21
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Privacy, Reverie, and The Analyst’s Ethical Imagination

Pages 1045-1073 | Published online: 12 Sep 2017

REFERENCES

  • Aron, L. (1991). The patient’s experience of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1: 29–51.
  • Balint, M. (1968). The Basic Fault. London: Tavistock.
  • Bass, A. (1996). Holding, holding back, and holding on. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 6: 361–378.
  • Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: an intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychonal. Q., 73: 5–46.
  • Bion, W. (1959). Attacks on linking. Int. J. Psychonal., 40: 308–315.
  • Bion, W. (1962). Learning from Experience. London: Heinemann Medical Maresfield Library, 1984.
  • Bion, W. (1963). Elements of Psychoanalysis. London: Heinemann.
  • Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q., 64: 282–305.
  • Bollas, C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
  • Britton, R. (2003). Belief and Imagination. London: Routledge.
  • Britton, R. & Steiner, J. (1994). Interpretation: selected fact or overvalued idea. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75: 1069–1078.
  • Busch, F. (1993). “In the neighborhood“: aspects of a good interpretation and a “developmental lag” in ego psychology. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41: 151–177.
  • Cooper, S. H. (1997). The future of interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 78: 667–681.
  • Cooper, S. H. (1998a). Countertransference disclosure and the conceptualization of technique. Psychoanal. Q., 67: 128–154.
  • Cooper, S. H. (1998b). Analyst-subjectivity, analyst disclosure, and the aims of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Q., 67: 379–406.
  • Cooper, S. H. (2000). Objects of Hope: Exploring Possibility and Limit in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
  • Cooper, S. H. (2007). Begin the beguine: psychoanalysis and the pluralistic third. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 17(2): 247–272.
  • Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psycho-analysis. S. E., 12.
  • Gill, M. (1983). The interpersonal paradigm and the degree of the therapist’s involvement. Contemp. Psychoanal., 19: 200–237.
  • Gray, P. (1973). Psychoanalytic technique: the ego’s capacity to view intrapsychic activity. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21: 474–492.
  • Gray, P. (1990). The nature of therapeutic action in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38: 1083–1099.
  • Hoffman, I. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemp. Psychoanal., 19: 89–422.
  • Kris, A. (1990). Helping patients by analyzing self-criticism. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38: 605–636.
  • Loewald, H. (1960). The therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 41: 16–33.
  • Ogden, T. H. (1994a). The concept of interpretive action. Psychoanal. Q., 63: 219–245.
  • Ogden, T. H. (1994b). The analytic third: working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75: 3–20.
  • Ogden, T. H. (1996). Reconsidering three aspects of psychoanalytic technique: Int. J. Psychoanal., 77: 883–899.
  • Ogden, T. H. (1997). Reverie and interpretation: Henry James. Psychoanal. Q., 66: 567–595.
  • Ogden, T. H. (2004). The analytic third: implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Psychoanal. Q., 73: 167–196.
  • Pine, F. (2006). The psychoanalytic dictionary. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 54: 463–492.
  • Schwaber, E. (1992). The analyst’s retreat from the patient’s vantage point. Int. J. Psychoanal., 73: 349–361.
  • Slochower, J. (1996). The holding environment and the fate of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 13: 451–470.
  • Smith, H. F. (2000). Countertransference, conflictual listening, and the analytic object relationship. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 49: 781–812.
  • Smith, H. F. (2003). Can we integrate the diverse theories and practices of psychoanalysis? J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 51(suppl.): 145–161.
  • Steiner, J. (1993). Psychic Retreats. London: Routledge.
  • Stern, D. (1983). Unformulated experience. Contemp. Psychoanal., 19: 71–99.
  • Symington, N. (1983). The analyst’s act of freedom as an agent of therapeutic change. Int. Rev. Psychonanal., 10: 283–292.
  • Winnicott, D. (1958). The capacity to be alone. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.