Laying hen welfare I. Social environment and space

References

• ABRAHAMSSON, P. and TAUSON, R. (1997) Effects of group size on performance, health and birds' use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science 47: 254–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ADAMS, A.W. and CRAIG, J.V. (1985) Effect of crowding and cage shape on productivity and profitability of caged layers: A survey. Poultry Science 64: 238–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALBENTOSA, M.J. and COOPER, J.J. (2004) Effects of cage height and stocking density on the frequency of comfort behaviours performed by laying hens housed in furnished cages. Animal Welfare 13: 419–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALBENTOSA, M.J., COOPER, J.J., LUDDEM, T., REDGATE, S.E., ELSON, H.A. and WALKER, A.W. (2007) Evaluation of the effects of cage height and stocking density on the behaviour of laying hens in furnished cages. British Poultry Science 1: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AL-RAWI, B. and CRAIG, J.V. (1975) Agonistic behaviour of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• AL-RAWI, B., CRAIG, J.V. and ADAMS, A.W. (1976) Agonistic behaviour and egg production of caged layers: genetic strain and group-size effects. Poultry Science 55: 796–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPLEBY, M.C. (2004) What causes crowding? Effects of space, facilities and group size on behaviour, with particular reference to furnished cages for hens. Animal Welfare 13: 313–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPLEBY, M.C., HOGARTH, G.S., ANDERSON, J.A., HUGHES, B.O. and WHITTEMORE, C.T. (1988) Performance of a deep litter system for egg production. British Poultry Science 29: 735–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPLEBY, M.C., WALKER, A.W., NICOL, C.J., LINDBERG, A.C., FREIRE, R., HUGHES, B.O. and ELSON, H.A. (2002) Development of furnished cages for laying hens. British Poultry Science 43: 489–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARNETT, J.L., TAUSON, R., DOWNING, J.A., JANARDHANA, V., LOWENTHAL, J.W., BUTLER, K.L. and CRONIN, G.M. (2009). The effects of a perch, dust bath, and nest box, either alone or in combination as used in furnished cages, on the welfare of laying hens. Poultry Science 88: 456–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAXTER, M.R. (1994) The welfare problem of laying hens in battery cages. Veterinary Record 134: 614–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BROOM, D.M. (1986) Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal 142: 524–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CHANNING, C.E., HUGHES, B.O. and WALKER, A.W. (2001) Spatial distribution and behavior of laying hens housed in an alternative system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 335–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COLLINS, L.M., ASHER, L., PFEIFFER, D.U., BROWNE, W.J. and NICOL, C.J. (2011) Clustering and synchrony in laying hens: The effect of environmental resources on social dynamics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 129: 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOPER, J.J. and ALBENTOSA, M.J. (2003) Behavioural priorities of laying hens. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 14: 127–149.
   Google Scholar
• COOPER, J.J. and ALBENTOSA, M.J. (2004) Social space for laying hens, in: PERRY, G.C. (Ed) Welfare of the Laying Hen, pp. 191–202 (Wallingford Oxfordshire, UK, CABI Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• DAWKINS, M.S. (1982) Elusive concept of preferred group size in domestic hens. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 365–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAWKINS, M.S. and HARDIE, S. (1989) Space needs of laying hens. British Poultry Science 30: 413–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'EATH, R.B. and KEELING, L.J. (2003) Social discrimination and aggression by laying hens in large groups: from peck orders to social tolerance. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84: 197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DUNCAN, I.J.H. (2005) Science-based assessment of animal welfare: farm animals. Revue Scientifique et Technique - Office International des Epizooties 24: 483–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EKLUND, B. and JENSEN, P. (2011) Domestication effects on behavioural synchronization and individual distances in chickens (Gallus gallus). Behavioural Processes 86: 250–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ELSON, H.A. (2004) Effects of stocking density and cage height on health, behaviour, physiology and production of laying hens in enriched cages. Report on UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, project AW0226.
   Google Scholar
• ELSON, H.A. and TAUSON, E. (2012) Furnished cages for laying hens, in: SANDILANDS, V. & HOCKING, P.M. (Eds) Alternative Systems for Poultry - Health, Welfare and Productivity, pp. 190–209 (CAB International, London, UK).
   Google Scholar
• ENGEL, J. M. (2015) The effects of floor space allowance and nest box access on the welfare of caged laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). PhD Dissertation, University of Melbourne, 140 pp.
   Google Scholar
• ESTEVEZ, I., NEWBERRY, R.C. and KEELING, L.J. (2002) Dynamics of aggression in the domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76: 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAURE, J.M. (1991) Rearing conditions and needs for space and litter in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FARM ANIMAL WELFARE COUNCIL (FAWC) (2009) Farm animal welfare in Great Britain: Past, present and future. Farm Animal Welfare Council, London. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/319292/Farm_Animal_Welfare_in_Great_Britain_-_Past__Present_and_Future.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FRASER, D. (2008) Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in its Cultural Context. UFAW Animal Welfare Series. Wiley-Blackwell, Bognor Regis, UK.
   Google Scholar
• FRASER, A.F. and BROOM, D.M. (1997) Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare, 3rd. edn. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• FRASER, D., WEARY, D.M., PAJOR, E.A. and MILLIGAN, B.N. (1997) A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare 6: 187–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GUO, Y.Y., SONG, Z.G., JIAO, Q.Q. and LIN, H. (2012) The effect of group size and stocking density on the welfare and performance of hens housed in furnished cages during summer. Animal Welfare 21: 41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HANSEN, I. (1994) Behavioural expression of laying hens in aviaries and cages: frequencies, time budgets and facility utilisation. British Poultry Science 35: 491–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEMSWORTH, P.H., MELLOR, D.J., CRONIN, G.M. and TILBROOK, A.J. (2015) Scientific assessment of animal welfare. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 63: 24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HESTER, P.Y. (2014) The effect of perches installed in cages on laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 70: 247–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HILL, A.T. (1977) The effects of space allowance and group size on egg production traits and profitability. British Poultry Science 18: 483–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUGHES, B.O. (1983) Space requirements in poultry, in: BAXTER, S.H., BAXTER, M.R. & MACCORMACK, J.A.C. (Eds) Farm Animal Housing and Welfare, pp. 121–128 (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague).
   Google Scholar
• HUNEAU-SALAUN, A., GUINBRETIERE, M., TAKTAK, A., HUONNIC, D. and MICHEL, V. (2011) Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality. Animal 5 (6): 911–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KARCHER, D.M., MAKAGON, M.M., ROBISON, C.I. and TEMPELMAN, R.J. (2014) Assessment of density in enriched colony cages: Production and welfare quality. Poultry Science 93 (E-Suppl. 1): 59.
   Google Scholar
• KEELING, L.J. (1994) Inter-bird distances and behavioural priorities in laying hens: the effect of spatial restriction. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 131–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KEELING, L.J. (1995) Spacing behavior and an ethological approach to assessing optimum space allocations for groups of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KEELING, L.J., ESTEVES, I., NEWBERRY, R.C. and CORREIA, M.G. (2003) Production-related traits of layers reared in different sized flocks: The concept of problematic intermediate group size. Poultry Science 82: 1393–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KOELKEBECK, K.W., AMOSS, M.S.J. and CAIN, J.R. (1987) Production, physiological and behavioural responses of laying hens in different management environments. Poultry Science 66: 397–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAGADIC, H. and FAURE, J.M. (1987) Preferences of domestic hens for cage size and floor types as measured by operant conditioning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19: 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LINDBERG, A.C. (2001) Group life, in: KEELING, L.J. & GONYOU, H.W. (Eds) Social Behaviour in Farm Animals, pp. 37–58 (UK, CABI Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• MENCH, J.A. and BLATCHFORD, R.A. (2014) Determination of space use by laying hens using kinematic analysis. Poultry Science 93: 794–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MENCH, J.A., TIENHOVEN, A., VAN MARSH, J.A., MCCORMICK, C.C., CUNNINGHAM, D.L. and BAKER, R.C. (1986) Effects of cage and floor pen management on behaviour, production and physiological stress responses of laying hens. Poultry Science 65: 1058–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MENCH, J.A. and KEELING, L.J. (2001) The social behaviour of domestic birds, in: KEELING, L.J. & GONYOU, H.W. (Eds) Social Behaviour in Farm Animals, pp. 177–209 (UK, CABI Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J. (1986) Non-exclusive spatial preference in the laying hen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 337–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J. (1987) Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Animal Behaviour 35: 1709–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J., BROWN, S.N., GLEN, E., POPE, S.J., SHORT, F.J., WARRISS, P.D., ZIMMERMAN, P.H. and WILKINS, L.J. (2006) Effects of stocking density, flock size and management on the welfare of laying hens in single-tier aviaries. British Poultry Science 47: 135–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J., GREGORY, N.G., KNOWLES, T.G., PARKMAN, I.D. and WILKINS, L.J. (1999) Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 137–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OIE - WORLD ORGANISATION FOR ANIMAL HEALTH (2010) Terrestrial animal health code. Chapter 7.1. Introduction to the recommendations for animal welfare. Article 7.1.1. Available at http://web.oie.int/eng/normes/mcode/en_chapitre_1.7.1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• PULLIAM, H.R. and CARACO, T. (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? in: ANONYMOUS (Ed) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd ed, pp. 122–147 (Oxford, England, Blackwell Scientific Publications).
   Google Scholar
• RODENBURG, T.B., TUYTTENS, F.A.M., SONCK, B., REU, K.D., HERMAN, L. and ZOONS, J. (2005) Welfare, health, and hygiene of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systems. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 8: 211–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RODENBURG, T.B., VAN KRIMPEN, M.M., DE JONG, I.C., DE HAAS, E.N., KOPS, M.S., RIEDSTRA, B.J., NORDQUIST, R.E., WAGENAAR, J.P., BESTMAN, M. and NICOL, C.J. (2013) The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World's Poultry Science Journal 69: 361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAVORY, C.J., JACK, M.C. and SANDILANDS, V. (2006) Behavioural responses to different floor space allowances in small groups of laying hens. British Poultry Science 47: 120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIBLY, R.M. (1983) Optimal group size is unstable. Animal Behaviour 31: 947–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOHAIL, S.S., BRYANT, M.M. and ROLAND, D.A. (2004) Effect of reducing cage density on performance and economics of second-cycle (force rested) commercial leghorns. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13: 401–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPINKA, M. (2006) How important is natural behaviour in animal farming systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100: 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WALL, H. (2011) Production performance and proportion of nest eggs in layer hybrids housed in different designs of furnished cages. Poultry Science 90: 2153–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WALL, H., TAUSON, R. and ELWINGER, K. (2004) Pop hole passages and welfare in furnished cages for laying hens. British Poultry Science 45: 20–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEITZENBÜRGER, D., VITS, A., HAMANN, H. and DISTL, O. (2005) Effect of furnished small group housing systems and furnished cages on mortality and causes of death in two layer strains. British Poultry Science 46: 553–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIDOWSKI, T.M., CASTON, L.J., HUNNIFORD, M.E., LEESON, S., COOLEY, L., GUERIN, M. and TORREY, S. (2014) Effects of space allowance and cage size on production and well-being of laying hens in furnished cages. Poultry Science 93 (E-Suppl. 1): 71.
   Google Scholar
• WIDOWSKI, T.M., CLASSEN, H., NEWBERRY, R.C., PETRIK, M., SCHWEAN-LARDNER, K., COTTEE, S. and COX, B. (2013) Code of practice for the care and handling of pullets, layers, and spent fowl: poultry (layers): Review of scientific research on priority issues. Poultry (Layer) Code of Practice Scientific Committee, National Farm Animal Care Council, Canada. Available at: https://www.nfacc.ca/resources/codes-of-practice/poultry-layers/Layer_SCReport_2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ZIMMERMAN, P.H., LINDBERG, A.C., POPE, S.J., GLEN, E., BOLHUIS, J.E. and NICOL, C.J. (2006) The effect of stocking density, flock size and modified management on laying hen behaviour and welfare in a non-cage system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101: 111–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar