References
- R.H.BoykoA.R.BoykoM.G.BoykoReferee bias contributes to home advantage in English Pemiership footballJournal of Sports Sciences25200711851194
- G.BrookerT.D.KlastorinTo the victors belong the spoils? Assessing the link between athletics and alumni givingSocial Science Quarterly771981789803
- S.B.CaudillF.G.MixonJr.Winning and ticket allotments in college footballThe Social Science Journal331996451457
- R.H.FrankChallenging the myth: A review of the links among college athletic success, student quality, and donations2004The Knight Foundation Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics
- G.LangelettThe relationship between recruiting and team performance in Division 1A college footballJournal of Sports Economics42003240245
- R.E.McCormickM.TinsleyAthletics and academics: A model of university contributionsB.L.GoffR.D.TollisonSportometrics1990Texas A&M University PressCollege Station, TX193206
- F.G.MixonJr.L.J.TreviñoFrom kickoff to commencement: The positive role of intercollegiate athletics in higher educationEconomics of Education Review24200597102
- F.G.MixonJr.L.J.TreviñoT.C.MintoTouchdowns and test scores: Exploring the relationship between athletics and academicsApplied Economics Letters112004421424
- I.B.TuckerBig-time pigskin success: Is there an advertising effect?Journal of Sports Economics62005222229
- I.B.TuckerA re-examination of the effect of big-time football and basketball success on graduation rates and alumni giving ratesEconomics of Education Review232004655661
- I.B.TuckerL.T.AmatoA reinvestigation of the relationship between big-time basketball success and average SAT scoresJournal of Sports Economics72006428440
- C.TurnerIt was 15 years ago: Iron Bowl changed when Crimson Tide had to go to Auburn.The Decatur Daily (Online Edition)1118200418