613
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
COMMENTARY

HRT and breast cancer risk: a realistic perspective

, , &
Pages 633-636 | Received 22 Mar 2011, Accepted 27 Apr 2011, Published online: 24 Aug 2011
 

ABSTRACT

A new analysis from the Women's Health Initiative included data on breast cancer incidence over a 11-year period from the randomized trial of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and a subsequent observational follow-up. The conclusions were that CEE/MPA use was associated with an increase in both breast cancer incidence and mortality. We have concerns over the validity of their statistical analyses, as adjustments for baseline characteristics or for multiple comparisons demonstrate no significant differences in incidence between those allocated to CEE/MPA or placebo. We suspect that the apparent increase in mortality is the result of surveillance and detection bias rather than a true cause and effect. Even if such an effect were true, mortality from breast cancer would still be a very rare event. We also question the clinical relevance and applicability of their findings. The data over the 11 years show no increased risk of breast cancer with CEE/MPA in women who had not previously used hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and the vast majority of women on HRT would not be prior users at initiation. It should be remembered that women using CEE alone showed a significant decrease in breast cancer risk in the WHI trial and follow-up. Even if combined estrogen–progestogen HRT did cause an increase in breast cancer risk, and this is not proven, the magnitude of that risk is small, and less than that risk seen with many lifestyle factors. HRT is a benefit, not a risk, for those women requiring it.

Conflict of interest J.C.S. has in the past received research grants from Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Novo Nordisk, Organon, Schering, Shire, Solvay, Wyeth and the UK Medical Research Council, and has served on Advisory Boards and/or received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer-Schering, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Proctor & Gamble, Servier, Solvay, Theramex and Wyeth/Pfizer. H.N.H. is the Principal Investigator of the Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol (ELITE) funded by the NIH, R01AG-024154, and has served in the past on advisory boards for Wyeth. J.H.P. is a former employee of Wyeth Research and has consulted for Wyeth, Depomed, BHR Pharma, Bionovo, and ASCEND Therapeutics. R.A.L has in the past received research grants from Organon, Novartis, Wyeth and NIH, and has served on advisory boards of Ortho, Bayer-Schering, Solvay, Pfizer, Merck and Wyeth; none currently.

Source of funding None declared for this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 277.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.