Preservice Science Teachers’ Uses of Inscriptions in Science Teaching

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benchmarks for science literacy1993New YorkOxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• BastideFLynchMWoolgarSThe Iconography of Scientific Text: Principles of AnalysisRepresentation in scientific practice1990Cambridge, MAMIT Press187229
   Google Scholar
• BowenGMRothW-MData and graph interpretation practices among preservice science teachersJournal of Research in Science Teaching200542101063108810.1002/tea.20086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownJSCollinsAllanDuguidPSituated cognition and the culture of learningEducational Researcher19891813210.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• CarlsenMReasoning with paper and pencil: The role of inscriptions in student learning of geometric seriesMathematics Education Research Journal2009211548410.1007/BF03217538
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DuschlRAAbandoning the scientific legacy of science educationScience Education1988721516210.1002/sce.3730720105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FormanEAAnsellEOrchestrating the multiple voices and inscriptions of a mathematics classroomJournal of the Learning Sciences200211225127410.1207/S15327809JLS11,2-3n_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimura, J. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and "translation”. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 168–211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• GabelDImproving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the futureJournal of Chemical Education199976454810.1021/ed076p548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenoJGHallRPPracticing representation learning with and about representational formsPhi Delta Kappan1997785361367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16, 448–473.
   Google Scholar
• KellyGJChenCThe sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourseJournal of Research in Science Teaching199936888391510.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<883::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KozmaRThe material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understandingLearning and Instruction200313220522610.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning, 9(2), 105–143. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from http://www.informaworld.com/index/785041381.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• LarkinJ. H.SimonH. A.Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand wordsCognitive Science1987116599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LatourBScience in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society1987Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• LemkeJLTalking science: Language, learning and values1990Norwood, NJAblex Publishing Corporation
   Google Scholar
• LemkeJMartinJRVeelRMultiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific textReading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science1998New York, NYRoutledge87113
   Google Scholar
• LunsfordEMelearCTRothWMPerkinsMHickokLGCarolinaN Proliferation of inscriptions and transformations among preservice science teachers engaged in authentic scienceJournal of Research in Science Teaching200744453856410.1002/tea.20160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MerriamSQualitative research: A guide to design and implementation20092San Francisco, CAWiley
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• National science education standards1996Washington, DCNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• RothW-MMcGinnMKInscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practiceReview of Educational Research19986813510.3102/00346543068001035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RothWMMcGinnMBowenMHow prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practicesJournal of Science Teacher Education199891254810.1023/A:1009465505918
   Google Scholar
• RothWPozzer-ArdenghiLHanJYCritical graphicacy: Understanding visual representation practice in school science2005DordrechtSpringer
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande & kulturella redskap: Om lärprocesser och det kollektiva minnet [Learning & cultural tools. On processes of learning and the collective memory]. Falun: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• SchwabJ. J.What do scientists do?Behavior Science196051127
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 37–54). London: Pitman; San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1995). The politics of formal representations: Wizards, gurus, and organizational complexity. In S. L. Star (Ed.), Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology (pp.88–118). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1990). Time and documents in researcher interaction: Some ways of making out what is happening in experimental science. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 123–152). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• WuH-KKrajcikJSExploring middle school students’ use of inscriptions in project-based science classroomsScience Education200690585287310.1002/sce.20154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Fourth Dei.). Los Angles: SagePUBLICations, Inc.
   Google Scholar