Non-Pumped Wells in Backfilled Trenches versus Permeable Reactive Barriers for Containing and Treating Contaminated Groundwater

References

• API (American Petroleum Institute). 1989. Hydrogeologic Database for Groundwater Modeling. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Blowes, D.W., C.J. Ptacek, S.G. Benner, C.W.T. McRae, T.A. Bennett, and R.W. Pul 2000. Treatment of Inorganic Contaminants Using Permeable Reactive Barriers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 45(1):123–137.10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00122-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortone, I., A. Di Nardo, M. Di Natale, A. Erto, D. Musmarra, and G.F. Santonastaso 2013. Remediation of an Aquifer Polluted with Dissolved Tetrachloroethylene by an Array of Wells Filled with Activated Carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials 260:914–920.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byung, L., E. Park, J. Um, K. Lee, J. Jeong, and K. Nam 2013. Release Characteristics of Molasses from a Well-Type Barrier System in Groundwater: A Large Test Tank Study for Nitrate Removal. Environmental Earth Sciences 70(1):167–174.10.1007/s12665-012-2113-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, C.R., C.H. Benson, and G.R. Eykholt 2002. Effects of Heterogeneity on Influent and Effluent Concentration from Horizontal Permeable Reactive Barriers. Water Resources Research 38(8):1152. doi: 10.1029/2001WR001259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. Economic Analysis of the Implementation of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Remediation of Contaminated Ground Water. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, O., J. De Pablo, J.-L. Cortina, C. Ayora, and J. Cama 2010. In situ Removal of Arsenic from Groundwater by Using Permeable Reactive Barriers of Organic Matter/Limestone/Zero-Valent Iron Mixtures. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 32(4):373–378.10.1007/s10653-010-9290-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, T.F., S. Horner, T. McGovern, and B. Davey 2002. An Application of Permeable Reactive Barrier Technology to Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater. Water Research 36(1):15–24.10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00233-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, N., and T.C. Fox 1999. Hydrogeologic Modeling for Permeable Reactive Barriers. Journal of Hazardous Materials 68(1):19–39.10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00030-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsi, P.S., and C.D. Shackelford 2006. An Evaluation of the Influence of Aquifer Heterogeneity on Permeable Reactive Barrier Design. Water Resources Research 42:W03402. doi: 10.1029/2005WR004629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak, P.F. 2007. Mass Transport in Groundwater near Hanging-Wall Interceptors. Journal of Environmental Science and Health 42(3):317–321.10.1080/10934520601144550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak, P.F. 2008. Configuring Passive Wells with Reactive Media for Treating Contaminated Groundwater. Environmental Progress 27(2):257–262.10.1002/ep.10260
   Google Scholar
• Hudak, P.F. 2012. Relative Efficiency of Multi-Transect, Non-Pumped, Reactive Well Networks for Removing Contaminated Groundwater. Toxic and Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering 47(13):2159–2162.10.1080/10934529.2012.696426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak, P.F. 2014. Comparison of Permeable Reactive Barrier, Funnel and Gate, Non-Pumped Wells, and Low-Capacity Wells for Groundwater Remediation. Journal of Environmental Science and Health 49(10):1171–1175.10.1080/10934529.2014.897534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K.C.K., I.M.C. Lo, V. Birkelund, and P. Kjeldsen 2006. Field Monitoring of a Permeable Reactive Barrier for Removal of Chlorinated Organics. Journal of Environmental Engineering 132(2):199–210.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:2(199)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, R.D., R.G. McGregor, D.W. Blowes, S.G. Benner, and K. Mountjoy 2002. A Permeable Reactive Barrier for Treatment of Heavy Metals. Ground Water 40(1):59–66.10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02491.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, B.D.M. 2004. Reactive Barriers: Hydraulic Performance and Design Enhancements. Ground Water 42(4):609–619.10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02629.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, W.D., D.W. Blowes, and J.A. Cherry 2000. Long-Term Performance of in situ Reactive Barriers for Nitrate Remediation. Ground Water 38(5):689–695.10.1111/j.1745-6584.2000.tb02704.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS (US Geological Survey). 1999. Deep Aquifer Remediation Tools (DARTs): A New Technology for Ground-Water Remediation. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 156-99, Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R.D., D.M. Mackay, and J.A. Cherry 1997. Arrays of Unpumped Wells for Plume Migration Control by Semi-Passive in situ Remediation. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, Summer 185–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, C., and P.P. Wang 1999. MT3DMS, a Modular Three-Dimensional Multi-Species Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems; Documentation and User's Guide. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Contract Report SERDP-99-1, Vicksburg, MS.
   Google Scholar