How Braess’ paradox solves Newcomb's problemFootnote*Preliminary versions of this paper were read at the annual Dubrovnik Philosophy of Science Conference on 11 April 1992 and at the University of Victoria on 9 March 1993. Thanks go to members of both audiences, as well as to Adam Constabaris, Eric Borm, Colin Gartner, Joan Irvine, Kieren MacMillan, Steven Savitt and Jeff Tupper for their helpful comments. In addition, special thanks goes to Leslie Burkholder and Louis Marinoff whose many detailed suggestions and ideas were crucial in the writing of this paper.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.