Linking science and decision making to promote an ecology for the city: practices and opportunities

Literature Cited

• Armitage, D., F. Berkes, A. Dale, E. Kocho‐schellenberg, and E. Patton. 2011. Co‐management and the co‐production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Global Environmental Change 21:995–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. K., E. S. Svendsen, and L. A. Roman. 2016. Knowledge co‐production at the research–practice interface: embedded case studies from urban forestry. Environmental Management 57:1262–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernea, M. M. 1991. Putting People First: sociological variables in rural development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, D. L., S. T. Pickett, J. M. Grove, L. Ogden, and A. Whitmer. 2014. Advancing urban sustainability theory and action: challenges and opportunities. Landscape and Urban Planning 125:320–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, D. L., M. L. Cadenasso, J. M. Grove, V. Marshall, B. Mcgrath, and S. T. A. Pickett. 2015. An ecology for cities: a transformational nexus of design and ecology to advance climate change resilience and urban sustainability. Sustainability 7:3774–3791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J. 2007. Environmental risk, uncertainty, and participation: mapping an emergent epistemic community. Environment and Planning A 40:2990–3008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, J. J., E. S. Svendsen, D. R. Fisher, and L. K. Campbell. 2013. Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landscape and Urban Planning 109:76–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, S. et al., 2013. Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environmental Science & Policy 28(Suppl 6):60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craglia, M. et al., 2012. Digital Earth 2020: towards the vision for the next decade. International Journal of Digital Earth 5:4–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R., L. K. Campbell, and E. S. Svendsen. 2012. The organisational structure of urban environmental stewardship. Environmental Politics 21:26–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, N., J. M. Grove, S. T. A. Pickett, and C. L. Redman. 2000. Integrated approaches to long‐term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience 50:571–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, J. M. 2014. Expanding the vision of the experimental forest and range network to urban areas. Pages 631–652 in D. C. Hayes, S. L. Stout, R. H. Crawford, and A. P. Hoover, editors. Expanding the vision of the experimental forest and range network to urban areas. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, J. M., M. L. Cadenasso, S. T. A. Pickett, W. R. Burch, and G. E. Machlis. 2015a. The Baltimore School of Urban Ecology: space, scale, and time for the study of cities. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, J. M., R. R. Chowdhury, and D. L. Childers. 2015b. Co‐design, co‐production, and dissemination of social‐ecological knowledge to promote sustainability and resilience: urban experiences from the U.S. Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) network. Global Land Project News 11:6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, G. W., K. T. Belt, W. Stack, K. Burgess, J. M. Grove, B. Caplan, M. Hardcastle, D. Shelley, S. T. A. Pickett, and P. M. Groffman. 2013. Socioecological revitalization of an urban watershed. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegger, D., M. Lamers, A. Van zeijl‐rozema, and C. Cieperink. 2012. Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action. Environmental Science & Policy 18:52–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., editor. 2004. States of knowledge: the co‐production of science and social order. Routledge, New York, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2010. A new climate for society. Theory, Culture, and Society 27:233–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. L., and C. M. Swan. 2014. Drivers of vegetation species diversity and composition in urban ecosystems. Pages 75–90 in R. A. Mccleery, M. N. Peterson, and C. E. Moorman, editors. Urban Wildlife conservation. Springer, US.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, D. H., J. M. Grove, and C. Murphy. 2013. Applications of urban tree canopy assessment and prioritization tools: supporting collaborative decision making to achieve urban sustainability goals applications of urban tree canopy assessment and prioritization tools. Cities and the Environment 6:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mauser, W., G. Klepper, M. Rice, B. S. Schmalzbauer, H. Hackmann, R. Leemans, and H. Moore. 2013. Transdisciplinary global change research: the co‐creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5:420–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, S. S., E. S. Svendsen, L. Knigge, H. Wang, H. D. Palmer, and M. E. Northridge. 2016. Urban greening as a social movement. Pages 243–248 in J. D. Gatrell, R. R. Jensen, M. W. Patterson, and N. Hoalst‐pullen, editors. Urban sustainability: policy and praxis. Geotechnologies and the environment. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz‐erickson, T. A. 2014. Co‐production of knowledge‐action systems in urban sustainable governance: the KASA approach. Environmental Science & Policy 37:182–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl‐wostl, C., C. Giupponi, K. Richards, C. Binder, A. de Sherbinin, D. Sprinz, T. Toonen, and C. van Bers. 2013. Transition towards a new global change science: requirements for methodologies, methods, data and knowledge. Environmental Science & Policy 28:36–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. A., J. G. Kramer, J. Boyd, and D. Hawthorne. 2016. Practices for facilitating interdisciplinary synthetic research: the National Socio‐Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC). Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 19:111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, S. T. A., W. R. Burch Jr., and S. Dalton. 1997. Integrated urban ecosystem research. Urban Ecosystems 1:183–184.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, S. T., K. T. Belt, M. F. Galvin, P. M. Groffman, J. M. Grove, D. C. Outen, R. V. Pouyat, W. P. Stack, and M. L. Cadenasso. 2007. Watersheds in Baltimore, Maryland: understanding and application of integrated ecological and social processes. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 136:44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, S. T. A., C. G. Boone, B. P. Mcgrath, M. L. Cadenasso, D. L. Childers, L. A. Ogden, M. Mchale, and J. M. Grove. 2013. Ecological science and transformation to the sustainable city. Cities 32:S10–S20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, S. T. A. et al., 2016. Dynamic heterogeneity: a framework to promote ecological integration and hypothesis generation in urban systems. Urban Ecosystems 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romolini, M. 2012. Governance of 21st Century Sustainable Cities: Examining Stewardship Networks in Baltimore & Seattle. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Romolini, M., J. M. Grove, C. L. Ventriss, C. J. Koliba, and D. H. Krymkowski. 2016. Toward an understanding of citywide urban environmental governance: an examination of stewardship networks in Baltimore and Seattle. Environmental Management 58:254–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield, P. L. 1992. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine 35:1343–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C. A., D. L. Childers, L. Turnbull, R. Upham, and N. A. Weller. 2016. Aridland constructed treatment wetlands II: macrophyte‐driven control of the wetland water budget makes the system more efficient than expected. Ecological Engineering, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur's quadrant – basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, E. S., and L. K. Campbell. 2008. Urban ecological stewardship: understanding the structure, function and network of community‐based urban land management. Cities and the Environment 1:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, E. S. et al., 2016. Stewardship mapping and assessment project: a framework for understanding community‐based environmental stewardship. Gen. Tech. Rep. 156.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA, 134 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, C. J., F. R. Adler, N. B. Grimm, P. M. Groffman, S. A. Levin, J. Munshi‐south, D. E. Pataki, M. Pavao‐zuckerman, and W. G. Wilson. 2014. Urban ecology: advancing science and society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12:574–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M., and M. Warburton. 1985. Knowing where to hit it: a conceptual framework for the sustainable development of the Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development 5:203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van kerkhoff, L., and L. Lebel. 2006. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31:445–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, C., S. C. Moser, R. E. Kasperson, and G. D. Dabelko. 2007. Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environmental Change 17:349–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, N. A., D. L. Childers, L. Turnbull, and R. Upham. 2016. Aridland constructed treatment wetlands I: macrophyte productivity, community composition, and nitrogen uptake. Ecological Engineering. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. F. 1991. Participatory action research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C. 2015. Co‐productive governance: a relational framework for adaptive governance. Global Environmental Change 30:56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar