The contingency of Senate consent: a study of the determinants of roll call confirmation voting on executive branch appointments, 1945–1996

References

• Abraham, H. J. (1985). Justices and presidents (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• N.BeckJ.N.Katz What to do with times-series—cross-section data in comparative politics American Political Science Review 89 1995 634 647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, L. S. (1987). The New American presidency. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, J. R., & Fleisher R. (1990). The president in the legislative arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• C.CameronA.D.CoverJ.A.Segal Senate voting on supreme court nominees: A neoinstitutional model American Political Science Review 84 1990 525 534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, A. R. (1973). How congressmen decide: A policy focus. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• K.CollierT.Sullivan New evidence undercutting the linkage of approval with presidential support and influence Journal of Politics 57 1995 197 209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congressional Quarterly, Inc. (1946–1996). Congressional quarterly’s weekly reports. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1993). Legislative leviathan: Party government in the house. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• R.A.Dahl Myth of the presidential mandate Political Science Quarterly 105 1990 355 366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deering, C. J. (1987). Damned if you do and damned if you don’t: The Senate’s role in the appointment process. In G. C. Mackenzie (Ed.), The in-and-outers: Presidential appointees and transient government in Washington. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, G. C., III. (1989). At the margins: Presidential leadership of congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felice, J. D., & Weisberg H. F. (1988–1989). The changing importance of ideology, party, and region in confirmation of Supreme Court nominees, 1953–1988. Kentucky Law Journal, 77, 509–538.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, L. (1987). Fifty years of presidential appointments. In G. C. Mackenzie (Ed.), The in-and-outers: Presidential appointees and transient government in Washington. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• T.H.HammondJ.Hill Deference or preference? Explaining Senate confirmation of presidential nominees to administrative agencies Journal of Theoretical Politics 5 1993 23 59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. P. (1953). The advice and consent of the Senate: A study of the confirmation of appointments by the United States Senate. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1977). A government of strangers: Executive politics in Washington. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. O. (1994). The presidency in a separated system. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• J.D.KingJ.RiddlespergerJr. Senate confirmation of cabinet nominations: Institutional politics and nominee qualifications The Social Science Journal 33 1996 273 285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1989). Congressmen’s voting decisions (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• K.Krehbiel Where’s the party? British Journal of Political Science 23 1993 235 266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.S.KrutzR.FleisherJ.R.Bond From Abe Fortas to Zoe Baird: Why some presidential nominations fail in the Senate American Political Science Review 92 1998 871 881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, P. C. (1982). The president’s agenda: Domestic policy choice from Kennedy to Carter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, G. C. (1981). The politics of presidential appointments. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis Who’s Who, Inc. (1945–1997). Who’s who in America. Annual issues. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Massaro, J. (1990). Supremely political: The role of ideology and presidential management in unsuccessful supreme court nominations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• T.Moe Control and feedback: The case of the NLRB American Political Science Review 79 1985 1094 1116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neustadt, R. (1990). Presidential power: The politics of leadership. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• L.M.OverbyB.M.HenschenM.WalshJ.Strauss Courting constituents? An analysis of the Senate confirmation vote on Justice Clarence Thomas American Political Science Review 86 1992 997 1003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.C.PattersonG.A.Caldeira Party voting in the United States Congress British Journal of Political Science 18 1988 111 131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (1995). The president and Congress. In M. Nelson (Ed.), The presidency and the political system. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, L. (1996). Vital statistics on the presidency. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• D.RiversN.Rose Passing the President’s program: Public opinion and presidential influence in Congress American Journal of Political Science 29 1985 183 196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, D. W. (1991). Parties and leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• D.W.RohdeD.M.Simon Presidential vetoes and congressional response: A study of institutional conflict American Journal of Political Science 29 1985 397 427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.S.Ruckman The Supreme Court, critical nominations, and the Senate confirmation process Journal of Politics 49 1993 793 805
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, A. M., Jr. (1973). The imperial Presidency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. E. (1979). Ideological coalitions in Congress. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Scigliano, R. (1971). The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• J.A.Segal Senate confirmation of Supreme Court Justices: Partisan and institutional politics Journal of Politics 49 1987 998 1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A.SegalC.M.CameronA.D.Cover A spatial model of roll call voting: Senators, constituents, presidents, and interest groups in Supreme Court confirmations American Journal of Political Science 36 1992 96 121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A.SegalA.D.CoverC.M.Cameron The role of ideology in Senate confirmation of Supreme Court Justices Kentucky Law Journal 77 1988–1989 485 507
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. A., & Spaeth, H. (1993). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D.R.Songer The relevance of policy values for the confirmation of Supreme Court nominees Law and Society Review 13 1979 927 947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.Sulfridge Ideology as a factor in Senate Consideration of Supreme Court Nominations Journal of Politics 42 1980 560 567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, G., & Stookey, J. A. (1995). Shaping America: The politics of Supreme Court appointments. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• A.Wildavsky The two Presidencies Transaction 4 1966 4 7
   Google Scholar