![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
The value of routine coagulation testing instead of bleeding history alone in children, to predict bleeding risk prior to tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy has been questioned. Our objectives are to identify the causes of abnormal PT and/or aPTT in these patients, and to determine whether routine preoperative coagulation testing is effective in identifying children with a clinically significant coagulation abnormality prior to undergoing a procedure. In this study, data were extracted by chart review for 854 patients referred to the pediatric hematology service at Stony Brook University for the evaluation of an elevated PT and/or aPTT on preoperative testing. Seven hundred and ninety two of 854 reviewed charts (92.7%) contained sufficient data for analysis. On repeat testing, 393 (49.6%) had a laboratory abnormality identified. A potentially significant coagulation abnormality was identified in 32 of 792 patients (4%). For the remaining 760 patients, the most common diagnosis was a lupus anticoagulant (n = 98, 24.6%) or a “presumed” lupus anticoagulant (n = 166, 41.6%). A positive personal or family bleeding history was documented in 268 patients (268/792 = 33.8%). Of these patients, only 107 (39.9%) had an abnormality identified on further work-up. Seventeen of the 32 patients with clinically significant bleeding disorders identified were found to have a positive bleeding history (17/32 = 53.1%). Routine preoperative coagulation testing identifies only a small number of children at increased risk for surgical bleeding. However, a “positive” bleeding history identifies only 60% of children found to have a clinically significant coagulation abnormality. Routine preoperative coagulation testing may serve as a useful adjunct to clinical history.