Partner support, social-cognitive variables and their role in adherence to self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes

References

• International Diabetes Federation. www.idf.org/atlasmap/atlasmap [ accessed 4 Nov 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Portuguese Society of Diabetology. www.minsaude.pt/NR/rdonlyres/219DAD78-CD13-43CE-9221-42744B24176C/O/EstudoprevalenciaDiabetesemPortugal.pdf [ accessed 26 Nov 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Observatório Nacional da Diabetes. www.portaldasaude.pt/NR/rdonlyres/4747F2BE-D534-4983-9A94-C5B7066C9731/0/i012326.pdf [ accessed 12 Sept 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Rubin RR. Adherence to pharmacological therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 2005;118(Suppl 5A):27S1–34S.
   Google Scholar
• Yeaw J, et al. Comparing adherence and persistence across 6 chronic medication classes. J Managed Care Pharmacy 2009;15:728–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Manstead ASR. Changing health-related behaviors: an approach based on the theory of planned behavior. In: van den Bos V, et al, eds. The scope of social psychology: Theory and applications. New York: Psychology Press, 2006;43–63.
   Google Scholar
• Arafijo-Soares V, et al Predicting changes in physical activity among intention, action planning and coping planning. Health Educ Res 2009;24:128–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darker C, et al. An intervention to promote walking amongst the general population based on an extended theory of planned behavior: a waiting list randomized controlled trial. Psychol Health 2010;25:71–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatt S, Sammut R. An exploratory study of predictors of self-care behavior in persons with type 2 diabetes. Int j Nurs Stud 2008;45: 1525–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf [ accessed 21 Nov 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec is Process 1991;50:179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhi J, Beckmann J, eds. Action control: from cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer, 1985;11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne JC, Smith DA. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy. J Fam Psychol 1994; 8:43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Trief PM, et al Describing support: a qualitative study of couples living with diabetes. Fam Syst Health 2003; 21:57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Chesla CA, et al. Family predictors of disease management over one year in Latino and European American patients with type 2 diabetes. Fam Process 2003;42:375–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher L, et al The family and disease management in Hispanic and Euro-American patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23: 267–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens MA, et al. Spouses use of social control to improve diabetic patients' dietary adherence. Fam Syst Health 2010;28:199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schokker MC, et al Support behavior and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with diabetes: main and moderating effects. Fam Psychol 2010;24:578–86.
   Google Scholar
• Toobert DJ, et al The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure. Diabetes Care 2000;23:943–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira MG, et al Research version of the Planned Behavior Questionnaire - Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose. University of Minho, School of Psychology, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot F, et al The assessment of diabetes-related cognitive and social factors: the Multidimensional Diabetes Questionnaire. J Behav Med 1997; 20:291–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The modera-tor-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:1173–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trief PM, et al Family environment, glycemic control, and the psychosocial adaptation of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998;21:241–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trief, PM, et al A prospective analysis of marital relationship factors and quality of life in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1154–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garay-Sevilla ME, et al Adherence to treatment and social support in patients with NIDDM. J Diabetes Complications 1995;9:81–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg CA, Upchurch R. A develop-mental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull 2007;133:920–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaGreca AM, et al. I get by with a little help from my family and friends: adolescents' support for diabetes care. J Pediatr Psychol 1995;20:449–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-man-agement a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav 2003; 30:170–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trief PM, et al. The marital relation-ship and psychosocial adaptation and glycemic control of individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24:1384–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trief PM, et al. The relationship between marital quality and adherence to the diabetes care regimen. Ann Behav Med 2004;27:148–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher L. Family relationships and diabetes care during the adult years. Diabetes Spectr 2006;19:71–4.
   Google Scholar
• van Dam HA, et al Social support in diabetes: a systematic review of controlled intervention studies. Patient Educ Couns 2005;59:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos F. O papel das esposas na adesão ao regime terapeutico no diabetic° tipo 2. In: Leal I, et al., eds. Actas do 6° Congress° Nacional de Psicologia da SaUde. Lisboa: ISPA, 2006;571–7.
   Google Scholar
• Daly J, et al. An assessment of attitudes, behaviors, and outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:280–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar