References
- N.R.AhlfingerJ.K.EsserTesting the groupthink model: Effects of promotional leadership and conformity predispositionSocial Behavior and Personality: An International Journal29120013142
- L.A.BrandB.R.NoonSeasonal Fecundity and source-sink status of shrub-nesting birds in a desert riparian corridorThe Wilson Journal of Ornithology12320114858
- J.BoydA.KrupnickUsing ecological production theory to define and select environmental commodities for nonmarket valuationAgricultural and Resource Economics Review4212013132
- J.BoydS.BanzhafWhat are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting unitsEcological Economics632–32007616626
- C.D.BroadbentD.S.BrookshireD.GoodrichM.D.DixonL.A.BrandJ.ThacherValuing preservation and restoration alternatives for ecosystem services in the southwestern USAEcohydrology852015851862
- C.D.BroadbentEvaluating mitigation and calibration techniques for hypothetical bias in choice experimentsJournal of Environmental Planning and Management5712201318311848
- C.D.BroadbentJ.B.GrandyR.P.BerrensTesting for hypothetical bias in a choice experiment using a local public good: Riparian forest restorationInternational Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics19F102010119
- T.A.CameronG.L.PoeR.G.EthierW.D.SchulzeAlternative non-market value-elicitation methods: Are the underlying preferences the same?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management4432002391425
- F.CarlssonP.MartinssonDo hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management4122001179192
- R.T.CarsonT.GrovesIncentive and informational properties of preference questionsEnvironmental and Resource Economics3712007181210
- J.P.CollinsC.A.VosslerIncentive compatibility tests of choice experiment value elicitation questionsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management5822009226235
- R.G.CummingsS.ElliottG.W.HarrisonJ.MurphyAre hypothetical referenda incentive compatible?Journal of Political Economy10531997609621
- R.G.CummingsG.W.HarrisonWas the Ohio court well informed in its assessment of the accuracy of the contingent valuation method?Natural Resources Journal3411994136
- N.HanleyS.MouratoR.E.WrightChoice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuationJournal of Economic Surveys1532001435462
- I.L.JanisVictims of Groupthink1972Houghton MifflinNew York
- I.L.JanisGroupthinkPsychology Today5619718490
- O.Johansson-StenmanH.SvedsaterMeasuring hypothetical bias in choice experiments: The importance of cognitive consistencyB.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy81200818
- O.Johannson_StenmanP.MartinssonHonestly, why are you driving a BMW?Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization6022006129146
- R.J.JohnstonIs hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendumJournal of Environmental Economics and Management5212006469481
- K.J.LancasterConsumer demand: A new approach1971Columbia University PressNew York
- K.J.LancasterA new approach to consumer theoryThe Journal of Political Economy7421966132157
- S.J.LiteJ.C.StrombergSurface water and groundwater thresholds for maintaining Populus–Salix forests San Pedro River, ArizonaBiological Conservation12522005153167
- M.F.LoganThe lessening stream: An environmental history of the Santa Cruz River2002University of Arizona PressTucson, AZ
- J.J.LouviereD.A.HensherJ.D.SwaitStated choice methods: Analysis and applications2000Cambridge University PressCambridge, MA
- L.NormanN.Tallent-HalsellW.LabiosaM.WeberA.McCoyK.HirschboeckDeveloping an ecosystem services online decision support tool to assess the impacts of climate change and urban growth in the Santa Cruz watershed; where we live work, and playSustainability27201020442069
- R.C.ReadyP.A.ChampJ.L.LawtonUsing respondent uncertainty to mitigate hypothetical bias in a stated choice experimentLand Economics8622010363381
- F.SchlapferStated preferences for public services: A classification and survey of approachesJournal of Economic Surveys311201725828010.1111/joes.12140
- L.O.TaylorM.D.MorrisonK.J.BoyleExchange rules and the incentive compatibility of choice experiment’sEnvironmental and Resource Economics472010197220
- B.TellmanG.HuckleberryThe land and the peopleJ.C.StrombergB.J.TellmanEcology and conservation of the San Pedro River2009University of Arizona PressTucson217231 529 pp
- E.ShamirD.M.MekoN.E.GrahamK.P.GeorgakakosHydrologic model framework for water resources planning in the Santa Cruz River, Southern ArizonaJournal of the American Water Resources Association435200711551170
- J.C.StrombergS.J.LiteT.J.RychenerL.R.LevickM.D.DixonJ.M.WattsStatus of the Riparian ecosystem in the upper San Pedro River, Arizona: Application of an assessment modelEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment1152006145173
- J.C.StrombergDynamics of Fremont cottonwood (Popilis fremontii) and saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) Populations along the San Pedro River ArizonaJournal of Arid Environments401998133155
- C.A.VosslerM.DoyonD.RondeauTruth in consequentiality: Theory and field evidence on discrete choice experimentsAmerican Economic Journal: Microeconomics442012145171
- M.A.WeberP.L.RingoldPriority river metrics for residents of an urbanized arid watershedLandscape and Urban Planning13320153752