1,053
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Supporting self-determination

Talking to producers of Easy Read health information for people with intellectual disability: Production practices, textual features, and imagined audiences

Pages 410-420 | Published online: 08 Mar 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Concerns about health inequalities experienced by people with intellectual disability (ID) have led to many health information materials being created in an “Easy Read” format. This study aimed to understand the practices involved in making information accessible.

Methods: Individual, pair and group interviews were conducted involving people with and without ID based in non-profit organisations, academic, and health service settings. Thematic analysis addressed the creation of Easy Read health resources, the format and content of the texts, and how producers imagine the texts are received by potential audiences.

Results: Little consensus emerged of the best way to produce Easy Read health information. Lacking systematic feedback, participants described imagined audiences and contexts for their reception.

Conclusions: Production of Easy Read resources has become widespread despite current limited evidence of impact. Interactions between social groups involved in the production process and the wider policy and legislative context contribute to this situation.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Ben Rampton, Susan Buell, Chris Hatton and Katy Brinkley for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. I would also like to express my appreciation for the thoughtful and considered feedback and advice I received from the two anonymous reviewers of my original submission, as well as for guidance offered by the journal editor.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

Deborah Chinn has been funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) post doctoral fellowship [grant number PDF-2013-06-060]. The article presents independent research funded by NIHR. The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. No restrictions on free access to or publication of the research data has been imposed by the funding body.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 400.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.