Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements

A Norwegian–Australian registry study, 2003–2014

Oystein GothesenNorwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; ;Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen; ;Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haugesund Hospital, Helse Fonna HF, Haugesund; Correspondence[email protected]

Stein Hakon L LygreNorwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; ;Department of Occupational Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway;

Michelle LorimerAOA (Australian Orthopaedic Association) National Joint Replacement Registry, SAHMRI (South Australia Health and Research Institute), Adelaide, Australia

Stephen GravesAOA (Australian Orthopaedic Association) National Joint Replacement Registry, SAHMRI (South Australia Health and Research Institute), Adelaide, Australia

Ove FurnesNorwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; ;Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen;

Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements

A Norwegian–Australian registry study, 2003–2014

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements

A Norwegian–Australian registry study, 2003–2014

Reprints and Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date