Argument as Professional Development: Impacting Teacher Knowledge and Beliefs About Science

References

• Anderson, S. W., & Libarkin, J. C. (2006). The Geoscience Concept Inventory. Retrieved April, 27, 2007, from http://newton.bhsu.edu/eps/gci.html.
   Google Scholar
• AndriessenJSawyerKArguing to learnHandbook of the learning sciences2006CambridgeCambridge University press443459
   Google Scholar
• AvraamidouLZembal-SaulCGiving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first-year elementary teacher’s specialized practices and knowledgeJournal of Research in Science Teaching200542996599810.1002/tea.20081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BellPLinnMCScientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIEInternational Journal of Science Education200022879781710.1080/095006900412284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BerlandL. K.McNeillK. L.A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contextsScience Education2010945765793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrickerLABellPArgumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science educationScience Education200892347349810.1002/sce.20278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CavagnettoARArgument to foster scientific literacyReview of Educational Research201080333637110.3102/0034654310376953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChinnCAO’DonnellAMHmelo-SilverCEErkensGLearning to argueCollaborative learning, reasoning, and technology2006Mahawah, NJErlbaum
   Google Scholar
• ChoiANotebaertADiazJHandBExamining arguments generated by year 5, 7, and 10 students in science classroomsResearch in Science Education201040214916910.1007/s11165-008-9105-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• CrippenK. J.BiesengerK. D.EbertE. E.Using professional development to achieve classroom reform and science proficiency: An urban success story from Southern Nevada USAProfessional Development in Education2010364637661
   Google Scholar
• CrossDTaasoobshiraziGHendricksSHickeyDTArgumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identitiesInternational Journal of Science Education200830683786110.1080/09500690701411567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DriverRNewtonPOsborneJEstablishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroomsScience Education20008428731210.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.-P. (Eds.). (2007). Argumentation in Science Education. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ErduranSSimonSOsborneJTAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argumentation pattern for studying science discourseScience Education200488691593310.1002/sce.20012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. L., & Hestenes, D. (2001, 2001). The concept of the concept inventory assessment instrument. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual, Reno, NV.
   Google Scholar
• ExamGen (2007). ExamGen: Test item databases for today’s teachers. Retrieved June, 14, 2007, from http://www.examgen.com/.
   Google Scholar
• GaretMSPorterACDismoneLBirmanBFYoonKSWhat makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachersAmerican Educational Research Journal200138491594510.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowin, B. D., & Alvarez, M. C. (2005). The art of educating with V diagrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., & Keys, C. W. (1999). Inquiry investigation: A new approach to laboratory reports. The Science Teacher(April), 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• KellerJEliciting and addressing student misconceptions regarding the atmospheric greenhouse effect and radiative equilibrium2006ArizonaUniversity of Arizona
   Google Scholar
• KuhnTSThe structure of the scientific revolution19963Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, L., & Reiser, B. (2006). Structuring activities to foster argumentative discourse. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• LibarkinJCAndersonSWAssessment of learning in entry-level geoscience courses: Results from the Geoscience Concept InventoryJournal of Geoscience Education2005534394401
   Google Scholar
• LincolnYGubaENaturalistic inquiry1985Thousand Oaks, CASagePUBLICations
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (2005). Internet environments for science education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-HorsleySMatsumotoCResearch on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the sceneSchool Science and Mathematics199999525827110.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17484.x
   Google Scholar
• LuftJAChanging inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachersInternational Journal of Science Education200123551753410.1080/09500690121307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeillKLLizotteDJKrajcikJMarxRWSupporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materialsJournal of the Learning Sciences200615215319110.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National science education standards1996Washington, DCNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning2000Washington, DCNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• OsborneJErduranSSimonSEnhancing the quality of argumentation in school scienceJournal of Research in Science Teaching20044110994102010.1002/tea.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, C. M. (2007). Argumentation in modeling classrooms. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Pew (2007). Climate Change 101: Understanding and Responding to Global Climate Change. Retrieved 12/5, 2010, from http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/climate_change_101.
   Google Scholar
• QuintanaCReiserBJDavisEAKrajcikJFretzEDuncanRGet al.A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiryJournal of the Learning Sciences200413333738610.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoehrigGHLuftJAConstraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessonsInternational Journal of Science Education200426132410.1080/0950069022000070261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RothW-MMcGinnMKInscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practiceReview of Educational Research19986813559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SadlerTDInformal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of researchJournal of Research in Science Teaching200441551353610.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SadlerTDPromoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher educationJournal of Science Teacher Education200617432334610.1007/s10972-006-9025-4
   Google Scholar
• SadlerTDChambersWFZeidlerDLStudent conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issueInternational Journal of Science Education200426438740910.1080/0950069032000119456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SadlerTDZeidlerDLPatterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision makingJournal of Research in Science Teaching200542111213810.1002/tea.20042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SadlerTDZeidlerDLThe significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issuesScience Education2005891719310.1002/sce.20023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SampsonVClarkDBAssessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directionsScience Education200892344747210.1002/sce.20276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SandovalWAUnderstanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiryScience Education200589463465610.1002/sce.20065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SandovalWAMillwoodKAThe quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanationsCognition and Instruction2005231235510.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchwarzBGlassnerAAndriessenJBakerMSuthersDThe blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issuesArguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments2003DordrechtKluwer227260
   Google Scholar
• SchwormSRenklALearning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examplesJournal of Educational Psychology200799228529610.1037/0022-0663.99.2.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimonSErduranSOsborneJLearning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroomInternational Journal of Science Education200628223526010.1080/09500690500336957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SingerJLotterCFellerRGatesHExploring a model of situated professional development: Impact on classroom practiceJournal of Science Teacher Education201122320322710.1007/s10972-011-9229-0
   Google Scholar
• TaylorJADanaTMSecondary school physics teachers’ conceptions of scientific evidence: An exploratory case studyJournal of Research in Science Teaching200340872173610.1002/tea.10108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TothEESuthersDDLesgoldAMMapping to know: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiryScience Education200286226428610.1002/sce.10004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ToulminSThe uses of argument1958Cambridge, MACambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• ToulminSRiekeRJanikAAn introduction to reasoning19842New York, NYMacmillan
   Google Scholar
• TytlerRDugganSGottRDimensions of evidence, thePUBLIC understanding of science and science educationInternational Journal of Science Education200123881583210.1080/09500690010016058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VenvilleGJDawsonVMThe impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of scienceJournal of Research in Science Teaching2010478952977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VossJFMeansMLLearning to reason via instruction in argumentationLearning and Instruction19911433735010.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X
   Google Scholar
• WallaceCSHandBYangE-MSaulEWThe science writing heuristic: Using writing as a tool for learning in the laboratoryCrossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice2004Newark, DEInternational Reading Association355368
   Google Scholar
• ZimmermanCThe development of scientific reasoning skillsDevelopmental Review20002019914910.1006/drev.1999.0497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar