Detubularised isolated ureterosigmoidostomy (Atta pouch): Manometric and radiological studies in a sample of patientsFootnote

Peer review under responsibility of Arab Association of Urology.

References

• D.M.ParkinF.BrayJ.FerlayP.PisaniGlobal cancer statistics, 2002CA Cancer J Clin55200574108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavan S, Bray F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Goodman M, Jemal A. International variations in bladder cancer incidence and mortality. Eur Urol 2013 October 16; doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.001. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program. SEER stat fact sheets: bladder cancer. Available at <http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/urinb>.
   Google Scholar
• J.FerlayH.R.ShinF.BrayD.FormanC.MathersD.M.ParkinD.M.ParkinEstimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008. GLOBOCAN 2008Int J Cancer2010127200828932917
   Google Scholar
• H.KhaledSystematic management of bladder cancer in Egypt: revisitedJ Egypt Natl Cancer Inst172005127131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trulson JJ, Sharma P, Haden T, Kheterpal E, Pokala N. Comparative survival following different treatment modalities for stage T2 bladder cancer in octogenarians. World J Urol 2013 July 2. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• D.J.GallagherM.I.MilowskyBladder cancerCurr Treat Options Oncol102009205215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P.SteinG.LieskovskyR.CoteS.GroshenA.C.FengS.Boydet alRadical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1054 patientsJ Clin Oncol192001666675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.E.MohamedP.Chaoprang HerreraS.HudsonT.A.RevensonC.T.LeeD.Z.Qualeet alMuscle invasive bladder cancer. Examining survivor burden and unmet needsJ Urol19120144853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witjes JA, Compérat E, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Gakis G, Lebret T, et al. EAU Guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: Summary of the 2013 Guidelines. Eur Urol 2013 Dec 12. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Singh V, Yadav R, Sinha RJ, Gupta DK. Prospective comparison of quality-of-life outcomes between ileal conduit urinary diversion and orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy: a statistical model. BJU Int 2013 September 5. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• J.E.MontieJ.E.PontesE.M.SmythSelection of the type of urinary diversion in conjunction with radical cystectomyJ Urol137198711541155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A.ElmajianJ.P.SteinD.EsrigJ.A.FreemanE.C.SkinnerS.D.Boydet alThe Kock ileal neobladder: updated experience in 295 male patientsJ Urol1561996920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.E.HautmannR.de PetriconiH.W.GottfriedK.KleinschmidtR.MattesT.PaissThe ileal neobladder. Complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followupJ Urol1611999422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.M.KoraitimM.A.AttaM.K.FodaOrthotopic bladder substitution in men revisited. Identification of continence predictorsJ Urol176200620812084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.LeissnerR.SteinR.HohenfellnerRadical cystoprostatectomy combined with Mainz Pouch bladder substitution to the urethra: long-term resultsBJU Int831999964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.A.MtetaA.Y.Al-AmmaryModified ureterosigmoidostomy for malignant and non malignant conditionsEast Afr Med J852008334340
   Google Scholar
• I.IgnjatovicD.BasicModified Mainz pouch II (sigma rectum pouch) urinary diversion: 12 years experienceActa Chir Iugosl5420077377
   Google Scholar
• Z.DzamicJ.Hadzi DjokicM.AcimovicM.JovanovicJ.FilimonovicC.Tulicet alModified Mainz pouch II urinary diversion and quality of lifeActa Chir Iugosl5420075762
   Google Scholar
• P.J.BastianP.AlbersA.HaferkampS.SchumacherS.C.MullerModified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz pouch II) in different age groups and with different techniques of ureteric implantationBJU Int942004345349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A.AttaDetubularized isolated ureterosigmoidostomy. Description of a new technique and preliminary resultsJ Urol1561996915919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A.AttaThe everting suture: a new technical aid for ureteral nipple constructionJ Urol155199613721373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B.FarnhamM.S.CooksonSurgical complications of urinary diversionWorld J Urol222004157167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.D.MillsU.E.StuderMetabolic consequences of continent urinary diversionJ Urol161199910571066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.AustenT.KalbleSecondary malignancies in different forms of urinary diversion using isolated gutJ Urol1722004831838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J.BastianP.AlbersH.Hanitzschet alHealth related quality of life following modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz pouch II) as continent urinary diversionEur Urol462004591597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.D’eliaS.PahernikM.FischR.HohenfellnerJ.W.ThüroffMainz pouch II technique: 10 years’ experienceBJU Int93200410371042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.B.Hadzi-DjokicD.T.BasicA modified sigma-rectum pouch (Mainz pouch II) technique. Analysis of outcomes and complications on 220 patientsBJU Int972006587591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.IshigookaT.HashimotoK.IzumiyaI.SasagawaT.NakadaIncidence of anal incontinence after long-term follow-up of patients treated with ureterosigmoidostomyInt Urol Nephrol251993455460
   Google Scholar
• C.ObekA.R.KuralS.AtausE.CoskunerO.DemirkesenA.Citçiet alComplications of the Mainz pouch II (sigma rectum pouch)Eur Urol392001204211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.R.WoodhouseM.ChristofidesModified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz II) technique and early resultsBr J Urol811998247252
   Google Scholar
• M.FischR.WammackS.C.MüllerR.HohenfellnerThe Mainz pouch IIEur Urol251994715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.GiljaM.KovacicM.RadejD.KosutaB.BakulaL.GolesThe sigmoidorectal pouch (Mainz pouch II)Eur Urol291996210215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.GumusC.MirogluL.SaportaG.BasaranK.HorasanliO.Tanriverdiet alRectodynamic and radiological assessment in modified Mainz pouch II casesEur Urol382000316322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.KälbleA.R.TrickerP.FriedlR.WaldherrJ.HoangG.Staehleret alUreterosigmoidostomy. Long-term results, risk of carcinoma and etiological factors for carcinogenesisJ Urol144199011101114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.F.GittesCarcinogenesis in ureterosigmoistomyUrol Clin N Am131986201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.M.CrisseyG.D.SteeleR.F.GittesRat model for carcinogenesis in ureterosigmoidostomyScience20719801079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.H.RobinovitchUreterosigmoidostomy in children – revival or demise?J Urol1241980552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar