Development of Instruments to Assess Teacher and Student Perceptions of Inquiry Experiences in Science Classrooms

References

• Science for all Americans1989New YorkOxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Benchmarks for science literacy1993Washington, D.C.Author
   Google Scholar
• CampbellTBohnCScience laboratory experiences of high school students across one state in the U.S.: Descriptive research from the classroomScience Educator20081713648
   Google Scholar
• CavalloALaubachTStudents’ science perceptions and enrollment decisions in differing learning cycle classroomsJournal of Research in Science Teaching2001381029106210.1002/tea.1046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChangCMaoSComparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instructionThe Journal of Educational Research19999234034610.1080/00220679909597617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErtepinarHGebanOEffect of instruction supplied with the investigative-oriented laboratory approach on achievement in a science courseEducational Research199638333341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FaircloughNCritical discourse analysis: The critical study of language1995Harlow, EnglandLongman Group
   Google Scholar
• GorsuchRLFactor analysis19832Hillsdale, NJErlbaum
   Google Scholar
• GorsuchRLWeinerIBFreedheimDKSchinkaJAFactor analysisHandbook of psychology2003Hoboken, NJJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc143164
   Google Scholar
• HakkarainenKProgressive inquiry in a computer-supported biology classJournal of Research in Science Teaching2003401072108810.1002/tea.10121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnstonADemythologizing or dehumanizing? A response to Settlage and the ideals of open inquiryJournal of Science Teacher Education200819111310.1007/s10972-007-9079-y
   Google Scholar
• LawsonABenfordRBloomICarlsonMFalconerKHestenesDJudsonEPiburnMet al.Evaluating college science and mathematics instruction: A reform effort that improves teaching skillsJournal of College Science Teaching200231388393
   Google Scholar
• LeongFAustinJThe psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants20062Thousand Oaks, CASagePUBLICations
   Google Scholar
• MaclsaacDFalconerKReforming physics instruction via RTOPThe Physics Teacher20024047948510.1119/1.1526620
   Google Scholar
• MadausGFEarlyMJRehageKJThe influence of testing on the curriculumIssues in curriculum: A selection of chapters from past NSSE yearbooks1999ChicagoThe University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• MarekEALaubachTAPedersenJPreservice elementary school teachers’ understanding of theory-based science educationJournal of Science Teacher Education20031414715910.1023/A:1025918216347
   Google Scholar
• MarekEAMaierSJMcCannFAssessing understanding of the learning cycle: The ULCJournal of Science Teacher Education20081937538910.1007/s10972-008-9100-0
   Google Scholar
• MathisonSWhy triangulate?Educational Researcher1988171317
   Google Scholar
• National science education standards1996Washington, DCNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science2005Washington, DCNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2007). NSTA position statement. The Integral Role of Laboratory Investigations in Science Instruction. Retrieved on October 23, 2009, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/laboratory.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• NunnallyJCBernsteinIHPsychometric theory19943New YorkMcGraw-Hill
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, C. Y., & Weiss, A. R. (1999). Student work and teacher practices in science. United States Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 1999-455).
   Google Scholar
• ParisSYamborKPackardBHands-on biology: A museum-school-university partnership for enhancing students’ interest and learning in scienceThe Elementary School Journal19989826728910.1086/461894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I., & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP): Reference manual (ACEPT Technical Report No. INOO-3). Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers (Eric Document Reproduction Service, ED 447 205).
   Google Scholar
• SawadaDPiburnMJudsonETurleyJFalconerKBenfordRBloomIMeasuring reform practices in science and mathematicsSchool Science and Mathematics200210224525310.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17883.x
   Google Scholar
• SchwartzRLedermanNCrawfordBDeveloping views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiryScience Education20048861064510.1002/sce.10128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SettlageJDemythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false ideal of open inquiryJournal of Science Teacher Education20071846146710.1007/s10972-007-9060-9
   Google Scholar
• SmithKDevelopment of the primary teacher questionnaireJournal of Educational Research19938712329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmolleckLYoderEFurther development and validation of the teaching science as inquiry (TSI) instrumentSchool Science & Mathematics200810829129710.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17842.x
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS). (2007). Chicago: SPSS Inc. (Rel. 16.0.1. 2007).
   Google Scholar
• TaylorPCFraserBFisherDMonitoring constructivist classroom learning environmentsInternational Journal of Educational Research19972729330210.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., & Maor, D. (2000). Assessing the efficacy of online teaching with the constructivist online learning environment survey. In A. Herrmann & M. M. Kulski (Eds.), Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved on October 23, 2009, from http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/taylor.html.
   Google Scholar
• WindschitlMInquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?Science Education20038711214310.1002/sce.10044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar