The potential for floodplains to sustain biomass feedstock production systems

• Escobar JC, Lora ES, Venturini OJ, Yanez EE, Castillo EF, Almazan O. Biofuels: environment, technology and food security. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.13,1275–1287 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthrone P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science319,1235–1238 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harto C, Meyers R, Williams E. Life cycle water use of low-carbon transport fuels. Energy Policy38(9),4933–4944 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullander S. Food security: crops for people not for cars. Ambio39(3),249–256 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sexton S, Zilberman D. Beyond the food or biofuel dilemma. Biofuels2(4),361–363 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lal R. Land area for establishing biofuel plantations. Energy Sustain. Devel.10(2),67–79 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm WW, Johnson JMF, Karlen DL, Lightle DT. Corn stover to sustain soil organic carbon further constrains biomass supply. Agron. J.99,1665–1667(2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103,11206–11210 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high diversity grassland biomass. Science314,1598–1600 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries SC, van de Ven GWJ, van Ittersum MK, Giller KE. Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques. Biomass Bioenergy34,588–601 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynd LR, Laser MS, McBride J, Podkaminer K, Hamilton J. Energy Myth Three – High Land Requirements and an Unfavorable Energy Balance Preclude Biomass Ethanol from Playing a Large Role in Providing Energy Services. Sovacool BK, Brown MA (Eds). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 75–101 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC. Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: the Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• von Blottnitz H, Curran M. A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. J. Clean. Prod.15,607–619 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemus R, Lal R. Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.24,1–21(2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Wu M, Huo H. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types. Environ. Res. Lett.2(2),024001 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell JE, Lobell DB, Genova RC, Field CB. The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. Environ. Sci. Technol.42,5791–5794 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al. The value of the world’s ecosystems services and natural capital. Nature387,253–260 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeuber RA, Michener WK. Natural flood control. Issues Sci. Technol.15,74–81 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoms MC, Hill SM, Spry M et al. The geomorphology of the Darling Basin. In: The Barwon Darling Catchment. Breckwodth R, Boden R (Eds). Murray Darling Basin Commission, Canberra, Australia (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bayley PB. Understanding large river–floodplain ecosystems. Bioscience45,153–158 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks RE. Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. Bioscience45,168–182 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milly PCD, Wetherald RT, Dunne KA, Delworth TL. Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature415,514–517 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen JH, Christensen OB. Climate modelling: severe summertime flooding in Europe. Nature421,805–806 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beniston M, Stephenson DB, Christensen OB et al. Future extreme events in European climate: an exploration of regional climate model projections. Climatic Change81,71–95 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pall P, Aina T, Stone DA et al. Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature470,382–386 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman PK. Infrastructure, Natural Disasters, and Poverty. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Laxenburg, Austria (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ondarza PM, Gonzalez M, Fillmann G, Miglioranza KSB. Increasing levels of persistent organic pollutants in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) following a mega-flooding episode in the negro river basin, Argentinean Patagonia. Sci. Total Environ.419,233–239 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Motsholapheko MR, Kgathi DL, Vanderpost C. Rural livelihoods and household adaptation to extreme flooding in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Phys. Chem. Earth36(14–15),984–995 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sharma DP, Swarup A. Effect of short term waterlogging on growth, yield and mineral composition of wheat in sodic soils under field condition. Plant Soil107,137–143 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criss RE, Shock EL. Flood enhancement through flood control. Geology29,875–878 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinter N, Thomas R, Wlosinski JH. Regional impacts of levee construction and channelization, middle Mississippi River, USA. In: Flood Issues in Contemporary Water Management. Marsalek J et al. (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA, USA, 351–361 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Myers MF, White GF. The challenge of the Mississippi flood. Environment35(10),6–9, 25–35 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyen L, Dankers R, Bódis K Salamon P, Barredo J. Fluvial flood risk in Europe in present and future climates. Climatic Change112(1),47–62 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis SL, Brando PM, Phillips OL, van der Heijden GMF, Nepstad D. The 2010 Amazon drought. Science331(6017),554–557 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebmann B, Marengo JA. Interannual variability of the rainy season and rainfall in the Brazilian Amazon basin. J. Clim.14,4308–4317 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronchail J, Cochonneau G, Molinier M et al. Interannual rainfall variability in the Amazon Basin and SSTs in the equatorial Pacific and the tropical Atlantic oceans. Int. J. Climatol.22,1663–1686 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi YJ, Roberts TR, Betts AT, Kileen J, Li W, Nobre AC. Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science319,169–172, (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parolin P. Flood-tolerant trees of Amazonian floodplains also tolerate drought. Pesquisas Botânica61,7–38 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Dosskey MG, Bentrup G, Schoeneberger M. A role for agroforestry in forest restoration in the lower Mississippi alluvial valley. J. Forestry110(1),48–55 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Volk TA, Verwijst T, Tharakan PJ, Abrahamson LP, White EH. Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops. Front. Ecol. Environ.2,411–418 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan G, Negri MC, Wang M et al. Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol.43(15),6094–6100 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal GD, Agarwal AK. Environmental implications of using biomass as an alternative source of energy: a critical assessment. TERI Inf. Monitor Environ. Sci.4(2),79–86 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski I, Heinz A. Delayed harvest of Miscanthus – influences on biomass quantity and quality and environmental impacts of energy production. Eur. J. Agron.19,45–63 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venendaal R, Jørgensen U, Foster CA. European energy crops: a synthesis. Biomass Bioenergy13(3),147–185 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantineo M, D’Agosta GM, Copani V, Patane C, Cosentino SL. Biomass yield and energy balance of three perennial crops for energy use in the semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res.114,204–213(2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski TT. Physiological-ecological impacts of flooding on riparian forest ecosystems. Wetlands22,550–561 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nema AG, Khare AK. Effect of waterlogging on some forest plants. J. Trop. For.8,187–188 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski TT. Responses of woody plants to flooding. In: Flooding and Plant Growth. Kozlowski TT (Ed.). Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA, 129–164 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Amlin NM, Rood SB. Inundation tolerances of riparian willows and cottonwoods. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc.37,1709–1720 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rood SB, Nielsen JL, Shenton L, Gill KM, Letts MG. Effects of flooding on leaf development, transpiration, and photosynthesis in narrowleaf cottonwood, a willow-like poplar. Photosynth. Res.104,31–39 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Z, Huang J. Waterlogging tolerance and nutritional characteristics of main tree species in bank forest in Three Gorges reservoir area. Guizhou Agric. Sci.39,166–169 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Francis RA, Gurnell AM, Petts GE. Survival and growth response of Populus nigra, Salix eleagnos and Alnus incana cuttings to varying levels of hydric stress. For. Ecol. Manag.210,291–301(2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy JJ, Smart LB. Hydroponic screening of shrub willow (Salix spp.) for arsenic tolerance and uptake. Int. J. Phytoremediation10(6),515–528 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Dai S, Tang S et al. Growth, gas exchange, root morphology and cadmium uptake responses of poplars and willows grown on cadmium-contaminated soil to elevated CO2. Environ. Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1475-0 (2012) (Epub).
   Google Scholar
• Stolarski MJ, Szczukowski S, Tworkowski J, Wroblewska H, Krzyzaniak M. Short rotation willow coppice biomass as an industrial and energy feedstock. Ind. Crops Prod.33,217–223 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volk TA, Abrahamson LP, Nowak CA et al. The development of short-rotation willow in the northeastern United States for bioenergy and bioproducts, agroforestry and phytoremediation. Biomass Bioenergy30,715–727 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braatne JH, Rood SB, Heilman PE. Life history, ecology and conservation of riparian cottonwoods in North America: Chapter 3. In: Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. Stettler RF, Bradshaw JHD, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM (Eds). NRC Research Press, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 57–85 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Kalischuk AR, Rood SB, Mahoney JM. Environmental influences on seedling growth of cottonwood species following a major flood. For. Ecol. Manag.144,75–89 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floate KD. Extent and patterns of hybridization among the three species of Populus that constitute the riparian forest of southern Alberta, Canada. Can. J. Bot.82,253–264 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Du K, Xu L, Wu H, Tu B, Zheng B. Ecophysiological and morphological adaption to soil flooding of two poplar clones differing in flood-tolerance. Flora Morphol. Dist. Funct. Ecol. Plants207,96–106 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Cao FL, Conner WH. Selection of flood-tolerant Populus deltoides clones for reforestation projects in China. For. Ecol. Manag.117,211–220 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceulemans R, Deraedt W. Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture. For. Ecol. Manag.121,9–23 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roedl A. Production and energetic utilization of wood from short rotation coppice – a life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.15(6),567–578 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Fossati T, Patrignani G, Zapelli I, Sabatti M, Sala F, Castiglione S. Development of molecular markers to assess the level of introgression of Populus tremula into P. alba natural populations. Plant Breeding123,382–385 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loo M, Joseph JA, Heinze B, Fay MF, Lexer C. Clonality and spatial genetic structure in Populus × canescens and its sympatric backcross parent P. alba in a Central European hybrid zone. New Phytol.177,506–516 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jezowski S. Yield traits of six clones of Miscanthus in the first 3 yr following planting in Poland. Ind. Crop. Prod.27,65–68 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Beale CV, Long SP. The effects of nitrogen and irrigation on the productivity of the C4-grasses Miscanthus x giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides. Aspects Appl. Biol.49,225–230 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Maranville JW, Mason SC, Madhavan S. Physiological adaptations for nitrogen use efficiency in sorghum. Plant Soil245,25–34 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Orchard PW, Jessop RS. The response of sorghum and sunflower to short-term waterlogging. I. Effects of stage of development and duration of waterlogging on growth and yield. Plant Soil81,119–132 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray SC, Sharma A, Rooney WL et al. Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: I. QTL for stem sugar and grain nonstructural carbohydrates. Crop Sci.48,2165–2179 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocateli AC, Raper RL, Balkcom KS, Arriaga FJ, Bransby DI. Biomass sorghum production and components under different irrigation/tillage systems for the southeastern US. Ind. Crops Products36,589–598 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature457,551–556 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace ES, Jordan DR. Location of major effect genes in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Theor. Appl Gen.121(7),1339–1356 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogel KP, Gorz HJ, Haskins FA. Breeding grasses for the future. In: Breeding Forage and Turf Grasses, CSSA Special Publication 15. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Parrish DJ, Fike JH. The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.24,423–459 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultquist SJ, Vogel KP, Lee DJ, Arumuganathan K, Kaeppler S. Chloroplast DNA and nuclear DNA content variations among cultivars of switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L. Crop Sci.36,1049–1052 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter CL. An analysis of variance between upland and lowland switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L., in central Oklahoma. Ecology47,980–992 (1966).
   Google Scholar
• Knapp AK. Water relations and growth of three grasses during wet and drought years in a tallgrass prairie. Oecologia65,35–43 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• UN. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. UN, NY, USA (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy S. The Multilateral Trade and Investment Context for Biofuels: Issues and Challenges. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK and Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Minneapolis, MN, USA (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Charles MB, Ryan R, Ryan N, Oloruntoba R. Public policy and biofuels: the way forward? Energy Policy35,5737–5746 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archaux F, Martin H. Hybrid poplar plantations in a floodplain have balanced impacts on farmland and woodland birds. For. Ecol. Manag.257,1474–1479.
   Google Scholar
• Dauber J, Jones MB, Stout JC. The impact of biomass crop cultivation on temperate biodiversity. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy2(6),289–309 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Grigal DF, Berguson WE. Soil carbon changes associated with short-rotation systems. Biomass Bioenergy14,371–377 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Wood CW, Bransby DI. Soil management impacts on soil carbon sequestration by switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy18,469–477 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman MD, Isebrands JG, Tolsted DN, Tolbert VR. Comparing soil carbon of short rotation poplar plantations with agricultural crops and woodlots in North Central United States. Environ. Manag.33,S299–S308 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felten D, Emmerling C. Effects of bioenergy crop cultivation on earthworm communities – a comparative study of perennial (Miscanthus) and annual crops with consideration of graded land-use intensity. Appl. Soil Ecol.49,167–177 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn RA. Use of Animal Nutrition to Manage Nitrogen Emissions from Animal Agriculture. Maryland Feed Industry Council, Inc., College Park, MD, USA, 25–30 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Jones JR, Knowlton MF, Obrecht DV, Cook EA. Importance of landscape variables and morphology on nutrients in Missouri reservoirs. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.61,1503–1512 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udawatta RP, Jose S. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry practices in temperate North America. In: Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems – Opportunities and Challenges. Kumar BM, Nair PKR (Eds). Springer, NY, USA, 17–42 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Udawatta RP, Motavalli PP, Garrett HE, Krstansky JJ. Nitrogen and nitrate losses in runoff from three adjacent corn-soybean watersheds. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.117,39–48 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz RC, Isenhart TM, Colletti JP et al. Riparian and upland buffer practices. Chapter 8. In: North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice (2nd Edition). Garrett HE (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Allen SB, Dwyer JP, Wallace DC, Cook EA. Missouri River Flood of 1993: role of woody corridor width in levee protection. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc.39(4),923–933 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan S, Jose S, Biswas S, Kabir K, Rogers W. Biodiversity in home gardens in Bangladesh – a comparison. Agrofor. Syst.85,29–34 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Z, Zhuang Q, Chen M. Impacts of land use change due to biofuel crops on carbon balance, bioenergy production, and agricultural yield, in the conterminous United States. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy4(3),277–288 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pallardy SG, Gibbins DE, Rhoads JL. Biomass production by two-year-old poplar clones on floodplain sites in Lower Midwest, USA. Agrofor. Syst.59,21–26 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang S, Xue J, Tang L. Biomass production and carbon sequestration potential in poplar plantations with different management patterns. J. Environ. Manage.85,672–679 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutchen BF, Avant RV, Baltensperger D. High-tonnage dedicated energy crops: the potential of sorghum and energy cane. Presented at: The Twentieth Annual Conference of the National Agricultural Biotechnology Council. Columbus, OH, USA, 3–5 June 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Adegbidi HG, Volk TA, White EH et al. Biomass and nutrient removal by willow clones in experimental bioenergy plantations in New York State. Biomass Bioenergy20,399–411 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolarski M, Szczukowski S, Tworkowski J, Klasa A. Productivity of seven clones of willow coppice in annual and perennial cutting cycles. Biomass Bioenergy32,1227–1234 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmel C, Lewandowski I, Claupein W. Comparing annual and perennial energy cropping systems with different management intensities. Agric. Syst.96,224–236 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tworkowski J, Szczukowski S, Stolarski M. [Yielding ability and some morphological features of willow grown in Eco-Salix system]. Fragm. Agron.27(4),135–146 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Deckmyn G, Laureysens I, Garcia J, Muys B, Ceulemans R. Poplar growth and yield in short rotation coppice: model simulations using the process model SECRETS. Biomass Bioenergy26(3),221–227 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Paris P, Mareschi L, Sabatti M et al. Comparing hybrid Populus clones for SRF across northern Italy after two biennial rotations: survival, growth and yield. Biomass Bioenergy35,1524–1532 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pearson CH, Halvorson AD, Moench RD, Hammon RW. Production of hybrid poplar under short-term, intensive culture in western Colorado. Ind. Crops Products31(3),492–498 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Guo XY, Zhang XS. Performance of 14 hybrid poplar clones grown in Beijing, China. Biomass Bioenergy34(6),906–911 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Behnke GD, David MB, Voigt TB. Greenhouse gas emissions, nitrate leaching, and biomass yields from production of Miscanthus x giganteus in Illinois, USA. Bioenergy Res. doi:10.1007/s12155–012–9191–9195 (2012) (Epub).
   Google Scholar
• Gauder M, Graeff-Hoenninger S, Claupein W. The impact of a growing bioethanol industry on food production in Brazil. Appl. Energy88,672–679 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Strullu L, Cadoux S, Preudhomme M, Jeuffroy M, Beaudoin N. Biomass production and nitrogen accumulation and remobilisation by Miscanthus x giganteus as influenced by nitrogen stocks in belowground organs. Field Crops Res.121,381–391 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kering MK, Biermacher JT, Twain TJ, Mosali J, Guretzky JA. Biomass yield and nutrient responses of switchgrass to phosphorus application. Bioenergy Res.5(1),71–78 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Knoll JE, Anderson WF, Strickland TC, Hubbard RK, Mali, R. Low-input production of biomass from perennial grasses in the coastal plain of Georgia, USA. Bioenergy Res.5,206–214 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West DR, Kincer DR. Yield of switchgrass as affected by seeding rates and dates. Biomass Bioenergy35,4057–4059 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djomo SN, Kasmioui OE, Ceulemans R. Energy and greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy production from poplar and willow: a review. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy3,181–197 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snider JL, Raper RL, Schwab EB. The effect of row spacing and seeding rate on biomass production and plant stand characteristics of non-irrigated photoperiod-sensitive sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Ind. Crops Products37,527–535 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• World Energy Outlook Factsheet. www.vcl.li/bilder/563.pdf (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. www.ipcc.ch/publications and data/ar4/wg1/en/contents.html (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• The Energy Independence and Security Act. www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr6enr/pdf/BILLS-110hr6enr.pdf (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• European Biofuels Technology Platform. www.biofuelstp.eu/overview.html (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• SCOPE. Biofuels: environmental consequences and interactions with changing land use. http://cip.cornell.edu/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=scope (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. Mitchell D. A note on rising food prices. www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/foodprices (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Eidman VR. Agriculture’s role in energy production: current levels and future prospects. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/7628/1/cp05ei01.pdf (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Renewable Fuels Association. Factsheet: ethanol and the US corn crop. www.ethanolrfa.org/page/-/objects/documents/1898/corn_use_facts.pdf (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• US Corn Farm Price. Corn Prices. http://ycharts.com/indicators/corn_price. (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• US Geological Survey. Red River of the North at Fargo, ND, USA. http://nd.water.usgs.gov/floodtracking/charts/05054000_09020104.html (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Reuters 2001. No relief in sight for Texas heat and drought. www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/05/us-weather-idUSTRE7745CG20110805 (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• World Meteorological Organization Declaracíon de la OMM sobre El Estado del Clima Mundial en 2003. www.wmo.int (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• USDA Biofuels Strategic Production Report. www.usda.gov/documents/USDA_Biofuels_Report_6232010.pdf (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Energy and US Department of Agriculture. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. http://feedstockreview.ornl.gov/pdf/billion_ton_vision.pdf (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Battelle Report. Regional Strategy for Biobased Products in the Mississippi Delta. www.agbioworks.org/regional.cfm (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• McGraw RL, Houx JH. Flood tolerance of herbaceous grasses and legumes. http://crops.confex.com/crops/2006am/techprogram/P22750.HTM (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Round Table on Sustainable Development, OECD. Biofuels: is the cure worse than the disease? www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/46/39348696.pdf (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Hodur NM, Leistritz L. Economic impacts of biofuel development. www.agmrc.org/renewable_energy/biofuelsbiorefining_general/economic_impacts_of_biofuel_development.cfm (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• GreenAir Report. FedEx CEO commits to his freighter fleet meeting 30 percent of its aviation fuel use from biofuels by 2030. www.greenaironline.com/news.php?viewStory=444 (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Dowling J. Improving energy security with the great green fleet: the case for transitioning from ethanol to drop-in renewable fuels. www.law.gwu.edu/News/newsstories/Documents/2012_Dowling_Article.pdf (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• National Weather Service. http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/hydrograph.php?wfo=lsx&gage=hrnm7 (Accessed 11 June 2012)
   Google Scholar