276
Views
110
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The LayWel project: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 101-114 | Received 05 Oct 2006, Accepted 14 Nov 2006, Published online: 23 Sep 2019

References

  • ABRAHAMSSON, P. and TAUSON, R. (1997) Effects of group size on performance, health and birds' use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens: Acta Agricultura Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 47: 254–260.
  • APPLEBY M.C. and HUGHES B.O. (1991) Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems; environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. World's Poultry Science Journal 47: 109–128.
  • COOPER, J.J. and ALBENTOSA, M.J. (2003) Behavioural priorities of laying hens. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 14 (3): 127–149.
  • EC (1988) Council Directive 88/166/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens kept in battery cages. Official Journal of the European Communities No. L74: 83–87.
  • EC–ScVC (1996) Report on the Welfare of Laying Hens. Scientific Veterinary Committee Animal Welfare Section. European Commission, DG VI/BII.2, 146 pp.
  • ELSON, H.A. and CROXALL, R.A. (2006) European study on the comparative welfare of laying hens in cage and non-cage systems. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 70(5): 194–198.
  • FLEMING, R.H., McCORMACK, H.A., McTEIR, L. and WHITEHEAD, C.C. (2005) Environmental and genetic effects on osteoclast recruitment in osteoporitic avian bone. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 20: 1307.
  • JONES, R.B. (1996) Fear and adaptability in poultry: insights, implications and imperatives. World's Poultry Science Journal 52: 131–173.
  • KJAER, J.B., FIKS, T., DE JONG, I.C., NICOL, C.J., VAN REENEN, K., REUVEKAMP, B., WEEKS, C.A. and WOLTHUIS-FILLERUP, M. (2005) Final chapter for WP4, deliverable 4.7: Behaviour. In: Report on the LayWel Project, www.LayWel.eu.
  • KNOWLES, T.G. and BROOM, D.M. (1990) The handling and transport of broilers and spent hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 75–91.
  • MILLS, A.D. and WOOD-GUSH, D.G.M. (1985) Pre-laying behaviour in battery cages. British Poultry Science 26: 247–252.
  • NICOL, C.J., BROWN, S.N., GLEN, E., POPE, S.J., SHORT, F.J., WARRISS, P.D., ZIMMERMAN, P.H. and WILKINS, L.J. (2006) Effects of stocking density, flock size and management on the welfare of laying hens in single-tier aviaries. British Poultry Science 47: 135–146.
  • OLSSON, I.A.S. and KEELING, L.J. (2003) No effect of social competition on sham dustbathing in furnished cages laying hens. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 52: 253–256.
  • TAUSON, R. (2005) Management and housing systems for layers – effects on welfare and production. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 479–492.
  • TAUSON, R. and HOLM. K.-E. (2002) Evaluation of Victorsson furnished cage for 8 laying hens according to the 7§ of the Swedish Animal welfare Ordinance and according to the New. Technique Evaluation Program at the Swedish Board of Agriculture. Rapport 251. SLU, Funbo-Lövsta Forskningscenter, 755 97 UPPSALA.
  • TAUSON, R., WAHLSTRÖM, A. and ABRAHAMSSON, P. (1999) Effect of two floor housing systems and cages on health, production, and fear response in layers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 8: 152–159.
  • VAN NIEKERK, T.C.G.M. and REUVENKAMP, B.F.J. (1999) Enriched cages for laying hens. World Poultry 15(12): 34–37.
  • WALL, H. and TAUSON, R. (1999) Hönans utnyttjande av ströbadet i inredda burar. Fjäderfä 8: 34–35.
  • WALL, H. and TAUSON, R. (2002) Egg quality in furnished cages for laying hens – Effects of crack reduction measures and hybrids. Poultry Science 81: 340–348.
  • WEEKS, C.A. and NICOL, C.J. (2006) Preferences of laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 62(2): 296–307.
  • WEITZENBÜRGER, D., VITS, A., HAMANN, H. and DISTL, O. (2005) Effect of small group housing systems and furnished cages on mortality and causes of death in two layer strains. British Poultry Science 46(5): 553–559.
  • WILKINS, L.J., BROWN, S.N., ZIMMERMAN, P.H., LEEB, T. and NICOL, C.J. (2004) Prevalence of keel and furculum damage in laying hens: validation of a palpation method. Veterinary Record 155: 547–550.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.