The Relational Unconscious: a Core Element of Intersubjectivity, Thirdness, and Clinical Process

REFERENCES

• Arlow, J. (1979). The genesis of interpretation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assoc., 27: 193–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (1999). Clinical choices and the relational matrix. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 9: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M. (1993). The mind of the analyst: from listening to interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 74: 15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., Lachmann, F. & Jaffe, J. (1997). Mother—infant interaction structure and pre-symbolic self and object representations. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 7(2): 133–182.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1995). Like Subjects, Love Objects. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: an intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanal. Q., 73: 5–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E. (2000). Psychoanalytic supervision: the intersubjective development. Int. J. Psychoanal., 81: 273–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. (1999). Countertransference: our new royal road to the unconscious? Psychoanal. Dialogues, 9(3): 275–299.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. (1962). Learning from Experience. London: Karnac, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, B. (1972). Notes on transference: universal phenomenon and hardest part of analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 20: 267–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatt, S. & Blass, R. (1990). Attachment and separateness: a dialectical model of the products and processes of psychological development. Psychoanal. Study Child, 44: 107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q., 59: 550–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1992). Being a Character New York: Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Boston Change Study Process Group (2002). Explicating the implicit: the local level and microprocess of change in the analytic situation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 83: 1051–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, R. (1998). Subjectivity, objectivity and potential space. In Belief and Imagination. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, R. (2004). Subjectivity, objectivity, and triangular space. Psychoanal. Q., 73: 47–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. & Miller, M. (2002). The triadic intersubjective matrix in supervision: the use of disclosure to work through painful affects. Int. J. Psychoanal., 83: 811–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, W, (2001). Pathways of emotional communication. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 21(1): 40–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavell, M. (1988). Interpretation, psychoanalysis and the philosophy of mind. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36(4): 859–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavell, M. (1998). Triangulation, one’s own mind, and objectivity. Int. J. Psychoanal., 79: 449–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasseguet-Smirgel, J. (1974). Perversion, idealisation and sublimation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 55: 349–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (1998a). Countertransference disclosure and the conceptualization of analytic technique. Psychoanal. Q., 67(1): 128–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (1998b). Analyst subjectivity, analyst disclosure, and the aims of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Q., 67: 379–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crastnopol, M. (1997). Incognito or not? The patient’s subjective experience of the analyst’s private life. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 7(2): 257–278.
   Google Scholar
• Crastnopol, M. (1999). The analyst’s professional self as a “third” influence on the dyad: when the analyst writes about the treatment. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 9: 445–470.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the Self, Constructing America. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (1996). Linking the “pre-analytic” with the postclassical: integration, dissociation, and the multiplicity of unconscious process. Contemp. Psychoanal., 32: 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, D. (1992). The Intimate Edge: Extending the Reach of Psychoanalytic Interaction New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Eliot, T. S. (1922). The Complete Poems and Plays, 1909–1950. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, A. & Spezzano, C. (2000). Psychoanalysis at Its Limits: Navigating the Post-Modern Turn. London: Free Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emde, R. (1990). Mobilizing fundamental modes of development: empathic availability and therapeutic action. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38: 881–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, G. (1999). Knowing another from a dynamic systems point of view: the need for a multimodal concept of empathy. Psychoanal. Q., 68: 376–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psychoanalysis. S. E., 12.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1913). The disposition to obsessional neurosis. S. E., 12.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism. S. E., 14.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. S. E., 14.
   Google Scholar
• Frie, R. & Reis, B. (2001). Understanding intersubjectivity: psychoanalytic formulations and their philosophical underpinnings. Contemp. Psychoanal., 37(2): 297–327.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. & Natterson, J. (1999). Enactments: an intersubjective perspective. Psychoanal. Q., 68: 220–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. (1994). Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, S. (1996). Neutrality, resistance, and self-disclosure in an intersubjective psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 6: 623–647.
   Google Scholar
• Ginot, E. (2001). The holding environment and intersubjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 70(2): 417–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (1975). The analyst, symbolization and absence in the analytic setting. Int. J. Psychoanal., 56: 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2000). The intrapsychic and intersubjective in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Q., 69: 1–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemp. Psychoanal., 19: 389–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (1998). Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, E. (2003). The Social Unconscious. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. (1999). On the question of self-disclosure by the analyst: error or advance in technique? Psychoanal. Q., 68: 159–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. (2001). On unconscious communications and covert enactments: some reflections on their role in the analytic situation. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 21(1): 4–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javier, R. & Rendon, M. (1995). The ethnic unconscious and its role in transference, resistance, and countertransference: an introduction. Psychoanal. Psychol., 12(4): 513–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. (1946). The psychology of the transference. In The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, ed. M. Fordham & R. F. C. Hull. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A Selection, trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Norto.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, J. (1990). Love and Its Place in Nature New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, H. & Friedman, R. (2000). Intersubjectivity and interaction in the analytic relationship: a mainstream view. Psychoanal. Q., 69: 63–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1974, pp. 221–256.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. (1979). Reflections on the psychoanalytic process. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1974, pp. 372–383.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). The two-person unconscious: intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 19: 576–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K. & Boston Change Study Process Group (1998). Implicit relational knowing: its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health J., 19: 282–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main, M. (2000). The organized categories of infant, child, and adult attachment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 48: 1055–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroda, K. (1991). The Power of Countertransference. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Matte-Blanco, I. (1975). The Unconscious as Infinite Sets London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, E. (1996). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity of clinical facts. Int. J. Psychoanal., 77: 709–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. (1988). The analyst’s insights. Psychoanal. Q., 62(3): 370–389.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, W. (2002). The problem of self-disclosure in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50: 827–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1997). Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1998). The analyst’s knowledge and authority. Psychoanal. Q., 67(1): 1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrani, J. (1995). Toward an understanding of unmentalized experience. Psychoanal. Q., 64: 68–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momigliano, L. & Robutti, A. (1992). Shared Experience: The Psychoanalytic Dialogue London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J. (1996). Beyond the Psychoanalytic Dyad New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (1994a). The analytical third: working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75(1), 3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (1994b). Subjects of Analysis. New York: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D. (1995). Emotional Understanding. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. (1972). Charles S. Peirce: The Essential Writings, ed. E. C. Moore. New York: Harper & Ro.
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 62: 553–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1995). The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanal. Q., 64: 466–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanal. Q., 65: 495–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1997). Conscious and unconscious use of the self. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 17: 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1998). The analyst’s subjectivity and the analyst’s objectivity. Int. J. Psychoanal., 79: 487–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1999). Playing one’s cards face up in analysis: an approach to the problem of disclosure. Psychoanal. Q., 68: 521–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker, N. & Lombardi, K. (1997). Subject Relations: Unconscious Experience and Relational Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruszczynski, S. (1993). Psychotherapy with Couples London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (1997). Resistance, enactment, and interpretation: a self-analytic study. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 17: 13–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (2000). Countertransference, conflictual listening, and the analytic object relationship. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 49: 781–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (2001). Hearing voices: the fate of the analyst’s identifications. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 49: 781–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spezzano, C. (1995). “Classical” vs. “contemporary” theory: the differences that matter clinically. Contemp. Psychoanal., 31(1): 20–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spezzano, C. (1996). The three faces of two-person psychology: development, ontology, and epistemology. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 6: 599–622.
   Google Scholar
• Spezzano, C. (1998). The triangle of clinical judgment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 46: 365–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1989). The analyst’s unformulated experience of the patient. Contemp. Psychoanal., 25: 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1997). Unformulated Experience. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. & Atwood, G. (1992). Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R., Atwood, G. & Brandchaft, B. (1994). The Intersubjective Perspective. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, ed. M. Cole, S. Scribner, V. Johm-Steiner & E. Sounderman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Pres.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. (1953). Playing and Reality. New York: Routledge, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. (1960). The theory of the parent—infant relationship. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1974, pp. 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Zeddies, T. (2000). Within, outside, and in-between: the relational unconscious. Psychoanal. Psychol., 17(3): 467–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar