Over-the counter distribution of oral contraceptives

References

• A.G. Rosenfield, D. Maine, M.E. Gorosh. Nonclinical distribution of the Pill in the developing world. International Family Planning Perspectives 6: 1980; 130–136.
   Google Scholar
• A. Kols, W. Rinehart, P.T. Piotrow. Oral contraceptives. Population Reports. 1982; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, May/June.
   Google Scholar
• M. Smith, P. Kane. The pill offprescription. 1975; Birth Control Trust: London.
   Google Scholar
• R. Vernon, G. Ojeda, M.C. Townsend. Contraceptive social marketing and community-based distribution systems in Colombia. Studies in Family Planning 19: 1988; 354–360.
   Google Scholar
• A.L. Juarez. Beyond community based distribution and social marketing of contraceptives: community based marketing of contraceptives. Paper presented to the Expert Group Meeting on Family Planning. 1992; Health and Family Well-Being, for the UN International Conference on Population and Development: Bangalore. 26–30 October.
   Google Scholar
• J. Ross. Communitybased distribution. R. Lapham, G. Simmons. Organizing for Effective Family Planning Programs. 1987; National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• D. Altman, P.T. Piotrow. Social marketing: does it work?. Population Reports. No 21: 1980. Series J.
   Google Scholar
• M.S. Boone, J.U. Farley, S.J. Samuel. A crosscountry study of commercial contraceptive sales programs: factors that lead to success. Studies in Family Planning. 16: 1985; 30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Davies, T.D.J. Louis. Measuring the effectiveness of contraceptive marketing programs: Preethi in Sri Lanka. Studies in Family Planning. 8: 1977; 82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.E. Lande. Pharmacists and family planning. Population Reports. No 4: 1989. Series J.
   Google Scholar
• J.F. Helzner. Assessing strategies to promote high quality care: the case of Profamilia, Dominican Republic Paper presented to American Public Health Association. New York City, 4 October. 1990
   Google Scholar
• J.D. Shelton, M.A. Angle, R.A. Jacobstein. Medical barriers to access to family planning. 340: 1992; 1334–1335.
   Google Scholar
• L.S. Potter. OC effectiveness requires correct and consistent use. Outlook. 9: 1991; 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• J.E. Laing. Continuation and effectiveness of contraceptive practice: a crosssectional approach. Studies in Family Planning. 16: 1985; 138–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.M. Coeytaux, K. Taoufik, M. McEvoy. The role of information, education and communication in family planning service delivery in Tunisia. Studies in Family Planning. 18: 1987; 229–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Trussell, K. Kost. Contraceptive failure in the United States: a critical review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning. 18: 1987; 237–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contraceptive Use: Facts in Brief. 1993; Alan Guttmacher Institute: New York City.
   Google Scholar
• D. Hubacher, L. Potter. Adherence to oral contraceptive regimens in four countries. International Family Planning Perspectives. 19: 1993; 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Jim, Population Council, Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• B. Seaton. Noncompliance among oral contraceptive acceptors in rural Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning. 16: 1985; 52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Adams Hilliard. Oral contraceptive noncompliance: the extent of the problem. Advances in Contraception. 8: 1992; 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• D. Oakley, J. Parent. A scale to measurea microbehaviors of oral contraceptive pill use. Social Biology. 37: 1990; 215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Bailey, J. Correa. Evaluation of the Profamilia rural family planning program. Studies in Family Planning. 6: 1975; 148–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Bruce. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Studies in Family Planning. 21: 1990; 61–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Although the midwives distribute the pills, a doctor is still legally responsible for the procedure.
   Google Scholar
• Dr. Goran Samsioe, University of Lund, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Sweden. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• S.W. Schondelmeyer, J.A. Johnson. Economic implications of switching oral contraceptives to OTC status Paper prepared for the Kaiser Family Foundation Forum, Over-the-Counter Contraceptives. Menlo Park, CA, 8–9 July. 1993
   Google Scholar
• S.C. Stone. Should oral contraceptives be sold overthe-counter?. American Journal of Gynecologic Health. 7: 1993; 27–32.
   Google Scholar