Historical note: How bringing women’s health advocacy groups to WHO helped change the research agenda

References

• P.R. See Ehrlich. The population bomb. New York: Ballentine Books; 1968. Fears of a “population explosion” were widespread in the 1950s and 60s, but the book and its author brought the idea to an even wider audience. The book has been criticized since its publication for its alarmist tone, and in recent decades for its inaccurate predictions. 1968
   Google Scholar
• See, for example, Coote A and Campbell B. Sweet freedom: the struggle for women's liberation. 1987; Basil Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Reproduced in Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR). Newsletter. 31: Oct-Dec 1989
   Google Scholar
• M. Daswani. Women against injectables. search of our bodies. June. 1987; Shakti: Bombay.
   Google Scholar
• Creating common ground: women's perspectives on the selection and introduction of fertility regulation technologies. Report of a meeting between women's health advocates and scientists, Geneva, 20-22 February, 1991. 1991; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Creating common ground in Asia: women's perspectives on the selection and introduction of fertility regulation technologies. Report of a meeting between women's health advocates, researchers, providers and policy-makers, Manila, 5-8 October, 1992. 1992; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Creating common ground in Africa: women's needs and perspectives in reproductive health. Report of an African Regional Workshop, 24-26 November, 1993. 1994; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Perspectivas de mujeres sobre la salud reproductiva en América Latina. Informe sobre una reunión entre mujeres activistas de la salud, investigadores y los responsables políticos, San Domingo, julio 1995. 1995; World Health Organisation: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Creating common ground in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: women's needs and gender perspectives in reproductive health in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Report of an intercountry meeting between women's health advocates, researchers, service providers and policy-makers, Casablanca, 10-13 November 1997. 1997; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Fertility regulating vaccines. Report of a meeting between women's health advocates and scientists to review the current status of the development of fertility regulating vaccines, Geneva, 17-18 August 1992. 1992; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Fertility regulating vaccines: ethical considerations. Report of a meeting between women's health advocates and scientists. 1994; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• N. Ortayli, A. Bulut, H. Nalbant. Is the diaphragm a viable option for women in Turkey?. International Family Planning Perspectives. 26(1): 2000; 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bulut, N. Ortayli, K. Ringheim. Assessing the acceptability, service delivery requirements, and use-effectiveness of the diaphragm in Colombia, Philippines and Turkey. Contraception. 63: 2001; 267–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The safety and feasibility of female condom reuse. Report of a WHO consultation. 26-31 January 2002
   Google Scholar
• See The WHO Strategic Approach to strengthening sexual and reproductive health policies and programmes. 2007; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• External evaluation. Gender and Rights Advisory Panel, 2002-2012. 2014; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Transforming health systems: gender and rights in reproductive health. A training manual for health system managers. 2001; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Sexual and reproductive health: core competencies in primary health care. 2011; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar