Determinants of the opinion gap between the elites and the public in the United States*

References

• Aldrich, J. H., & Gelpi, C., & Feaver, P., & Reifler, J., & Sharp, K. T. (2006). Foreign policy and the electoral connection. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 477–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., & de Figueiredo, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2003). Why is there so little money in U.S. politics?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 105–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canes-Wrone, B., & Brady, D. W., & Cogan, J. F. (2004). Out of step, out of office: Electoral accountability and House members’ voting. American Political Science Review, 96, 127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes, N. (2012). Does the numerical underrepresentation of the working class in congress matter?. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37, 5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (CCFR). (2002a). Global views 2002: U.S. leaders topline report. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (CCFR). (2002b). Global views 2002: U.S. public topline report. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (CCFR). (2004a). Global views 2004: U.S. leaders topline report. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (CCFR). (2004b). Global views 2004: U.S. public topline report. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (CCFR). (2004c). Global views 2004: American public opinion and foreign policy. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–264). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Elite and mass foreign policy opinions: Who is leading this parade?. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. (2012). Understanding economic biases in representation: income, resources, and policy representation in the 110th House. Political Research Quarterly, 65, 338–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1989). How the media affect what people think: An information processing approach. Journal of Politics, 51, 347–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. S., & MacKuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2002). The macro polity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, M. (2005). Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 778–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, M. (2009). Preference gaps and inequality in representation. PS: Political Science and Politics, 42, 335–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups: and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 564–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: public policy, political organization: and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States. Politics and Society, 38, 152–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. L., & Wayman, F. W. (1990). Buying time: moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Science Review, 84, 797–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, J. (2008). Who leads, who follows? Re-examining the party–electorate linkages on European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 1127–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., & de Vries, C. E. (2016). Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 1259–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2003). Europe divided? Elites vs. public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 4, 281–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R., & Page, B. I. (2005). Who influences U.S. foreign policy?. American Political Science Review, 99, 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R., & Kalmoe, N. P. (2017). Neither liberal nor conservative: Ideological innocence in the American public. D0: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88, 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, N. M., & Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of inequality and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. (2016). Dark money: The hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right. New York. NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, A. D. (1998). Public opinion and public policy, 1980–1993. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oldendick, R. W., & Bardes, B. A. (1982). Mass and elite foreign policy opinions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 368–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77, 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in American’s policy preferences. B0: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y., & Dempsey, G. R. (1987). What moves public opinion?. American Political Science Review, 81, 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, B. I., & Barabas, J. (2000). Foreign policy gaps between citizens and leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 44, 339–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, D. M., & Brown, C. (2001). Testing the limits of elite influence on public opinion: An examination of sports facility referendums. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 871–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powlick, P. J. (1991). The attitudinal bases for responsiveness for public opinion among American foreign policy officials. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 611–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powlick, P. J. (1995). The sources of public opinion for American foreign policy officials. International Studies Quarterly, 39, 427–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, E., & Wright, G. C. (2013). Political parties and representation of the poor in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 552–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, P. H. (2007). The disconnect between public attitudes and policy outcomes in immigration. In C. Swain (Ed.), Debating immigration (pp. 17–31). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2008). On the limits to inequality in representation. PS: Political Science and Politics, 41, 319–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratmann, T. (2002). Can special interests buy congressional votes? Evidence from financial services legislation. Journal of Law and Economics, 45, 345–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy. (2004). American democracy in an age of rising inequality. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 651–666.
   Google Scholar
• Tichenor, D. J. (2002). Dividing lines: The politics of immigration control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaubel, R. (1994). The public choice analysis of European integration: A survey. European Journal of Political Economy, 10, 227–249.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, J. A., & Page, B. I. (2009). Oligarchy in the United States?. Perspectives on Politics, 7, 731–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origin of mass opinion. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar