharing of GWAS data and DNA samples has started in the AD field and a continuation of this effort is needed. Such efforts are exemplified by the National Institute on Aging sponsored AD Genetics Consortium and the National Cell Repository for Alzheimer‘s Disease (NCRAD) biospecimen bank Citation[102], as well as several other emerging initiatives. Another take home message from the KIBRA work is that there is clearly still room for hypothesis-driven candidate gene investigations in AD. However, one has to be cautious not to stop at the genetic association level alone, but to go the next step and demonstrate the importance of a specific gene in the context of disease. Demonstration of biological and/ordisease significance will be required not only for the subtle associations, but also for the strongest. Lastly, single SNP association analysis of GWAS data should be deprioritized for more intensive methods of multi-SNP ‘set association‘ or other compound genetic analyses that evaluate the relationships among multiple major and minor susceptibility genes Citation[31,32]. Most researchers consider late-onset AD to be a common and complex disease – one that is governed by multiple environmental and genetic risks. Although it is computationally intensive and the methods for analysis are still in their infancy, it will likely be an important direction for the field to move, namely, in treating AD as a disorder that will require an aggregate genetic score for the most accurate presymptomatic assessment of risk.

Even as we grapple with this question of how to handle the significant and important associations lost in the ‘noise‘ of GWAS data, the field of human genomics is undergoing yet another rapid and exciting change ushering in the era of affordable whole-genome resequencing with new attempts to simultaneously assess the association of billions of data points with disease. These ‘next generation‘ sequencing technologies promise to revolutionarize the field of human genetics as they put us very close to the goal of sequencing an entire person‘s three billion base pair genome for US$1000 Citation[33–35]. One has to wonder if we are truly ready to handle the statistical analysis of such large data sets in such a fashion where we won‘t throw out the proverbial baby with the bath water.

Acknowledgements

The field of Alzheimer‘s disease genetics would not be possible without the selfless patients, their families and caregivers who donate their time and biological specimens in the hope of eradicating Alzheimer‘s disease.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

Matthew J Huentelman is indebted to funding from the NIH-NINDS R01-NS059873, NIH-NIA P30-AG19610 and the State of Arizona. The author has no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

Matthew J Huentelman is indebted to funding from the NIH-NINDS R01-NS059873, NIH-NIA P30-AG19610 and the State of Arizona. The author has no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Bibliography

  • Clark RF , HuttonM, FuldnerMet al.: The structure of the presenilin 1 (S182) gene and identification of six novel mutations in early onset AD families. Alzheimer‘s Disease Collaborative Group.Nat. Genet.11, 219–222 (1995).
  • Goate A , Chartier-HarlinMC, MullanMet al.: Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer‘s disease.Nature349, 704–706 (1991).
  • Levy-Lahad E , WascoW, PoorkajPet al.: Candidate gene for the chromosome 1 familial Alzheimer‘s disease locus.Science269, 973–977 (1995).
  • Rogaev EI , SherringtonR, RogaevaEAet al.: Familial Alzheimer‘s disease inkindreds with missense mutations in a gene on chromosome 1 related to the Alzheimer‘s disease type 3 gene.Nature376, 775–778 (1995).
  • Sherrington R , RogaevEI, LiangYet al.: Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer‘s disease.Nature375, 754–760 (1995).
  • Corder EH , SaundersAM, StrittmatterWJet al.: Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer‘s disease in late onset families.Science261, 921–923 (1993).
  • Saunders AM , StrittmatterWJ, SchmechelDet al.: Association of apolipoprotein E allele e4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer‘s disease.Neurology43, 1467–1472 (1993).
  • Altshuler D , DalyMJ, LanderES: Genetic mapping in human disease.Science322, 881–888 (2008).
  • Hirschhorn JN , DalyMJ: Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits.Nat. Rev. Genet.6, 95–108 (2005).
  • Beecham GW , MartinER, LiYet al.: Genome-wide association study implicates a chromosome 12 risk locus for late-onset Alzheimer disease.Am. J. Hum. Genet.84, 35–43 (2009).
  • Bertram L , LangeC, MullinKet al.: Genome-wide association analysis reveals putative Alzheimer‘s disease susceptibility loci in addition to APOE.Am. J. Hum. Genet.83, 623–632 (2008).
  • Carrasquillo MM , ZouF, Pankratz VSet al.: Genetic variation in PCDH11X is associated with susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer‘s disease. Nat. Genet.41, 192–198 (2009).
  • Grupe A , AbrahamR, LiYet al.: Evidence for novel susceptibility genes for late-onset Alzheimer‘s disease from a genome-wide association study of putative functional variants.Hum. Mol. Genet.16, 865–873 (2007).
  • Meng Y , LeeJH, ChengRet al.: Association between SORL1 and Alzheimer‘s disease in a genome-wide study.Neuroreport18, 1761–1764 (2007).
  • Reiman EM , WebsterJA, MyersAJet al.: GAB2 alleles modify Alzheimer‘s risk in APOE ε4 carriers.Neuron54, 713–720 (2007).
  • Papassotiropoulos A , StephanDA, HuentelmanMJet al.: Common KIBRA alleles are associated with human memory performance.Science314, 475–478 (2006).
  • Almeida OP , SchwabSG, LautenschlagerNTet al.: KIBRA genetic polymorphism influences episodic memory in later life, but does not increase the risk of mild cognitive impairment.J. Cell. Mol. Med.12, 1672–1676 (2008).
  • Nacmias B , BessiV, BagnoliSet al.: KIBRA gene variants are associated with episodic memory performance in subjective memory complaints.Neurosci. Lett.436, 145–147 (2008).
  • Schaper K , KolschH, PoppJ, WagnerM, JessenF: KIBRA gene variants are associated with episodic memory in healthy elderly.Neurobiol. Aging29, 1123–1125 (2008).
  • Need AC , AttixDK, McEvoyJMet al.: Failure to replicate effect of KIBRA on human memory in two large cohorts of European origin.Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet.147B, 667–668 (2008).
  • Rodriguez-Rodriguez E , InfanteJ, LlorcaJet al.: Age-dependent association of KIBRA genetic variation and Alzheimer‘s disease risk.Neurobiol. Aging30, 322–324 (2009).
  • Corneveaux JJ , LiangWS, ReimanEMet al.: Evidence for an association between KIBRA and late-onset Alzheimer‘s disease.Neurobiol. Aging DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.07.014 (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
  • Reiman EM , ChenK, AlexanderGEet al.: Functional brain abnormalities in young adults at genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer‘s dementia.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 284–289 (2004).
  • Reiman EM , ChenK, AlexanderGEet al.: Correlations between apolipoprotein E ε4 gene dose and brain-imaging measurements of regional hypometabolism.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102, 8299–8302 (2005).
  • Alexander GE , FureyML, GradyCLet al.: Association of premorbid intellectual function with cerebral metabolism in Alzheimer‘s disease: implications for the cognitive reserve hypothesis.Am. J. Psychiatry154, 165–172 (1997).
  • Katzman R , TerryR, DeTeresaRet al.: Clinical, pathological, and neurochemical changes in dementia: a subgroup with preserved mental status and numerous neocortical plaques.Ann. Neurol.23, 138–144 (1988).
  • Whalley LJ , DearyIJ, AppletonCL, StarrJM: Cognitive reserve and the neurobiology of cognitive aging.Ageing Res. Rev.3, 369–382 (2004).
  • Buckner RL , SnyderAZ, ShannonBJet al.: Molecular, structural, and functional characterization of Alzheimer‘s disease: evidence for a relationship between default activity, amyloid, and memory.J. Neurosci.25, 7709–7717 (2005).
  • Traer CJ , RutherfordAC, PalmerKJet al.: SNX4 coordinates endosomal sorting of TfnR with dynein-mediated transport into the endocytic recycling compartment.Nat. Cell Biol.9, 1370–1380 (2007).
  • Cataldo AM , PeterhoffCM, TroncosoJCet al.: Endocytic pathway abnormalities precede amyloid β deposition in sporadic Alzheimer‘s disease and Down syndrome: differential effects of APOE genotype and presenilin mutations.Am. J. Pathol.157, 277–286 (2000).
  • de Quervain DJ , PapassotiropoulosA: Identification of a genetic cluster influencing memory performance and hippocampal activity in humans.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 4270–4274 (2006).
  • Marchini J , DonnellyP, CardonLR: Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases.Nat. Genet.37, 413–417 (2005).
  • Kahvejian A , QuackenbushJ, ThompsonJF: What would you do if you could sequence everything?Nat. Biotechnol.26, 1125–1133 (2008).
  • Schuster SC : Next-generation sequencing transforms today‘s biology.Nat. Methods5, 16–18 (2008).
  • Shendure J , JiH: Next-generation DNA sequencing.Nat. Biotechnol.26, 1135–1145 (2008).

Websites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.