Changing households and changing cities, 1970–1980Footnote

This article is adapted from a paper the author presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association in New York City in 1986. An earlier draft was improved by the comments of John D. Kasarda of the University of North Carolina and two anonymous referees. Helpful advice was also provided by Anthony J. La Greca and John C. Henretta when the study was undertaken as an M.A. thesis at the University of Florida.

References

• See, for examplePaul C.GlickA Demographer Looks at American FamiliesJournal of Marriage and the Family37February 19751526 Arthur J. Norton, Keeping Up With Households. American Demographics 5 (February 1983) 16–21. James A. Sweet, Components of Change in the Number of Households, 1970–1980. Demography 21 (May 1984) 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RichardReesConcepts of Urban Social Space: Towards an Urban Social GeographyB.J.L.BerryF.E.HortonGeographic Perspectives on Urban Systems1970Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs306396 R.J. Johnston, Urban Residential Patterns. (1971) G. Bell and Sons. London. 197–241. Avery M. Guest, Patterns of Family Location. Demography 9 (February 1972) 156–171.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, “Patterns of Family Location.”
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Urban Residential Patterns, pp. 101–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.; Guest, “Patterns of Family Location.”
   Google Scholar
• SeeRobert E.ParkThe City: Suggestions for the Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban EnvironmentAmerican Journal of Sociology20March 1916577580 Ernest W. Burgess, The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project. R.E.ParkE.W.BurgessR.D.Mackenzie The City (1925) University of Chicago Press. Chicago. 47–62. Amos Hawley, Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure. (1950) Roland Press. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Brian J.L.BerryJohn D.KasardaContemporary Urban Ecology1977MacmillanNew York5
   Google Scholar
• DavidReismanThe Suburban DislocationAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science314November 1957123146 Wendell Bell, Social Choice, Lifestyles, and Suburban Residence. W.Dobriner The New Urbanization (1958) St. Martin's Press. New York. 225–247. Arnold S. Feldman, Charles Tilly, The Interaction of Social and Physical Space. American Sociological Review 25 (December 1960) 877–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janet AbuLughodMary MixFoleyConsumer StrategiesN.M.FooteJ.AbuLughodM.M.FoleyL.WinnickHousing Choices and Housing Constraints1960McGraw-HillNew York71271
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Urban Residential Patterns, pp.45–46.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen M.GolantResidential Concentrations of Future ElderlyThe Gerontologist15February 19751625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, Urban Residential Patterns, pp. 45–46.
   Google Scholar
• SeeKarl E.TaeuberAlma F.TaeuberNegroes in Cities1965AldineChicago
   Google Scholar
• DennisRoneckRalphBellHarveyCholdinFemale-Headed Families: An Ecological Model of Residential Concentration in a Small CityJournal of Marriage and the Family42February 1980157169 Christine C. Cook, Nancy M. Rudd, Factors Influencing the Residential Location of Female Householders. Urban Affairs Quarterly 20 (September 1984) 78–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, “A Demographer Looks at American Families”;Frances E.KobrinThe Fall in Household Size and the Rise of the Primary Individual in the United StatesDemography13February 1976127138 Judith Treas, Postwar Trends in Family Size. Demography 18 (August 1981) 321–334. Sweet, Components of Change in the Number of Households (1970–1980)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the CensusStatistical Abstract of the United States, 1982–19831982U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, DC43
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the CensusStatistical Abstract of the United States, 1982–19831982U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, DC43
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the CensusDescription and Technical Documentation for the 1980 Census1983U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, DC9
   Google Scholar
• Mary JoBaneRobert S.WeissAlone Together: The World of Single Parent FamiliesAmerican Demographics2May 19801115
   Google Scholar
• Norton, “Keeping Up With Households.
   Google Scholar
• Albert N.CousinsKenneth N.EslingerAn Analysis of the One-person Household: A Challenge to the Atomistic Theory of UrbanizationPopulation Review27January–December 19832733
   Google Scholar
• GeorgeSternliebJames W.HughesThe Changing Demography of the Central CityScientific American243August 19834854
   Google Scholar
• GeorgeSternliebJames W.HughesThe Changing Demography of the Central CityScientific American243August 19834854
   Google Scholar
• LarryLongPaul C.GlickFamily Patterns in Suburban AreasB.SchwartzThe Changing Face of the Suburbs1976University of Chicago PressChicago3667 Clare M. Stapleton Concord, The Spatial Distribution of Primary Individuals. The Professional Geographer 34 (May 1982) 167–177. William H. Frey, Frances E. Kobrin, Changing Families and Changing Mobility: Their Impact on the Central City. Demography 19 (August 1982) 261–277. Kevin M. Fitzpatrick, John Logan, The Aging of the Suburbs, 1960–1980. American Sociological Review 50 (February 1985) 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• John D.KasardaThe Implications of Contemporary Resistribution Trends for National Urban PolicySocial Science Quarterly61December 1980373399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternlieb and Hughes, “The Changing Demography of the Central City”; Concord, “The Spatial Distribution of Primary Individuals”; Frey and Korbin, “Changing Families and Changing Mobility.”
   Google Scholar
• Roncek et al., “Female-Headed Families”; Cook and Rudd, “Factors Influencing the Residential Location of Female Householders,” pp. 78–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, Human Ecology, p. 280; Johnston, Urban Residential Patterns, pp. 97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Frey and Kobrin, “Changing Families and Changing Mobility.”
   Google Scholar
• Roncek et al., “Female-Headed Families.”
   Google Scholar
• Sternlieb and Hughes, “The Changing Demography of the Central City.”
   Google Scholar
• SeeU.S. Bureau of the CensusCensus and Population and Housing: 1970 Census Tracts, Cleveland, Ohio SMSA PHC (1)-451972U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, DC See U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census and Population and Housing: 1970 Census Tracts, Houston, Texas SMSA. PHC (1)-89 (1982) U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC. U.S. Government Printing Office, Census of Population and Housing: 1970 Metropolitan Housing Characteristics, Cleveland, Ohio SMSA. PHC (2)-46 (1972) U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC. U.S. Bureau of the (1972) U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing: 1980 Census Tracts, Cleveland, Ohio SMSA. HC80-2-123 (1983) U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing: 1980 Census Tracts, Houston, Texas SMSA. PHC80-2-184 (1983) U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census, Description and Technical Documentation for the 1980 Census, p. 9.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census, Description and Technical Documentation for the 1980 Census, p. 9.
   Google Scholar
• Katherine L.BradburyAnthonyDownsKenneth A.SmallUrban Decline and the Future of American Cities1982The Brookings InstitutionWashington, DC237
   Google Scholar
• Scott J.SouthDudley L.PostonThe U.S. Metropolitan SystemUrban Affairs Quarterly18December 1982187206
   Google Scholar
• Vivan Z.KlaffGlenn V.FuguittAnnexation as a Factor in the Growth of U.S. Cities, 1950–1960 and 1960–1970Demography15February 1978112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivan Z.KlaffGlenn V.FuguittAnnexation as a Factor in the Growth of U.S. Cities, 1950–1960 and 1960–1970Demography15February 1978112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, “The Growth of the City.”
   Google Scholar
• ChauncyHarrisEdwardUllmanThe Nature of CitiesAnnals of the American Association of Political and Social Science242November 1945717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles F.CorteseFrankFalkJack K.CohenFurther Considerations on the Methodological Analysis of Segregation IndicesAmerican Sociological Review41August 1976630637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the CensusStatistical Abstract of the United States1982–1983431
   Google Scholar
• Sternlieb and Hughes, “The Changing Demography of the Central City.”
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the CensusStatistical Abstract of the United States1982–1983445
   Google Scholar
• PatriciaGoberShrinking Household Size and Its Effect on Urban Population Density Patterns: A Case Study of Phoenix, ArizonaProfessional Geographer32February 19805562 Patricia Gober, Falling Household Size and Its Effects on Metropolitan Growth and Density. The Annals of Regional Science 15 (November 1981) 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gober, “Falling Household Size and Its Effect on Metropolitan Growth and Density,” p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• SweetComponents of Change in the Number of Households1970–1980129
   Google Scholar
• RolfGoetzeKent W.ColtonThe Dynamics of Neighborhoods: A Fresh Approach to Understanding Neighborhood ChangeJournal of the American Institute of Planners46April 1980184189
   Google Scholar
• DowellMyersA New Perspective for Planning for More Balanced GrowthGrowth and Change9January 1978813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DowellMyersA New Perspective for Planning for More Balanced GrowthGrowth and Change9January 1978813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gober, “Shrinking Household Size and Its Effect on Urban Population Density Patterns,” pp. 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel T.LictherGlenn V.FuguittTim B.HestonWilliamCliffordComponents of Change in the Residential Concentration of the Elderly Population, 1950–1970Journal of Gerontology36July 1981480489
   Google Scholar