Cost-effectiveness of a voucher-based intervention for smoking cessation

ABSTRACT

Background: Contingency management (CM) has been shown to be effective in reducing smoking consumption, but has traditionally been criticized for its costs. Objectives: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of using a voucher-based CM protocol added to a cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) for smoking cessation among treatment-seeking patients from the general population. Methods: A total of 92 patients were randomly assigned to CBT or CBT plus CM for abstinence. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated by dividing the increase in costs by the increase in effects (continuous abstinence, longest duration of abstinence at 6-month follow-up and cotinine results during the treatment). An acceptability curve illustrated the statistical uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness estimate. We also determined the optimum cost per participant for predicting the smoking status at 6-month follow-up. Results: The average cost per participant in the CBT condition was €138.73 (US$ 150.23) as opposed to €411.61 (US$ 445.73) in the CBT plus CM condition (p < 0.01). The incremental cost of using voucher-based CM to increase the number of participants that maintained abstinence at 6-month follow-up by one extra participant was €68.22 (US$ 73.88), and to lengthen the longest duration of abstinence by 1 week was €53.92 (US$ 58.39). The incremental cost to obtain an extra cotinine-negative result was €181.90 (US$ 196.98). Conclusion: Compared with CBT alone, the voucher-based protocol required additional costs but achieved significantly better outcomes. These results will allow stakeholders to make policy decisions about CM implementation for smoking cessation in the broader community.

KEYWORDS:

• Cost-effectiveness
• smoking cessation
• contingency management
• community setting

Funding

Work on this manuscript was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) Grant (PSI2011-22804) and the Predoctoral Grant BP12-037, from the Foundation for the Promotion of Applied Scientific Research and Technology in Asturias (FICYT).

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Funding

Work on this manuscript was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) Grant (PSI2011-22804) and the Predoctoral Grant BP12-037, from the Foundation for the Promotion of Applied Scientific Research and Technology in Asturias (FICYT).