Saying the Right Thing at the Right Time: a View through the Lens of the Analytic Process Scales (Aps)

REFERENCES

• Ablon, S. & Jones, E. E. (1998). How expert clinicians’ prototypes of an ideal treatment correlate with outcome in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Psychother. Research, 8: 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkovec, T. D. & Miranda, J. (1996). Between group psychotherapy outcome research and basic science. Psychother. & Rehab. Research Bull., 5: 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. (1997). Patterns of discourse in “good” and troubled hours: a multiple code interpretation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 45: 155–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. (2000). The need for a “psychoanalytic psychology” in the cognitive science field. Psychoanal. Psychol., 17: 203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caston, J. (1993). Can analysts agree? The problems of consensus and the psychoanalytic mannequin: I. A proposed solution. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41: 493–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caston, J., Goldman, R. K. & McClure, M. M. (1986). The immediate effects of psychoanalytic interventions. In The Psychoanalytic Process: Theory, Clinical Observation, and Empirical Research, ed. J. Weiss, H. Sampson & Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group. New York: Guilford, pp. 277–298, pp. 377–379, pp. 387–391.
   Google Scholar
• Caston, J. & Martin, E. (1993). Can analysts agree? The problems of consensus and the psychoanalytic mannequin: II. Empirical tests. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41: 513–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. & Bond, M. (unpublished). The psychodynamic intervention rating scale.
   Google Scholar
• Crouse, J., Burton, A., Firestein, S., Scharf, R. & Waldron, S. (2003). A path analytic strategy to analyze psychoanalytic treatment effects. Int. J. Psychoanal., 1263–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, H. (1988). Frames of mind. In Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies, ed. H. Dahl, H. Kächele & H. Thomä. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, H. (1991). From the key to understanding change: emotions as appetitive wishes and beliefs about their fulfillment. In Emotion, Psychotherapy and Change, ed. J. Safran & L. Greenberg. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Garduk, E. L. & Haggard, E. A. (1972). Immediate effects on patients of psychoanalytic interpretations. Psychol. Issues, 7(monograph 28): 1–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gedo, P. M. & Schaffer, N. (1989). An empirical approach to studying psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Psychol., 6: 277–291.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, L. L., Katz, H. M., Schnitzer, R. D., Knapp, P. H., Frank, A. F. & Gunderson, J. G. (1989). Psychotherapy of schizophrenia: an empirical investigation of the relationship of process to outcome. Amer. J. Psychiat., 146: 603–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts, ed. P. Cole & J. L. Moran. New York. Academic Press, pp. 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E. & Pulos, S. M. (1993). Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapies. J. Consult. & Clin. Psychol., 61(2): 306–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E. & Windholz, M. (1990). The psychoanalytic case study: toward a method for systematic inquiry. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38: 985–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg, H., Kernberg, O., Appelbaum, A. H. & Smith, T. (1993). A method for analyzing therapist interventions in the psychotherapy of borderline patients. J. Psychother. Practice & Research, 2: 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg, H., Kernberg, O., Rockland, L., Appelbaum, A., Carr, A. & Kernberg, P. (1988). Developing an instrument for characterizing psychotherapy techniques in studies of the psychotherapy of borderline patients. In Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies, ed. H. Dahl, H. Kächele & H. Thomä. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L., Bachrach, H., Graff, H., Pulver, S. & Crits-Christoph, P. (1989). Preconditions and consequences of transference interpretations. J. Nervous & Mental Disease, 167: 391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L. & Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). Understanding Transference: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method. Washington, DC: Amer. Psychol. Assn.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., Mintz, J. & Auerbach, A. (1988). Who Will Benefit from Psychotherapy? Predicting Therapeutic Outcomes. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Main, M. (1996). Introduction to the special section on attachment and psychopathology: 2. Overview of the field of attachment. J. Consult. & Clin. Psychol., 64: 237–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malan, D. H. (1976). The Frontier of Brief Psychotherapy: An Example of the Convergence of Research and Clinical Practice. New York/London: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Milbrath, C., Bond, M., Cooper, S., Znoj, H. J., Horowitz, M. J. & Perry, J. C. (1999). Sequential consequences of therapists’ interventions. J. Psychother. Practice & Research, 8: 40–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nahum, J. P., Boston Change Process Study Group (CPSG), Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Sander, L. W., Stern, D. N. & Tronick, E. Z. (2002). Explicating the implicit: the local level and the microprocess of change in the analytic situation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 83: 1051–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norville, R., Sampson, H. & Weiss, J. (1996). Accurate interpretations and brief psychotherapy outcome. Psychother. Research, 6: 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, S. S., Suh, C. S. & Strupp, H. H. (1983). The Vanderbilt psychotherapy process scale: a report on the scale development and a process-outcome study. J. Consult. & Clin. Psychol., 51: 581–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palombo, S. R. (1999). The Emergent Ego: Complexity and Co-Evolution in the Psychoanalytic Process. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubovits-Seitz, P. (1992). Interpretive methodology: some problems, limitations, and remedial strategies. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40: 139–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubovits-Seitz, P. (1998). Depth-Psychological Understanding: The Methodologic Grounding of Clinical Interpretations. Hillsdale, NJ/London: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, R. L., ed. (1994). Reassessing Psychotherapy Research. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Scharf, R. D., Waldron, S., Firestein, S. K., Goldberger, M. & Burton, A. (unpublished). The analytic process scales (APS) coding manual.
   Google Scholar
• Seitz, P. (1966). The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. In Methods of Research in Psychotherapy, ed. L. Gottschalk & A. H. Auerbach. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: the consumer reports study. Amer. Psychologist, 50: 965–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E. & Fliess, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull., 86: 420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Bruschweiler-Stern, N. & Tronick, E. Z. (1998). Non-interpretative mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: the “something more” than interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 79: 903–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, C., Milbrath, C., Reidbord, S. & Bucci, W. (1994). Thematic segmentation of psychotherapy transcripts for convergent analyses. Psychother., 31: 36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, S., Spitzer, R., Davies, M. & Roose, S. (1997). The definition and assessment of analytic process: can analysts agree? Int. J. Psychoanal., 78: 959–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, S. (1998). Description of the psychoanalytic research consortium. http:www.psychoanalyticresearch.org.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, S., Scharf, R. D., Hurst, D., Firestein, S. K. & Burton, A. (2004). What happens in a psychoanalysis? A view through the lens of the analytic process scales (APS). Int. J. Psychoanal., 85: 443–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Wampold, B. E. (1997). Methodological problems in identifying efficacious psychotherapies. Psychother. Research, 7: 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, J., Sampson, H. & Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group, eds. (1986). The Psychoanalytic Process: Theory, Clinical Observation, and Empirical Research. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar