Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up

A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014

Gro S DyrhovdenNorwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; ;Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), Faculty of Medicine and Dentristy, University of Bergen, Bergen; Correspondence[email protected]

Anne M FenstadNorwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen;

Ove FurnesNorwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; ;Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), Faculty of Medicine and Dentristy, University of Bergen, Bergen;

Øystein GøthesenNorwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; ;Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), Faculty of Medicine and Dentristy, University of Bergen, Bergen; ;Orthopaedic Department, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway

Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up

A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up

A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014

Reprints and Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date