Rasch Measurement Applied to Young Children

REFERENCES

• AndrichD. (1988a). Distinctions between assumptions and requirements in measurement in the social sciences. In KeatsJ.A., TaftR., HeathR.A., & LovibondS.H. (Eds.), Mathematical and theoretical systems (pp. 1–15). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• AndrichD. (1988b). A general form of Rasch’s extended logistic model for partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(4), 363–378.
   Google Scholar
• AndrichD., & SheridanB., & LuoG. (1996). RUMM (Version 2.6) [Computer software: A Windows program for analysing item response data according to Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Models]. Perth: Measurement Assessment and Evaluation Laboratory, Edith Cowan University.
   Google Scholar
• CampbellS.KOstenE.T., KolobeT.H. A., & FisherA.G. (1993). Development of the test of infant motor performance. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 4(3), 541–550.
   Google Scholar
• ClarkJ.E., & WatkinsD.L. (1984). Static balance in young children. Child Development, 55, 854–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColeE., WoodT.M., & DunnJ.M. (1991). Item response theory: A useful test theory for adapted physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 5,317–332.
   Google Scholar
• DavisW.E. (1984). Motor ability assessment of populations with handicapping conditions: Challenging basic assumptions. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 7, 125–140.
   Google Scholar
• DeOreoK., & KeoghJ. (1980). Performance in fundamental motor tasks. In CorbinC.B. (Ed.), A textbook of motor development (pp. 34–56). Dubuque, IA: Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (1996). Fundamental motor skills: A manual for classroom teachers. Victoria, Australia: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• FisherA.G. (1993). The assessment of IADL motor skills: An application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(4), 319–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarwoodS. (1982). (Mis)use of developmental scales in program evaluation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7(4), 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• GlassG.V. (1978). Standards and criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 75(4), 237–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GutteridgeM. (1939). A study of motor achievements of young children. Archives of Psychology, 244, 1–178.
   Google Scholar
• HandsB., & LarkinD. (in press). Gender bias in measurement of children’s motor skills. The ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal.
   Google Scholar
• HaubenstrickerJ., & SeefeldtV. (1986). Acquisition of motor skills during childhood. In SeefeldtV. (Ed.), Physical activity and well being. Reston, VA: AAHPER.
   Google Scholar
• HendersonS.E. (1987). The assessment of “clumsy” children: Old and new approaches. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25(4), 511–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenryF.M. (1968). Specificity vs. generality in learning motor skill. In BrownR.C. & KenyonG.S. (Eds.), Classical studies on physical activity (pp. 328–331). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• JenkinsL.M. (1930). A comparative study of motor achievements of children of five, six, and seven years of age. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• KeoghJ. (1968). Incidence and severity of awkwardness among regular school boys and educationally subnormal boys. Research Quarterly, 39, 806–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeoghJ., SugdenD., ReynardC, & CalkinsJ. (1979). Identification of clumsy children: Comparisons and comments. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 5, 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• LarkinD., & HoareD. (1991). Out of step: Coordinating kids’ movement. Nedlands, WA: Active Life Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• LaszloJ., & BairstowP. (1985). Perceptual-motor behaviour: Developmental assessment and therapy. New York: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• LudlowL., HaleyS., & GansB. (1992). A hierarchical model of functional performance in rehabilitation medicine. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 75(4), 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaelandA.F. (1992). Identification of children with motor coordination problems. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 330–342.
   Google Scholar
• MilneC, SeefeldtV, & ReuschleinP. (1976). Relationship between grade, sex, race, and motor performance. Research Quarterly, 47(4), 726–730.
   Google Scholar
• MorrisA., WilliamsJ., AtwaterA., & WilmoreJ. (1982). Age and sex differences in motor performances of 3 through 6 year old children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55(3), 214–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PlimptonC.E., & RegimbaiC. (1992). Differences in motor proficiency according to gender and race. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74,399–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PuderbaughJ.K., & FisherA.G. (1992). Assessment of motor and process skills in normal young children and children with dyspraxia. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 72(4), 195–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaschG. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Expanded ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• RaudseppL., & PaasukeM. (1995). Gender differences in fundamental movement patterns, motor performances, and strength measurements in pre-pubertal children. Pediatric Exercise Science, 7, 294–304.
   Google Scholar
• SafritM.J. (1987). The applicability of item response theory to tests of motor behaviour. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58(3), 213–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SafritM.J., ZhuW., CostaM. Glaucia, & ZhangL. (1992). The difficulty of sit-ups tests: An empirical investigation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(3), 277–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScrivenM. (1978). How to anchor standards. Journal of Educational Measurement, 75(4), 273–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheridanB., & HandsB.P. (1993). Measurement of change in attitude to innovations in teaching using graphical techniques for Rasch measurement (2). Perth: Measurement Assessment and Evaluation Laboratory, Edith Cowan University.
   Google Scholar
• SprayJ.A. (1987). Recent developments in measurement and possible applications to the measurement of psychomotor behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58(3), 203–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SnyderS., & SheehanR. (1992). The Rasch measurement model: An introduction. Journal of Early Intervention, 16(1), 87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThomasJ.R., & FrenchK.E. (1985). Gender differences across age in motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 260–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UlrichB.D., & UlrichB.D. (1985). The role of balancing ability in performance of fundamental motor skills in 3,4, and 5 year old children. In ClarkJ.E. & HumphreyJ.H. (Eds.), Motor development and current selected research (Vol. 1, pp. 87–97). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• WerderJ., & BruininksR.H. (1988). Body skills: A motor development curriculum for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• WerderJ., & KalakianL. (1985). Assessment in adapted physical education. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.
   Google Scholar
• WickstromR.L. (1983). Fundamental motor patterns (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsH.G. (1983). Perceptual and motor development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• WilsonJ.G., SilvaP.A., & WilliamsS.M. (1981). The assessment of motor ability in seven year olds. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 7,221–231.
   Google Scholar
• WrightB.D., & StoneM.H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• WrightB.D., & MastersG.N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• ZhuW., & ColeE.L. (1996). Many-faceted Rasch calibration of a gross motor instrument. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(1), 24–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar