Participation in a Multi-institutional Curriculum Development Project Changed Science Faculty Knowledge and Beliefs About Teaching Science

References

• Science for all Americans1989New YorkOxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Benchmarks for science literacy1993New YorkOxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Blueprints for reform1997New YorkOxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Atlas of science literacy2001New YorkOxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Designs for science literacy2001New YorkOxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Retrieved from http://www.visionandchange.org/
   Google Scholar
• ArgyrisCPutnamRMcLain SmithDAction science1985San FranciscoJossey-Bass
   Google Scholar
• Ballone-DuranLCzerniakCMHaneyJJA study of the effects of a LSC project on scientists’ teaching practices and beliefsJournal of Science Teacher Education20051615918410.1007/s10972-005-2650-5
   Google Scholar
• BaviskarSNHartleRTWhitneyTEssential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist-teaching method articlesInternational Journal of Science Education20093154155010.1080/09500690701731121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, P. J. (2002). Putting the pieces of teacher education together: Lessons learned by the Eisenhower initial teacher professional development programs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 1–5, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• BransfordJDBrownALPellegrinoJWHow people learn2000Washington, DCNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• CatonEBrewerCBrownFBuilding teacher–scientist partnerships: Teaching about energy through inquirySchool Science and Mathematics200110071510.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17315.x
   Google Scholar
• CatonELBrewerCAManningMTeaching with inquiry: Scientist/teacher partnerships for ecological and energy educationSupplement to Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America19977865
   Google Scholar
• Chaplin, S. B., & Manske, J. M. (2005). A theme-based approach to teaching nonmajors biology. Journal of College Science Teaching,35, 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• DancyMHendersonCFramework for articulating instructional practices and conceptionsPhysical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research20073010103-010101010103-010115
   Google Scholar
• DonovanDAAtkinsLJSalterIYGallagherDJKratzRFRousseauJVNelsonGDAdvantages and challenges of using physics curricula as a model for reforming an undergraduate biology courseCBE—Life Sciences Education201312215229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, D. A., Rousseau, J. V., Salter, I. Y., Atkins, L. J., Acevedo-Gutierrez, A., Kratz, R. F., … Pape-Lindstrom, P. (2014) Life science and everyday thinking. New York: It’s About Time.
   Google Scholar
• DriverRSquiresARushworthPWood-RobinsonVMaking sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas1994LondonRoutledge-Farmer
   Google Scholar
• DrugerMAllenGA study of the role of research scientists in K-12 science educationAmerican Biology Teacher19986034434910.2307/4450492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert-MayDDertlingTLHodderJMomsenJLLongTMJardelezaSEWhat we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of faculty professional development programsBioScience20116155055810.1525/bio.2011.61.7.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EntwistleNWalkerPStrategic alertness and expanded awareness within sophisticated conceptions of teachingInstructional Science20002833536110.1023/A:1026579005505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FedockPZamboRCobernWThe professional development of college science professors as science teacher educatorsScience Education19968051910.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199601)80:1<5::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarmstonBWellmanBThe adaptive school: A sourcebook for developing and collaborative groups1999Norwood, MAChristopher-Gordan
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, F., Robinson, S., & Otero, V. (2008). Physics and everyday thinking. Armonk, NY: Herff Jones Education Division.
   Google Scholar
• HakeRRInteractive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics coursesAmerican Journal of Physics199866647410.1119/1.18809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., … Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521–522.
   Google Scholar
• HandlerMGRavidRThe many faces of school–university collaboration: Characteristics of successful partnerships2001Englewood, COTeacher Ideas Press
   Google Scholar
• Horizon Research (2000). Inside the classroom observation and analytic protocol. Retrieved from http://www.horizon-research.com/instruments/clas/cop.php
   Google Scholar
• JonesMGCarterGAbellSKLedermanNGScience teacher attitudes and beliefsHandbook of research on science education2007Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum10671104
   Google Scholar
• KaneRSandrettoSHeathCTelling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academicsReview of Educational Research20027217722810.3102/00346543072002177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaser, J. S., Dougherty, M. J., & Bourexis, P. S. (2013). Unexpected outcomes: Impacting higher education teaching practice via high school outreach. Journal of College Science Teaching,43, 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• KemberDKwanK-PLecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teachingInstructional Science20002846949010.1023/A:1026569608656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley, G. & O’Neill, D. (2001). Performance measurement inPUBLIC–private partnerships: Learning from Praxis, constructing a conceptual model. Presentation given at the American Society forPUBLIC Administration 65th National Conference, Portland, OR, March 27–30, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• KrockoverGAdamsPEichingerDNakhlehMShepardsonDAction based research teams: Collaborating to improve science instructionJournal of College Science Teaching200130313317
   Google Scholar
• KrockoverGHShepardsonDPAdamsPEEichengerDNakhlehMReforming and assessing undergraduate science instruction using collaborative action-based research teamsSchool Science and Mathematics200210226628410.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17885.x
   Google Scholar
• LawsPWWorkshop physics activity guide1996San FranciscoWiley
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A., Benford, R., Bloom, I., Carlson, M., Falconer, K., Hestenes, D., … Wyckoff, S. (2002). Evaluating college science and mathematics instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31, 388–393.
   Google Scholar
• LiuCHMatthewsRVygotsky’s philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examinedInternational Education Journal20056386399
   Google Scholar
• LueraGROttoCADevelopment and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movementsJournal of Science Teacher Education20051624125810.1007/s10972-005-4585-2
   Google Scholar
• MaloneyPAPartnerships, policy, and educational change: The role of mathematics and science in K-16 reformFlorida Journal of Educational Administration and Policy20071110
   Google Scholar
• McAlpineLWestonCTimmermansJBerthiaumeDFairbank-RochGZones: Reconceptualizing teacher thinking in relation to actionStudies in Higher Education20063160161510.1080/03075070600923426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermottLCPhysics by inquiry1996San FranciscoWiley
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J., Levine, R., & Bitter, C. (2004). University and K-12 school partnerships: How does one make these happen? American Institutes for Research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April 16, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National science education standards1996Washington, DCNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• Science teacher preparation in an era of standards-based reform1997Washington, DCNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology1996Washington, DCNSF Division of Undergraduate Education
   Google Scholar
• OhanaCPartnerships in math education: The power of university–school collaboration2003Portsmouth, NHHeinemann
   Google Scholar
• Pedrosa-de-JesusMHLopesBDThe relationship between teaching and learning conceptions, preferred teaching approaches and questioning practicesResearch Papers in Education20112622324310.1080/02671522.2011.561980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PiagetJSuccess and understanding1978Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• RedishEFSaulJMSteinbergRNOn the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratoriesAmerican Journal of Physics19976555410.1119/1.18498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoehrigGHLuftJAInquiry teaching in high school chemistry classrooms: The role of knowledge and beliefsJournal of Chemical Education2004811510151610.1021/ed081p1510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosenbaumPRObservational studies1995New YorkSpringer
   Google Scholar
• SchulmanLSThose who understand: Knowledge growth in teachingEducational Researcher198615241410.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• StaverJRConstructivism: Sound theory for explicating the practice of science and science teachingJournal of Research in Science Teaching19983550152010.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199805)35:5<501::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StokstadEReintroducing the intro courseScience20012931608161010.1126/science.293.5535.1608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StraussALQualitative analysis for social scientists1987New YorkCambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• StraussALCorbinJBasics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques1990Newbury Park, CASage
   Google Scholar
• Sunal D. W., Hodges, J., Sunal, C. S., Whitaker, K. W., Freeman, L. M., Edwards, L., … Odell, M. (2001). Teaching science in higher education: Faculty professional development and barriers to change. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 246–257.
   Google Scholar
• SunalDWWrightELBland DayJReform in undergraduate science for the 21st century2004Greenwich, CTInformation Age
   Google Scholar
• TrigwellKProsserMChanging approaches to teaching: A relational perspectiveStudies in Higher Education19962127528410.1080/03075079612331381211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VygotskyLSMind in society: The development of higher psychological processes1978CambridgeHarvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• WeberRPBasic content analysis19902Newbury Park, CASage
   Google Scholar
• WeldJFunkL“I’m not the science teacher type”: Effect of an inquiry biology content course on preservice elementary teachers’ intentions about teaching scienceJournal of Science Teacher Education20051618920410.1007/s10972-005-4860-2
   Google Scholar
• WigginsGMcTigheJUnderstanding by design1998Alexandria, VAAssociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., McInerney, J., Frechtling, J., Michie, J., Wells, J., Miyaoka, A., & Nyre, G. (2009) Who benefits? The effects of STEM faculty engagement in MSP. Report prepared for the National Science Foundation by Westat. Rockville, MD. Retrieved from http://hub.mspnet.org/index.cfm/18052
   Google Scholar