The Analyst’s Way of Being: Recognizing Separable Subjectivities and The Pendulum’s Swing

REFERENCES

• Aron, L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1995). Like Subjects, Love Objects. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: an intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanal. Q., 1: 5–46.
   Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q., 59: 550–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohleber, W., Fonagy, P., Jiménez, J. P., Scarfone, D., Varvin, S. & Zysman, S. (2013). Towards a better use of psychoanalytic concepts: a model illustrated using the concept of enactment. Int. J. Psychoanal., 94: 501–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, F. (2009). “Can you push a camel through the eye of a needle?” Reflections on how the unconscious speaks to us and its clinical implications. Int. J. Psychoanal., 90: 53–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassorla, R. (2012). What happens before and after acute enactments? An exercise in clinical validation and the broadening of hypothesis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 93: 53–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chessick, R. (1999). Contingency and the unformulated countertransference: a case presentation. J. Amer. Acad. Psychoanal., 27: 135–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chused, J. (1991). The evocative power of enactments. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39: 615–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, M. (2014). Analytic mind use and interpsychic communication: driving force in analytic technique, pathway to unconscious mental life. Psychoanal. Q., 83: 525–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellman, S. (2010). When Theories Touch: A Historical and Theoretical Integration of Psychoanalytic Thought. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Etchegoyen, R. (1991). Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Fabozzi, P. (2012). A silent yet radical future revolution: Winnicott’s innovative perspective. Psychoanal. Q., 81: 601–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faimberg, H. (1992). The countertransference position and the countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 73: 541–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psycho-analysis. S. E., 12.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, G. (1995). Countertransference: the emerging common ground. Int. J. Psychoanal., 76: 475–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann, P. (1950). On countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 31: 81–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (1998). The concept of enactment and theoretical convergence. Psychoanal. Q., 67: 78–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. (1986). On countertransference enactments. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34: 289–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. (1993). The inner experiences of the analyst: their contribution to the analytic process. Int. J. Psychoanal., 74: 7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, B. (1985). Transference: the total situation Int. J. Psychoanal., 66: 447–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1993). Convergences and divergences in contemporary psychoanalytic technique. Int. J. Psychoanal., 74: 659–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, J. D., Lachmann, F. M. & Fosshage, J. L. (1992). Self and Motivational Systems: Toward a Theory of Psychoanalytic Technique. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, J. D., Lachmann, F. M. & Fosshage, J. L. (1996). The Clinical Exchange: Techniques Derived from Self and Motivational Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39: 595–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermelstein, J. (2000). The role of concordance and complementarity in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanal. Psychol., 17: 706–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1997). Reverie and interpretation: Henry James (1884). Psychoanal. Q., 66: 567–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine, F. (2011). Beyond pluralism: psychoanalysis and the workings of the mind. Psychoanal. Q., 80: 823–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland, W. (1992). Transference: “an original creation.” Psychoanal. Q., 61: 185–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racker, H. (1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference. Psychoanal. Q., 26: 303–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 62: 553–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1996). The analyst’s self-discovery. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 16: 390–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1976a). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 3: 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1976b). Actualization and object relationships. J. Philadelphia Assn. Psychoanal., 3: 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1993). On communication from patient to analyst: not everything is projective identification. Int. J. Psychoanal., 74: 1097–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanicke, A. & Killingmo, B. (2013). Object trust: a specific kind of analytic change. Psychoanal. Psychol., 30: 423–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. (2000). Containment, enactment, and communication. Int. J. Psychoanal., 81: 245–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D., Brandchaft, B. & Atwood, G. E. (1987). Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tower, L. (1956). Countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 4: 224–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vida, J. (2001). The indispensable “difficult event.” In Failures in Psychoanalytic Treatment, ed. J. Reppen & M. Schulman. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Westen, D. & Gabbard, G. O. (2002). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: II. Implications for theories of transference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50: 99–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, C. & Malone, T. (1953). The Roots of Psychotherapy. Philadelphia, PA: Blakiston.
   Google Scholar