Response bias in opinion polls and American social welfare

References

• J.R.BaggetteY.ShapiroL.R.JacobsThe polls—poll trends: Social Security—an updatePublic Opinion Quarterly591995420442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M.BassResponse bias in studying hospice clients’ needsOmega1341982305318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.BeenstockE.GoldinY.HaitovskyResponse bias in a conjoint analysis of power outagesEnergy Economics2021998135156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.BeirneB.PerryCriminal victimization in the industrialized worldCrime, Law and Social Change2021994155165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.M.BongersL.A.van de GoorH.F.GarretsenH.A.van OersAggregate comparisons of self-reported versus nonself-reported drinking in a general population surveySubstance Use & Misuse3431999421441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.BurtonE.BlairTask conditions, response formulation processes, and response accuracy for behavioral frequency questions in surveysPublic Opinion Quarterly5519915079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.CasswellModerate drinkng and population-based alcohol policyContemporary Drug Problems2121994287299
   Google Scholar
• J.A.CataniaH.TurnerR.C.PierceE.GoldenC.StockingD.BinsonResponse bias in surveys of AIDS-related sexual behaviorD.G.OstrowP.C.KesslerMethodological issues in AIDS behavioral research1993Plenum PressNew York
   Google Scholar
• F.L.CookE.J.BarrettSupport for the American welfare state1992Columbia University PressNew York
   Google Scholar
• P.DiMaggioJ.EvansB.BrysonHave Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized?American Journal of Sociology10231996690755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.W.DomhoffState autonomy or class dominance1996Aldine de GruyterHawthorne, NY
   Google Scholar
• B.G.EmbreeP.C.WhiteheadValidity and reliability of self-reported drinking behavior: Dealing with the problem of response biasJournal of Studies on Alcohol5431993334344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.M.EpsteinWelfare in America: How social science fails the poor1997University of Wisconsin PressMadison, WI
   Google Scholar
• W.M.EpsteinCleavage in American attitudes toward social welfareJournal of Sociology and Social Welfare3142004175199
   Google Scholar
• T.GitlinThe twilight of common dreams1995Henry HoltNew York
   Google Scholar
• M.GoodfellowN.KiernanF.AhernM.A.SmyerResponse bias using two-stage data collection: A study of elderly participants in a programEvaluation Review1261988638654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.GordonSocial insurance and public assistance: The influence of gender in welfare thought in the United States, 1890–1930American Historical Review1992, February
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.GoreyR.W.RiceG.C.BriceThe prevalence of elder care responsibilities among the work force population: Response bias among a group of cross-sectional surveysResearch on Aging1431992399418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D.HunterCulture wars: The struggle to define America1991Basic BooksNew York
   Google Scholar
• D.HawksA review of current guidelines on moderate drinking for individual consumersContemporary Drug Problems2121994223237
   Google Scholar
• B.HayslipJ.HoffmanD.WeatherlyResponse bias in hospice evaluationOmega22119906374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A.JohnsonD.R.GersteinK.A.RasinskiAdjusting survey estimates for response bias: An application to trends in alcohol and marijuana usePublic Opinion Quarterly6331998354377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.C.LaSalaClient satisfaction: Consideration of correlates and response biasFamilies in Society78119975464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.H.MarquisM.S.MarquisJ.M.PolichResponse bias and reliability in sensitive topic surveysJournal of the American Statistical Association811986381389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.F.MartellWhat mediates gender bias in work behavior ratingsSex Roles343–41996153169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D.MillerComplexities of the randomized response solutionAmerican Sociological Review461981928930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.J.MolenaarRecent methodological studies on survey questioningQuality and Quantity251991167187
   Google Scholar
• J.C.MooreL.L.StinsonE.J.WelniakJr.Income measurement error in surveys: A reviewJournal of Official Statistics1642000331361
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2001). High School and Youth Trends (Infofax). http://www.nida.nih.gov/Infofax/HSYputhtrends.html.
   Google Scholar
• M.T.OrneOn the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.American Psychologist1962776783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.I.PageR.Y.ShapiroThe rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences1992University of Chicago PressChicago
   Google Scholar
• Public Agenda. (1995). The values we live by: What Americans want from welfare reform. New York: Public Agenda.
   Google Scholar
• J.RabowC.A.NeumanGarbaeology as a method of cross-validating interview data on sensitive topicsSociology and Social Research6841984480497
   Google Scholar
• N.C.SchaefferJ.A.SeltzerM.KlawitterEstimating nonresponse and response bias: Resident and nonresident parents’ reports about child supportSociological Methods and Research20119913059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E.SchiltzPublic attitudes toward Social Security: 1935–19651970Unites States Department of Health, Education, and WelfareWashington, DC
   Google Scholar
• R.Y.ShapiroK.D.PattersonJ.T.YoungThe polls: Public assistancePublic Opinion Quarterly511987120130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.SingleImplications of potential health benefits of moderate drinking for specific elements of alcohol policy: Towards a harm-reduction approach for alcoholContemporary Drug Problems2121994273285
   Google Scholar
• T.SkocpolSocial policy in the United States: Future possibilities in historical perspective1995Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJ
   Google Scholar
• Teles, S. M. (1998). Whose welfare? AFDC and elite politics. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• P.E.TracyJ.A.FoxThe validity of randomized response for sensitive measurementsAmerican Sociological Review461981187200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.N.UmeshR.A.PetersonA critical evaluation of the randomized response methodSociological Methods & Research2011991104138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.VeenhovenAre the Russians as unhappy as they say they are?: Comparability of self-reports across nationsJournal of Happiness Studies222001111136
   Google Scholar
• K.WarrinerAccuracy of self-reports to the burdensome question: Accuracy of self-reportsQuality and Quantity2531991253269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.K.WeaverR.Y.ShapiroL.R.JacobsThe polls-trends: WelfarePublic Opinion Quarterly591995606627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.H.WeinbergC.T.NelsonM.I.RoemerE.J.WelniakEconomic well-being in the United States: How much improvement?AEA Papers and Proccedings89219991822
   Google Scholar
• M.W.WiedermanThe truth must be in here somewhere: Examining the gender discrepancy in self-reported lifetime number of sex partnersJournal of Sex Research3441997375386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar