Thinking about Psychoanalytic Curricula: an Epistemological Perspective

REFERENCES

• Arlow, J. (1959). Psychoanalysis as scientific method. In Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method and Philosophy, ed. S. Hook. New York: New York Univ. Press, pp. 201–211.
   Google Scholar
• Arlow, J. (1969). Unconscious fantasy and disturbances of conscious experience. Psychoanal. Q., 38: 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlow, J. (1991). Methodology and reconstruction. Psychoanal. Q., 60: 539–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., Lachmann, F. & Jaffe, J. (1997). Mother—infant interaction structures and presymbolic self and object representations. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 7: 133–182.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, H. (1995). On the clinical value of daydreams and a note on their role in character analysis. In On Freud’s “Creative Writers and Day-Dreaming,” ed. E. S. Person, S. Figueira & P. Fonagy. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, pp. 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, H. (2003). Psychoanalytic controversies, repression, transference and reconstruction. Int. J. Psychoanal., 84: 497–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (2002). Why don’t our institutes teach the methodology of clinical psychoanalytic evidence? Psychoanal. Q., 71: 445–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohler, B. (1996). Panel Report—psychic reality and the analyst: the inner working of the analyst’s mind. Int. J. Psychoanal., 77: 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. M. (2003). Commentary. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 51(suppl.): 108–114.
   Google Scholar
• Creath, R. & Maienschein, J. (2000). Biology and Epistemology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, H. (1974). The measurement of meaning in psychoanalysis by computer analysis of verbal contexts. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 22: 37–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, H., Kächele, H. & Thomä, H. (1988). Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error. New York: Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Eagle, M. (1980). A critical examination of motivational explanation in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. & Contemp. Thought, 3: 329–380.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of Mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, M. (1984). Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, M. (1988). Psychoanalysis: A Theory in Crisis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feynman, R. (1994). ”Alright so maybe Haydn didn’t write them. So what? New York Times, May 15, p. 33.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Jones, E. E., Kächele, H., Krause, R., Clarkin, J., Perron, R., Gerber, A. & Allison, E. (2001). An Open Door Review of Outcome Studies in Psychoanalysis. London: Int. Psychoanal. Assn.
   Google Scholar
• Fosshage, J. L. (1983). Psychological function of dreams: a revised psychoanalytic perspective. Psychoanal. Study Child, 6: 641–669.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. S. E., 19.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1925). Some additional notes on dream interpretation as a whole. S. E., 19.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (1999). Why is reality a troubling concept? J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 47: 401–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (2000). Modern hermeneutics and psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Q., 69: 225–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V. & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the stimulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sci., 12: 493–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (1989). Dimensions of Self Experience. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grunbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of Calif. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanly, C. (1990). The concept of truth in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 71: 375–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, R. D. (1997). The elusive concept of “internal objects” (1934–1943) and its role in the formation of the Klein group. Int. J. Psychoanal., 78: 877–897.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holt, R. R. (1989). Freud Reappraised: A Fresh Look at Psychoanalytic Theory. New York/London: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R. R. (2002). Quantitative research on primary process: methods and findings. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50: 457–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, S. (1952). The nature and function of fantasy. In Developments in Psychoanalysis, ed. J. Riviere. London: Hogarth, pp. 67–121.
   Google Scholar
• Kafka, F. (1971). Investigations of a dog. In Kafka: The Complete Stories, ed. N. N. Glatzer. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 278–316.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. (1999). Biology and the future of psychoanalysis. Amer. J. Psychiat., 156: 505–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1971). Analysis of the Self. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1977). Restoration of the Self. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J. & Pontalis, J.-B. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Le Doux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lewontin, R. C. (2000). What do population geneticists know and how do they know it? In Biology and Epistemology, ed. R. Creath & J. Maienschein. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L. (2001). The meaning of empirically supported treatment research for psychoanalytic and other long-term therapies. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 11: 583–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, H. (1991). Perversion in fantasy and furtive enactments. In Perversions and Near Perversions in Clinical Practice, ed. G. Fogel & W. Myers. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, pp. 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, R. (1999). Psychoanalysts’ theories. In Psychoanalytic Theories in Practice: A Festschrift to Joseph Sandler, ed. P. Fonagy, A. M. Cooper & R. S. Wallerstein. New York: Routledge, pp. 187–200.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, L. S., Rieder, R. O., Glick, R. A., Luber, B. & Rosen, P. J. (2004). Testing psychotherapy skills among psychiatric residents: the psychodynamic psychotherapy competency test. Amer. J. Psychiat., 161: 1658–1664.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, E. (1959). Methodological issues in psychoanalytic theory. In Psychoanalysis: Scientific Method and Philosophy, ed. S. Hook. New York: New York Univ. Press, pp. 39–40.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, E. (1979). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Olds, D. D. (2000). A semiotic model of mind. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 48: 497–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olds, D. D. (2006a). Identification: psychoanalytic and biological perspectives. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 54: 7–46.
   Google Scholar
• Olds, D. D. (2006b). Interdisciplinary studies and our practice. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 54: 857–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pally, R. (1997). Memory: brain systems that link past, present and future. Int. J. Psychoanal., 78: 1223–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pally, R., in collaboration with D. D. Olds (2000). The Mind-Brain Relationship, ed. P. Williams. London: Karnac/New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1992). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pulver, S. E. (1987). The manifest dream in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35: 99–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser, M. (2001). The dream in contemporary psychiatry. Amer. J. Psychiat., 158: 351–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1977). The question of proof in Freud’s psychoanalytic writings. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 25: 835–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, B. (1997). Person, organism, and self: their worlds and their psychoanalytically relevant relationships. In Psychoanalysis and the Philosophy of Science, ed. R. R. Holt & M. N. Eagle. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 415–445.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int. J. Psychoanal., 64: 35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1996). Authority, evidence and knowledge in the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Q., 65: 236–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1997). Tradition and Change in Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, H. (1964). Fantasy and other mental processes. Int. J. Psychoanal., 45: 191–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood, M. (1969). The Logic of Explanation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shevrin, H., Bond, J. A., Brakel, L. A. W., Hertel, R. K. & Williams, W. J. (1996). Conscious and Unconscious Processes. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Solms, M. & Turnbull, O. (2002). The Brain and the Inner World. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1995). The nature and formation of the infant’s representations. In The Motherhood Constellation. New York: Basic Books, pp. 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Strenger, C. (1991). Between Hermeneutics and Science. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waelder, R. (1962). Psychoanalysis, scientific method and philosophy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 10: 617–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, S. (1997). How can we study the efficacy of psychoanalysis? Psychoanal Q., 66: 283–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (1986). Psychoanalysis as a science: a response to new challenges. Psychoanal. Q., 55: 414–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (2001). The generations of psychotherapy research: an overview. Psychoanal. Psychol., 18: 243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster’s New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition (1999). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Westen, D. & Gabbard, G. (2002a). Developments in cognitive neuroscience, I: conflict, compromise and connectionism. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50: 53–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen, D. & Gabbard, G. (2002b). Developments in cognitive neuroscience, II: implications for theories of transference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50: 99–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovell, Y. (2000). From hysteria to posttraumatic stress disorder: psychoanalysis and the neurobiology of traumatic memories. Neuro-psychoanal., 2/2: 171–182.
   Google Scholar