A Different Universe: Reading Loewald through “On the Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis”

REFERENCES

• Balsam, R. H. (1997). Active neutrality and Loewald’s metaphor of theatre. Psychoanal. Study Child, 52: 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Balsam, R. H. (2008). The essence of Hans Loewald. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 56: 1117–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, A. (2000). Difference and Disavowal: The Trauma of Eros. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, A. (2003). Desymbolization in the third area. In Essays in Honor of Norbert Freedman, ed. R. Lasky New York: Other Press, pp. 142–163.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1995). Like Subjects, Love Objects. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1998). The Shadow of the Other: Intersubjectivity and Gender in Psychoanalysis. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from Experience. Northvale, NJ: Aronson, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q., 59: 550–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (2008). Psychoanalytic Disagreements in Context. New York: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. J. (1989). Introduction. In Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. J. (1999). The Power of Feelings: Personal Meaning in Psychoanalysis, Gender, and Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. J. (2003a). From behind the couch: uncertainty and indeterminacy in psychoanalytic theory and practice. Common Knowledge, 9: 463–487.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. J. (2003b). The psychoanalytic vision of Hans Loewald. Int. J. Psychoanal., 84: 897–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. J. (2004a). The American independent tradition: Loewald, Erikson, and the (possible) rise of intersubjective ego psychology. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 14: 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. J. (2004b). The question of a weltanschauung: ethnographic observations 70 years later. Paper presented as the Liebert Memorial Lecture, Columbia University Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research and Association for Psychoanalytic Medicine. New York, October 5.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. J. (2007). Reflections on Loewald’s “Internalization, Separation, Mourning, and the Superego.” Psychoanal. Q., 76: 1135–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. J. (2008). Introduction: the Loewaldian legacy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 56: 1089–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. B. (1952). Counter-transference and anxiety. Psychiatry, 15: 501–539.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. M. (1988). Our changing views of the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis: comparing Strachey and Loewald. Psychoanal. Q., 57: 15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society. New York/London: Norton, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, G. I., ed. (1991). The Work of Hans Loewald. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, G. I., Tyson, P., Greenberg, J., McLaughlin, J. T. & Peyser, E. R. (1996). A classic revisited: Loewald on the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44: 863–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. S. E., 4/5.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (1991). On the therapeutic action of Loewald’s theory. In The Work of Hans Loewald, ed. J. Fogel Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (1996). The Loewald phenomenon. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44: 671–672.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (2008). Loewald. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 56: 1105–1116.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann, P. (1950). On counter-transference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 31: 81–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustvedt, S. (2008). The Sorrows of an American. New York: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. (1991). The Use of the Self: Countertransference and Communication in the Analytic Situation. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. (1997). In search of the mind of the analyst: a progress report. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 45: 1035–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. (2002). Once more with feeling: on working through in the analyst and its role in the analytic process. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 22: 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. (2008). Hans Loewald: an appreciation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 56: 1097–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaywin, R. (1993). The theoretical contributions of Hans W. Loewald. Psychoanal. Study Child, 48: 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, F. (2007). Hans Loewald and the transformation of passion. Newsletter Psychoanal. Soc. New England East, 20(1): 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, J. (1990). Love and Its Place in Nature. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, J. (1996). The introduction of Eros: reflections on the work of Hans Loewald. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44: 673–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lear, J. (2003). Therapeutic Action: An Earnest Plea for Irony. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, S. A. (1989). Time and world in the thought of Hans W. Loewald. Psychoanal. Study Child, 44: 231–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Little, M. I. (1951). Counter-transference and the patient’s response to it. Int. J. Psychoanal., 32: 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1951). Ego and reality. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1952). The problem of defense and the neurotic interpretation of reality. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 221–256.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1962). Internalization, separation, mourning, and the superego. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 257–276.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1966). Review of Arlow and Brenner, Psychoanalytic Concepts and the Structural Theory. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1970). Psychoanalytic theory and the psychoanalytic process. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 277–301.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1971). On motivation and instinct theory. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 102–137.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1972). Freud’s conception of the negative therapeutic reaction, with comments on instinct theory. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 315–325.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1973). On internalization. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1975). Psychoanalysis as an art and the fantasy character of the psychoanalytic situation. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 352–371.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1976). Perspectives on memory. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 148–173.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1978a). Instinct theory, object relations, and psychic structure formation. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 207–218.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1978b). Primary process, secondary process, and language. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 178–206.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1979). The waning of the Oedipus complex. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 384–404.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1980). Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1984). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1986). Transference-countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34: 275–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, B. (2008). Discussion of Chodorow’s “A Different Universe: Reading Loewald through ‘On the Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis.’” Paper presented at Western New England Psychoanalytic Society, New Haven, CT. May 10.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. T. (2005a). The Healer’s Bent: Solitude and Dialogue in the Clinical Encounter. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. T. (2005b). Through the glass darkly. In The Healer’s Bent: Solitude and Dialogue in the Clinical Encounter. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 201–222.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. (2008). Loewald’s “binocular vision” and the art of analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 56: 1139–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1998). From ghosts to ancestors: the psychoanalytic vision of Hans Loewald. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 8: 825–855.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. 2000. Relationality: From Attachment to Intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nields, J. A. (2003). From unity to atonement: Some religious correlates of Hans Loewald’s developmental theory. Int. J. Psychoanal., 84: 699–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeyesekere, G. (1990). The Work of Culture: Symbolic Transformation in Psychoanalysis and Anthropology. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (2006). Reading Loewald: Oedipus reconceived. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87: 651–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsky, E. (2008). Loewald panel: discussion. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 56: 1129–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland, W. S. (1996). Melting the Darkness: The Dyad and Principles of Clinical Practice. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Poland, W. S. (1999). The analyst’s witnessing and otherness. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 48: 17–48.
   Google Scholar
• Racker, H. (1953). Contribution to the problem of countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 34: 313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1991). Internalizing Loewald. In The Work of Hans Loewald, ed. J. Fogel Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. B. (2007). A letter to Hans Loewald. Psychoanal. Q., 76: 1171–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (2001). Obstacles to integration: another look at why we talk past each other. Psychoanal. Psychol., 18: 485–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (2007). Voices that changed psychoanalysis in unpredictable ways. Psychoanal. Q., 76: 1049–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. & Atwood, G. E. (2002). Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G. (2001). Kohut, Loewald, and the Postmoderns: A Comparative Study of Self and Relationship. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treurniet, N. (1993). What is psychoanalysis now? Int. J. Psychoanal., 74: 873–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. S. (1996). Psychoanalytic process and interactive phenomena. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44: 699–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitebook, J. (2004). Hans Loewald: a radical conservative. Int. J. Psychoanal., 85: 97–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitebook, J. (2008). Hans Loewald, psychoanalysis, and the project of autonomy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 56: 1161–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1949). Hate in the countertransference. In Collected Papers: Through Paediatrics to Psycho-Analysis. London: Tavistock, 1958, pp. 194–203.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1951). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena—a study of the first not-me possession. Int. J. Psychoanal., 34: 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar