The Challenge of Fundamentalisms

References

• R. Germain, Kyte. The Cairo Consensus: The Right Agenda for the Right rime. 1995; International Women's Health Coalition: New York.
   Google Scholar
• D. Hodgson, S.C. Watkins. Population controllers and feminists: strange bedmates at Cairo?. Paper presented at annual meeting of Population Association of Americ. 9–11 May, New Orleans 1996
   Google Scholar
• N.T. Ammerman, M.E. Marty, R.S. Appleby. North American Protestant fundamentalism. Fundamentalism Observed. 1991; University of Chicago Press: Chicago M.L. Bendroth. Fundamentalism and Gender: 1875 to the Present. 1993; Yale University Press: New Haven.
   Google Scholar
• For a spirited condemnation of both the term and the concept generally, se. J.M. Harris. ‘Fundamentalism’: objections from a modern Jewish historian. J.S. Hawley. Fundamentalism & Gender. 1994; Oxford University Press: New York S.J. Al-Azm. Islamic fundamentalism reconsidered: a critical outline of problems, ideas and approaches. For a review of the debate in the context of Islam specifically, se. South Asia Bulletin. XII(1,2): 1993. Part I. S.J. Al-Azm. Islamic f undamentalism reconsidered: a critical outline of problems, ideas and approaches. South Asia Bulletin. XIV(1): 1994. Part II For a discussion from the activist perspective, se, WAF Joumal. 1(5), particularly Pieterse JN. Fundamentalism discourses: enemy images; and Sahgal G and Yuval-Davis N. The uses of fundamentalis.
   Google Scholar
• Of course, the fact that the phenomenon may be real, does not itself justify the choice of the particular word ‘fundamentalist.’ While bordering dangerously on misnomer (because of the implication that something ‘fundamental’ is also ‘authentic’), I would agree with Marty and Appleby (from whom the phrase ‘family resemblances’ is borrowed) that there is no perfect word available, that alternative suggestions have even more serious defects, and that in any event the term is already firmly entrenched in popular usage-in short, ‘fundamentalism is here to stay.’ Marty and Appleby (eds), [3] abov.
   Google Scholar
• Perhaps the most comprehensive of these is The Fundamentalism Project, sponsored by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Marty and Appleby (eds), [3] abov.
   Google Scholar
• For example, proceedings of the workshop ‘The political uses of religion, ethnicity and culture,’ NGO Forum, ICPD, sponsored by Women Living Under Muslim Laws, Women Against Fundamentalism, and Catholics for a Free Choice. Portions in WAFJournal 7:13–15 and Women's Health Journal 1/96; Full transcripts on file with the author. Als. G. Sahgal, N. Yuval-Davis. Refusing Holy Orders: Women and Fundamentalism in Britain. 1992; Virago Press: London.
   Google Scholar
• Eg. S.I. Ahmed. Blasphemy bill: revenging the war of liberation?. Sanglap: Attack on Fundamentals. 4: 1995; Ain O Salish Kendra: Dhaka, Bangladesh, (Aug). Reprinted i. Fatwas Against Women in Bangladesh. 1996; Grabels, France.
   Google Scholar
• See the essays i. M.E. Marty, R.S. Appleby. Fundamentalism and Society. Reclaiming the Sciences, the Family, and Education. 1993; University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• S. Huntington. The clash of civilizations?. Foreign Affairs. 1993. Summe.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. McClintock. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Conquest. 1996; Routledge: New York L. Ahmed. Women and Genderin Islam. 1992; Yale University Press: New Haven, See The instrumental use of women as the repository and protectors of culture and community identity did not end with the demise of formal colonialism, nor was it unique to the colonial situation. Today, women continue to be both targets and tools in the struggle. V. Moghadam. IdentityPolitics & Women: Cultural Reassertions and Feminisms in International Perspective. 1994; Westvier Press: Boulder CO.
   Google Scholar
• L. Mani. Contentious traditions: the debate on sati in colonial India. K. Sangari, S. Vaid. Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History. 1990; Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Contentious traditions: the debate on sati in colonial Indi. K. Sangari, S. Vaid. Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History. 1990; Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick NJ, 115.
   Google Scholar
• J.S. Hawley. Hinduism: sati and its defenders. J.S. Hawley. Fundamentalism & Gender. 1994; Oxford University Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• C.B. Strozier. Religious militancy or ‘fundamentalism’. J. Kelsay, S.B. Twiss. Religion and Human Rights. 1994; Project on Religion and Human Rights: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad M. 1991. Islamic fundamentalism in South Asia: the Jamat-i-Islami and the Tablighi Jamaat. In Marty and Appleby [3] abov.
   Google Scholar
• Quoted in Hitchcock J,1993. Catholic activist conservatism in the United States. In Marty and Appleby [3] abov.
   Google Scholar
• On the relationship between the discourse of Hindutva, women, law and communal politics in India, se. R. Kapur, B. Cossman. Communalising gender, engendering community: women, legal discourse, and the Saffron Agenda. T. Sarkar, U. Butalia. Women & Right-Wing Movements: Indian Experiences. 1995; Zed Books: New Jersey B. Cossman, R. Kapur. Secularism: bench-marked by Hindu Right. On the critically important relationship betwee. Hindutva. and current legal and political discourse about secularism in India se. Economic and Political Weekly. 1996; 2613–2630. 21 Sept.
   Google Scholar
• F. Shaheed. Controlled or autonomous: identity and the experience of Women Living Under Muslim Laws. Sign. 19(4): 1994; 997–1019.
   Google Scholar
• For a description of this overall strategy, se. F. Shaheed. Networking for change: the role of women's groups in initiating dialogue on women's issues. M. Afkhami. Faith & Freedom: Women's Human Rights in the Muslim World. 1995; Syracuse University Press: Syracuse NY, For a specific example of diversity in actual laws and practices, se. Chart of Customary Practices in Pakistan in Comparison with Statutory Law. 1995; Women & Law Pakistan Country Project: Shirkat Gah, Lahore.
   Google Scholar
• M.R. Anderson. Islamic law and the colonial encounter in British India. D. Arnold, P. Robb. Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader. 1993; Curzon Press: London, Reprinted b. Women Living Under Muslim Laws as. Occasional Paper. 7: 1996. quoting the text of The Hastings Plan of 177.
   Google Scholar
• H. Hoodfar. Devices and desires: population policy and gender roles in the Islamic Republic. Middle East Report. 1994; Sept.–Oct.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kamal. Undermining women's rights. Sanglap: Attack on Fundamentals. 4: 1995; (Aug). In [8] above; Fundamentalism and gender: a view from Bangladesh. Communalism Comba. 1996; 5. April.
   Google Scholar
• An important issue beyond the scope of this paper is the extent to which women are attracted to and participate in fundamentalist movements, even when such movements adopt agendas which include explicit controls over their ability to make choices about key aspects of their live.
   Google Scholar
• J. Conason, A. Ross, L. Cokorinos. The Promise Keepers are coming: the third wave of the religious right. Nation. 1996 7 October.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Se. F. Sabbah. Woman in the Muslim Unconscious. 1984; Pergamon Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley JS, [14] above. Quoting Bhagavad Gita 1.41, as translated by Miller BS, 1986. The Bhagavad Gita. Columbia University Press, New Yor.
   Google Scholar
• F. Mernissi. Femininity as subversion: reflections on the Muslim concept of nushuz. D. Eck, D. Jain. Speaking of Faith: Global Perspectives on Women, Religion and Social Change. 1987; New Society Publishers: Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• H. Papanek. The ideal woman and the ideal society: control and autonomy in the construction of identity. V. Moghadam. Identity Politics & Women: Cultural Reassertions and Feminisms in International Perspective. 1994; Westview Press: Boulder CO.
   Google Scholar
• S. Meznaric. Gender as an ethno-marker: rape, war, and identity politics in the former Yugoslavia. V. Moghadam. Identity Politics & Women: Cultural Reassertions and Feminisms in International Perspective. 1994; Westview Press: Boulder CO Women's Rights Project. The Human Rights Watch Global Report on Women's Human Rights. 1995; Human Rights Watch: New York.
   Google Scholar
• V. Kannabiran, K. Kannabiran. The frying pan or the fire? Endangered identities, gendered institutions and women's survival. T. Sarkar, U. Butalia. Women & Right-Wing Movements: Indian Experiences. 1995; Zed Books: New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• K. Bennoune. SOS Algeria: women's human rights under seige. M. Afkhami. Faith & Freedom: Women's Human Rights in the Muslim World. 1995; Syracuse University Press: Syracuse NY.
   Google Scholar
• S. Maunaguru. Gendering Tamil nationalism: the construction of ‘woman’ in projects of protest and control. P. Jeganathan, Q. Ismail. Unmaking the Nation: The Politics of Identity and History in Modern Sri Lanka. 1995; Social Scientists' Association: Colombo.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Eisenstein. Hatreds: Racialized and Sexualized Conflicts in the 21st Century. 1996; Routledge: New York.
   Google Scholar
• R. Boston. The Most Dangerous Man in America? Pat Robertson and the Rise ofthe Christian Coalition. 1996; Prometheus Books: Amherst NY.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Post. 23 August. 1992. Hawley and Proudfoot note that ‘fundamentalist rhetoric is often tinged with the suggestion that homosexuality is an inevitable consequence of modernism- a sign of the dishonor and downright emasculation that the collapse of traditional values visits on secular societies. In Introduction, Hawley JS (ed). [4] abov.
   Google Scholar
• The strand of US right-wing ideology that focuses on the ‘racial purity’ of white, Christian civilisation fords a comfortable home among ‘Patriot’ groups, such as those subscribing to the Phineas Priesthood, who justify murders and hate crimes with reference to a Biblical passag. (numbers. 25:1–18) which they interpret as condoning murder to prevent racial mixing in violation of ‘God's law’. Paul Hill, confessed murderer of a doctor at a US abortion clinic, was among those calling for such ‘Phineas actions’. Terrorists in the name of God and rac. Klanwatch Intelligence Report. 1996; 83(Aug).
   Google Scholar
• S. Amin, S. Hossain. Women's reproductive rights and the politics of fundamentalism: a view from Bangladesh. American University Law Review. 44(4): 1995; 1319–1343. see also [8] abov.
   Google Scholar
• I am grateful to Mahnaz Afkhami, executive director, Sisterhood Is Global Institute, for articulating this aspect of fundamentalists’ strategies and for several of the examples used here.
   Google Scholar
• Religious human rights in the world today: a report on the 1994 Atlanta conference. Emory International Law Review. 10: 1995; 53–193. (1. A. An-Naim. The dichotomy between religious and secular discourse in Islamic societies. & Freedom: Women's Human Rights in the Muslim World Afkhami, Faith, M. 1995; Syracuse University Press: Syracuse NY.
   Google Scholar
• R. Copelon, R. Petchesky. Toward an interdependent approach to reproductive and sexual rights as human rights: reflections on the ICPD and beyond. M. Schuler. From Basic Needs to Basic Rights. 1995; Women, Law & Development International: Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• L. Freedman. Reflections on emerging frameworks of health and human rights. Health and Human Rights. 1(4): 1995; 314–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. Mertus. in collaboration with Dutt M. and Flowers N. Our Human Rights: A Manual for Women's Human Rights. 1995; Organising Committee, People's Decade for Human Rights Education: New York M. Afkhami, H. Vaziri. Claiming Our Rights: A Manual for Women's Human Rights in Muslim Societies. 1996; Sisterhood Is Global Institute: Washington DC A.E. Yamin. Empowering visions: toward a dialectical pedagogy of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 15: 1993; 640–685.
   Google Scholar
• S. Greenhalgh. The social construction of population science: an intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 38(1): 1996; 26–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh goes on to critique ‘diffusion theory’, the rationale used in family planning work to justify the programmatic focus on spreading contraceptives, and draws this conclusion: ‘Through its silence about the structures that support diffusion and its implicit assumption that the place of origin is superior to the place of destination, the notion of diffusion in fact supports a political project, that of justifying efforts to spread modern contraceptives to benighted “traditional” people. Unintentional though it may be, demographic research serves the political goal of “making them more like us.” In [441 abov.
   Google Scholar
• A. Razzaq, A. Keynote paper. Seminar on the Cairo Conference on Population and Development: Human Rights and Moral Issue. 1994. Quoted in Amin and Hossain. [38] abov.
   Google Scholar