109
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The potential for floodplains to sustain biomass feedstock production systems

&
Pages 575-588 | Published online: 09 Apr 2014
 

Abstract

Production of biofuels from corn or other food crops is considered unsustainable in the long term since it creates artificial shortages in food supply, increases in food price, and subsequent socioeconomic and environmental concerns. Second-generation biofuels, however, have shown promise, with improvement in technologies for converting cellulosic feedstocks into liquid transportation fuels. The development of biomass feedstock production systems and advanced biofuel refineries in floodplains and marginal lands can generate up to 45 t of biomass and 14,000 l of advanced biofuel per hectare per year, achieving considerable offset in dependence on fossil fuel. Promising biomass species for floodplains include short-rotation trees such as poplar and willow, perennial grasses such as Miscanthus and switchgrass, and annuals such as high-biomass sorghum. However, river floodplains are often susceptible to flooding and drought events, partly due to the impact of climate change on hydrological cycles and human interventions such as the construction of dams and levees. In the USA, floodplain biofuel production systems could generate up to 30% of renewable biofuels by 2022 and provide additional benefits such as carbon sequestration, GHG reduction and ecosystem sustainability. However, successful implementation will depend on the social adaptability and economic viability of such systems.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Discussions with S Flick, P Nelson, B Hood, S Sachdev and M Gold were helpful in elaborating on the floodplains for biomass production concept.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 427.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.