The effect of “sunshine” on policy deliberation: The case of the Federal Open Market Committee

References

• J.BessetteThe mild voice of reason: Deliberative democracy and American national government1994University of Chicago PressChicago, IL
   Google Scholar
• S.BickfordBeyond friendship: Aristotle conflict, deliberation, and attentionJournal of Politics581996398421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.BlackS.BurkhalterJ.GastilJ.Stromer-GalleyMethods for analyzing and measuring group deliberationE.BucyL.HolbertThe sourcebook for political communication research2013RoutledgeNew York, NY
   Google Scholar
• A.BlinderCentral banking in theory and practice1998MIT PressCambridge, MA
   Google Scholar
• A.BlinderThe quiet revolution: Central banking goes modern2004Yale University PressNew Haven, CT
   Google Scholar
• J.BohmanPublic deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy1996The MIT PressCambridge, MA
   Google Scholar
• J.BohmanW.RehgDeliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics1999The MIT PressCambridge, MA
   Google Scholar
• S.ChambersBehind closed doors: Publicity, secrecy, and the quality of deliberationThe Journal of Political Philosophy122004389410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.ChappellR.McGregorT.VermilyeaCommittee decisions on monetary policy: Evidence from historical records of the Federal Open Market Committee2005MIT PressCambridge, MA
   Google Scholar
• J.CohenAn epistemic conception of democracyEthics9719862638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.CohenDeliberation and democratic legitimacyA.HamlinP.PettitThe good polity: Normative analysis of the state1989Basil BlackwellOxford
   Google Scholar
• J.CohenProcedure and substance in deliberative democracyS.BenhabibDemocracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political1996Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJ
   Google Scholar
• C.CroweE.MeadeCentral bank independence and transparency: Evolution and effectiveness2008International Monetary Fund working paper
   Google Scholar
• N.DincerB.EichengreenCentral bank transparency and independence: Updates and new measuresInternational Journal of Central Banking1012014189253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.EijffingerR.MahieuL.RaesHawks and doves at the FOMC2015European Banking Center 2015-003
   Google Scholar
• J.ElsterDeliberative democracy1998Cambridge University PressCambridge
   Google Scholar
• A.FloriniThe right to know: Transparency for an open world2007Columbia University PressNew York, NY
   Google Scholar
• A.FungInfotopia: Unleashing the democratic power of transparencyPolitics & Society412013183212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.FryD.JuliusL.MahadevaS.RogerG.SterneKey issues in the choice of monetary policy frameworkL.MahadevaG.SterneMonetary policy frameworks in a global context2000RoutledgeNew York, NY
   Google Scholar
• P.GeraatsTransparency and reputation: The publication of central bank forecastsTopics in Macroeconomics512005126
   Google Scholar
• S.GolubA.KayaM.ReayWhat were they thinking? The Federal Reserve in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisisReview of International Political Economy201410.1080/09692290.2014.932829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.GoodfriendHow the world achieved consensus on monetary policy2007NBER Working Paper 13580
   Google Scholar
• A.GreenspanStatement to the congress, October 19, 1993Federal Reserve Bulletin7912199311071110
   Google Scholar
• J.GrimmerB.StewartText as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political textsPolitical Analysis212013267297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.GutmannD.ThompsonDemocracy and disagreement1996The Belknap Press of Harvard University PressCambridge, MA
   Google Scholar
• J.HabermasThree normative models of democracyS.BenhabibDemocracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political1996Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJ
   Google Scholar
• C.HoodAccountability and transparency: Siamese twins, matching parts, awkward couple?West European Politics3320109891009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.JacobsF.CookM.Delli CarpiniTalking together: Public deliberation and political participation in America2009University of Chicago PressChicago, IL
   Google Scholar
• S.KosackA.FungDoes transparency improve governance?Annual Review of Political Science1720146587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.KarpowitzT.MendelbergThe silent sex: Gender, deliberation, and institutions2014Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJ
   Google Scholar
• J.KnightJ.JohnsonWhat sort of equality does deliberative democracy require?J.BohmanW.RehgDeliberative democracy1999The MIT PressCambridge, MA
   Google Scholar
• D.LindseyA modern history of FOMC communication: 1975–20022003Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Retrieved from www.fraser.stlouisfed.org/docs/publications/books/20030624_lindsey_modhistfomc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• E.Meade EllenThe FOMC: Preferences, voting, and consensusFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review87March/April part 1200593101
   Google Scholar
• E.MeadeD.StasavageThe dangers of increased transparency in monetary policymakingEconomic Journal2008695717
   Google Scholar
• H.MercierH.LandemoreReasoning is for arguing: Understanding the successes and failures of deliberationPolitical Psychology3322012243258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.MayerA Term at the Fed: An insider’s view2004Harper BusinessNew York, NY
   Google Scholar
• G.MucciaroniP.QuirkDeliberative choices2006University of Chicago PressChicago, IL
   Google Scholar
• D.NaurinDeliberation behind closed doors2007ECPR PressColchester, UK
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B. (2009). Memorandum on transparency and open government, January 21. Peters, G. & Woolley, J. T. The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/%3Fpid=85677.
   Google Scholar
• J.ParkinsonJ.MansbridgeDeliberative systems2012Cambridge University PressNew York, NY
   Google Scholar
• E.PatrikisNo don’t ‘audit the fed’Wall Street Journal2015 online at http://www.wsj.com/article_email/ernie-patrikis-no-dont-audit-the-fed-1426633745-lMyQjAxMTA1NTExODAxMjgwWj
   Google Scholar
• A.RobertsBlacked out: Government secrecy in the information age2006Cambridge University PressNew York, NY
   Google Scholar
• S.RosenbergTypes of discourse and the democracy of deliberationS.RosenbergDeliberation, participation and democracy2007Palgrave MacmillanNew York, NY
   Google Scholar
• L.SandersAgainst deliberationPolitical Theory251997347376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.Schonhardt-BaileyDeliberating American monetary policy: A textual analysis2013MIT PressCambridge, MA
   Google Scholar
• D.StasavageOpen-door or closed-door? Transparency in domestic and international bargainingInternational Organization5842004667703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.StasavagePolarization and publicity: Rethinking the benefits of deliberative democracyThe Journal of Politics6920075972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.SteinerA.BächtigerM.SpörndliM.SteenbergenDeliberative politics in action: Analyzing parliamentary discourse2004Cambridge University PressNew York, NY
   Google Scholar
• D.ThompsonDemocratic secrecyPolitical Science Quarterly11421999181193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.ThorntonWhen did the FOMC begin targeting the federal funds rate? What the verbatim transcripts tell usJournal of Money, Credit and Banking38200620392071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.WarshTransparency and the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee2014 Retrieved from http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/news/2014/warsh.pdf
   Google Scholar
• I.YoungActivist challenges to deliberative democracyJ.FishkinP.LaslettDebating deliberative democracy. Philosophy, politics and society Vol. 7 (2003) Blackwell. Malden, MA.
   Google Scholar