Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: NEPA Strategies for Accelerating Project Delivery: Every Day Counts, Tiering, and Alternative Delivery in the I-70 Mountain Corridor

References

• The Collaborative Effort. 2008. Consensus Recommendation. Available at https://www.codot.gov/projects/contextsensitivesolutions/docs/pdfs/ce/collaborative-effort-consensus-recommendation/view (accessed February 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). 2011a. I-70 Mountain Corridor Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Discussion. February.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). 2011b. I-70 Mountain Corridor Record of Decision. June.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). 2011c. I-70 Mountain Corridor PEIS Context Sensitive Solutions. March.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). 2012a. Twin Tunnels Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation. June.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). 2012b. I-70 Frontage Road Improvements Categorical Exclusion. March.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). 2014. Westbound I-70 Twin Tunnels Expansion Project Categorical Exclusion. February.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2011. “23 CFR 627 - Value Engineering.” Government Publication Office, Code of Federal Regulations. April 1. Accessed at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2011-title23-vol1/CFR-2011-title23-vol1-part627.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2012. Shortening Project Delivery Toolkit. Planning and Environmental Linkages and Every Day Counts. Available at http://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/integ/edc.asp (accessed February 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2013a. Shortening Project Delivery Toolkit. Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/projects/toolkit (accessed February 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2013b. Shortening Project Delivery Toolkit. Legal Sufficiency Enhancements. Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/projects/toolkit/enhancements.cfm (accessed February 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2013c. Shortening Project Delivery Toolkit. Expanding Use of Programmatic Agreements. Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/projects/toolkit/programatic.cfm (accessed February 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2013d. 2013 Environmental Excellence Awards: Environmental Streamlining (Every Day Counts). Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/environmental_excellence_awards/eea_2013/page07.cfm (accessed February 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2014. Every Day Counts. EDC 2012 Initiatives: Construction Manager General Contractor. Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/edctwo/2012/cmgc.cfm (accessed February 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2015. Every Day Counts. Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts (accessed February 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Federally Recognized Tribes Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma, Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma, Northern Arapaho Tribe, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Rosebud Sioux Tribe, Southern Ute Indian Tribe, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Ute Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Agency, and White Mesa Ute Tribe. 2004. Programmatic Agreement between Federal Highway Administration, Colorado Department of Transportation, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Federally Recognized Tribes Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma, Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma, Northern Arapaho Tribe, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Rosebud Sioux Tribe, Southern Ute Indian Tribe, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Ute Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Agency, White Mesa Ute Tribe Regarding the Section 106 Tribal Consultation Process for the Interstate 70 Mountain Corridor Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. June.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer. 2008. Programmatic Agreement among Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer, and Colorado Department of Transportation regarding implementation of the Interstate 70 Mountain Corridor Project. March.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, and Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife. 2011a. A Landscape-Level Inventory of Valued Ecosystems (ALIVE) Memorandum of Understanding among the Colorado Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, and Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife. April.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Clear Creek Watershed Foundation, Upper Clear Creek Watershed Association, and Colorado Trout Unlimited. 2011b. Stream and Wetland Ecological Enhancement Program (SWEEP) Memorandum of Understanding. January.
   Google Scholar