Critical appraisal of literature comparing minimally invasive extraperitoneal and transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysisFootnote

Peer review under responsibility of Arab Association of Urology.

References

• A.HeidenreichJ.BellmuntM.BollaS.JoniauM.MasonV.Matveevet al.EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised diseaseEur Urol5920116171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.W.SchuesslerP.G.SchulamR.V.ClaymanL.R.KavoussiLaparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experienceUrology501997854857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A.CapelloJ.BoczkoH.R.PatelJ.V.JosephRandomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomyJ Endourol21200711991202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Green S (editors). Cochrane TAJU_A_12056801 for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://TAJU_A_12056801.cochrane.org. Accessed July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• B.P.RaiM.ShelleyB.ColesC.S.BiyaniI.El-MokademG.NabiSurgical management for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinomaCochrane Database Syst Rev42011 CD007349
   Google Scholar
• D.MitropoulosW.ArtibaniM.GraefenM.RemziM.RouprêtM.TrussReporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and RecommendationsEur Urol612012341349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.AtugE.P.CastleM.WoodsS.K.SrivastavR.ThomasR.DavisTransperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other?Urology68200610771081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.J.BivalacquaE.M.SchaefferH.AlphsL.MetteeA.A.WagnerL.M.Suet al.Intraperitoneal effects of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomyUrology722008273277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A.BrownD.RodinB.LeeD.M.DahlTransperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an assessment of 156 casesUrology652005320324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.CathelineauD.CahillH.WidmerF.RozetH.BaumertG.VallancienTransperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a false debate over a real challengeJ Urol1712004714716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.AndersonB.AyresR.IssaM.PerryE.LiatsikosJ.U.Stolzenburget al.Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison with transperitoneal techniqueWorld J Clin Urol2201339
   Google Scholar
• J.S.ChungW.T.KimW.S.HamH.S.YuY.ChaeS.H.Chunget al.Comparison of oncological results, functional outcomes, and complications for transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's experienceJ Endourol252011787792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.G.EdenD.KingG.G.KooimanT.H.AdamsM.E.SullivanJ.A.VassTransperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does the approach matter?J Urol172200422182223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.ErdogruD.TeberT.FredeR.MarreroA.HammadyO.Seemannet al.Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysisEur Urol462004312320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.L.GaoJ.T.WuK.WangL.WangD.D.YangL.Shiet al.Comparison of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomyChin Med J (Engl)119200621252128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.HorstmannC.VollmerC.SchwabM.KurzC.PadevitK.Hortonet al.Single-centre evaluation of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approach in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomyScand J Urol Nephrol462012117123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.HoznekP.AntiphonT.BorkowskiM.T.GettmanR.KatzL.Salomonet al.Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomyUrology612003617622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.L.JacobsJ.S.MontgomeryR.L.DunnA.Z.WeizerD.C.MillerD.P.Woodet al.A comparison of extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal approaches for robotic prostatectomySurg Innov192012268274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.MadiS.DaignaultD.P.WoodExtraperitoneal v intraperitoneal robotic prostatectomy: analysis of operative outcomesJ Endourol21200715531557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.PhinthusophonC.NualyongS.SrinualnadT.TaweemonkongsapT.AmornvesukijLaparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomyJ Med Assoc Thai90200726442650
   Google Scholar
• F.PorpigliaC.TerroneR.TarabuzziM.BilliaS.GrandeF.Mussoet al.Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single centerUrology682006376380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.RemziH.C.KlinglerM.V.TinzlY.K.FongM.LoddeB.Kisset al.Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomyEur Urol4820058389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.RuizL.SalomonA.HoznekD.VordosR.YiouA.de la Tailleet al.Comparison of early oncologic results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approachEur Urol4620045056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.M.SiqueiraJrA.I.MitreR.J.DuarteH.NascimentoF.BarretoE.Falcaoet al.Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy during the learning curve: does the surgical approach affect the complication rate?Int Braz J Urol362010450457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.S.LeeW.S.HamW.T.KimH.J.JooJ.S.LeeY.D.ChoiComparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: a single surgeon’s experienceKorean J Urol502009251255
   Google Scholar
• J.C.GoldsackS.S.SonnadChanging trends in surgical research: an analysis of 30 years of collaborative practicesJAMA Surg1492014873874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.AtugR.ThomasTransperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which one?Minerva Urol Nefrol592007143147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J.U.StolzenburgM.DoH.PfeifferF.KonigB.AedtnerW.DorschnerThe endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experienceWorld J Urol2020024855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.U.StolzenburgR.RabenaltM.DoL.C.HornE.N.LiatsikosModular training for residents with no prior experience with open pelvic surgery in endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomyEur Urol492006491500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.U.StolzenburgJ.WasserscheidR.RabenaltM.DoT.SchwalenbergA.McNeillet al.Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestrationWorld J Urol262008581586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.DahmJ.N’DowL.HolmbergF.HamdyThe future of randomised controlled trials in urologyEur Urol66201413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.HirstR.A.AghaD.RosinP.McCullochHow can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for actionInt J Surg11201310381042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar