Second Language Developmental Dynamics: How Dynamic Systems Theory Accounts for Issues in Second Language Learning

References

• Brown R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caspi T. , & Lowie W. (2010). A dynamic perspective on L2 lexical development in academic English. In R. Chacón-Beltrán , C. Abello-Contesse , & M.d.M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 41–60). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot K . (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 166–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bot K ., Chan H. , Lowie W. , Plat R. , & Verspoor M. (2012). A dynamic perspective on language processing and development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 188–218.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot K ., & Larsen-Freeman D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M.H. Verspoor , K. de Bot , & W. Lowie (Eds.) A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 5–23). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot K ., Lowie W. , Thorne S. , & Verspoor M. (2013). Dynamic systems theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development. In M. García Mayo , M. Gutierrez Mangado , & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot K ., Lowie W. , & Verspoor M. (2005). Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot K ., Lowie W. & Verspoor M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bot K. , & Makoni S. (2005). Language and aging in multilingual societies: A dynamic approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot K ., Verspoor M. , & Lowie W. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and applied linguistics. The ultimate ‘so what’? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15 (1), 116–118.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis N. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 232–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel A. , Greenspan S. , King B. J. , Lickliter R. , Reygadas P. , Shanker S.G. , & Toren C. (2008). A dynamic systems approach to the life sciences. In A. Fogel , B.J. King , & S.G. Shanker (Eds.), Human development in the twenty-first century: Visionary ideas from systems scientist (pp. 235–253). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert S.H. (2008). Borrowed knowledge: Chaos theory and the challenge of learning across disciplines. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunnen S. , van Dijk M. , Lichtwarck-Aschoff A. , Visser M. , & van Geert P. (2012). The search for variability and change. In S. Kunnen (Ed.) A dynamic systems approach to adolescent development (pp. 53–71). London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 141–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 33–46). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 590–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman D. (2007). On the complementarity of chaos/complexity theory and dynamic systems theory in understanding the second language acquisition process. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 35–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman D. (2012). Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching, 45 (2), 202–214.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman D. , & Cameron L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex system perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 200–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz E. (1963). Deterministic non-periodic flow. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowie W. , Caspi T. , van Geert P. , & Steenbeek H. (2011). Modelling development and change. In M.H. Verspoor , K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 99–121). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza-Pust C. (2008). Dynamic systems theory and universal grammar: Holding up a turbulent mirror to development in grammars. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 250–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid M.S. , Verspoor M. , & MacWhinney B. (2011). Coding and extracting data. In M.H. Verspoor , K. de Bot , & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Selinker L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10 (3), 209–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoelman M. , & Verspoor M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31 (1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderman G. , & Fancher E. (2013). Lexical access in bilinguals and second language learners. In J.W. Schwieter (Ed.), Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism (pp. 267–286). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen E. , & Smith L. (1993). A dynamic systems approach to development: Application. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen E. , & Smith L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen E. , & Smith L. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., vol 1, pp. 563–634). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen E. , & Smith L. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.) Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., vol 1, pp. 258–312). Somerset, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Thewissen J. (2013). Capturing L2 accuracy developmental patterns: Insights from an error- tagged EFL learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97 (S1), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk M ., & van Geert P. (2007). Wobbles, humps, and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity, and variability in early language development. Infant and Child Development, 16, 7–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk M ., Verspoor M. , & Lowie W. (2011). Variability and DST. In M.H. Verspoor , K. de Bot , & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• van Geert P . (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Geert P . (2009). A comprehensive dynamic systems theory of language development. In K. de Bot & R.W. Schrauf (Eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 60–104). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Geert P . (2011). The contribution of complex dynamic systems to development. Child Development Perspectives, 5 (4), 273–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Geert P . (2012). Dynamic systems. In B. Lauren , T. Little , & N. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 725–741). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Geert P ., Steenbeek H. , & Kunnen S. (2012). Monte Carlo techniques: Statistical simulation for developmental data. In S. Kunnen (Ed.), A dynamic systems approach to adolescent development (pp. 43–51). London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Geert P ., & van Dijk M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behaviour and Development, 25, 340–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspoor M. & Behrens H. (2011). Dynamic systems theory and a usage-based approach to second language development. In M.H. Verspoor , K. de Bot , & W. Lowie (Eds.),A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 25–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Verspoor M. , de Bot K. , & Lowie W. (Eds). (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Verspoor M. , Lowie W. , & van Dijk M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 214–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyatkina N. (2012). The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal, 96 (4), 576–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyatkina N. (2013). Specific syntactic complexity: Developmental profiling of individuals based on an annotated learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97 (S1), 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Witherington D. (2007). The dynamic systems approach as metatheory for developmental psychology. Human Development, 50, 127–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar