Australian Validation of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC)

References

• AllikJ., & McCraeR.R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 13–28. doi:10.1177/0022022103260382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BleidornW., & OstendorfF. (2009). Ein Big Five-inventar fur kinder und jugendliche. Die deutsche version des Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). Diagnostica, 55(3), 160–173. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoagS. (2008). A brief history of personality and individual differences research in Australia. In S.Boag (Ed.), Personality down under: Perspectives from Australia (pp. 7–19). Sydney, Australia: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• CaspiA., RobertsB.W., & ShinerR.L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CostaP., & McCraeR. (2011). NEO inventories: Bibliography for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R™) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFM-3). Retrieved from http://www4.parinc.com/WebUploads/samplerpts/NEO%20Biblio%202011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DealJ., HalversonC., MartinR., & BakerS. (2007). The Inventory of Children's Individual Differences: Development and validation of a short version. Journal of Personality, 89(2), 162–166. doi:10.1080/00223890701468550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DearyI. (2009). The trait approach to personality. In P.Corr & G.Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology, (pp. 3–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De ClercqB., RettewD., AlthoffR.R., & De BolleM. (2012). Childhood personality types: Vulnerability and adaptation over time. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(6), 716–722. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De FruytF., De BolleM., McCraeR.R., TerraccianoA., & CostaP.T. (2009). Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence: The NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 in 24 cultures. Assessment, 16(3), 301–311. doi:10.1177/1073191109333760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De FruytF., MervieldeI., & Van LeeuwenK. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16, 57–72. doi:10.1002/per.444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di BlasL., SerafinoF., & De FruytF. (2005). La versione italiana del Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC): Contributo alla validazione e taratura. Evalutiva, 82, 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• FriedmanM., RholesW.S., SimpsonJ.A., BondM., Diaz-LovingR., & ChanC. (2010). Attachment avoidance and the cultural fit hypothesis: A cross-cultural investigation. Personality Relationships, 17, 107–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GruvenM., von RuedenC., MassenkoffM., KaplanH., & Lero VieM. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the Five-Factor Model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 354–370. doi:10.1037/a0030841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HalversonC.F., HavillV.L., DealJ., BakerS.R., VictorJ.B., PavlopoulosV., . . . WenL. (2003). Personality structure as derived from parental ratings of free descriptions of children: The Inventory of Child Individual Differences. Journal of Personality, 71, 995–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HofsteeW.K.B. (2002). The questionnaire construction of personality: Pragmatics of personality assessment. In H.I.Braun, D.N.Jackson & D.E.Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 37–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• HopwoodC.J., & DonnellanM.B. (2013). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), 332–346. doi:10.1177/1088868310361240
   Google Scholar
• JacobsK.E., & CostelloS. (2013). An initial investigation of the Australian adaptation of the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery-II. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 30(1), 84–102. doi:10.1017/edp.2013.9
   Google Scholar
• JohnO.P., NaumannL.P., & SotoC.J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O.P.John, R.W.Robins, & L.A.Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• KohnstammG.A., HalversonC.F., MervieldeI.Jr., & HavillV.L. (1998). Parental descriptions of child personality: Developmental antecedents of the Big Five?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• LaherS. (2010). Using exploratory factor analysis in personality research: Best-practice recommendations. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• LeeK., & AshtonM.C. (2007). Factory analysis in personality research. In R.W.Robins, C.Fraley & R.F.Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 424–443). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-SevaU., & ten BergeJ.M.F. (2006). Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57–64. doi:10.1027/1614-1881.2.2.57
   Google Scholar
• McAdamsD., & PalsJ. (2007). The role of theory in personality research. In R.W.Robins, C.Fraley, & R.F.Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCraeR.R. (2011). Personality theories for the 21st century. Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 209–214. doi:10.1177/0098628311411785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCraeR.R., & CostaP.T.Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G.J.Boyle, G.Matthews, & D.H.Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (vol. 1, pp. 273–294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McCraeR.R., CostaP.T.Jr., & MartinT.A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261–270. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCraeR.R., ZondermanA.B., CostaP.T.Jr., BondM.H., & PaunonenS.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 552–566. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarkeyP.M., MarkeyC.N., & TinsleyB.J. (2004). Children's behavioral manifestations of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 423–432. doi:10.1177/0146167203261886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartinezI., GarciaF., MusituG., & YuberoS. (2012). Family socialization practices: Factor confirmation of the Portugese version of a scale for their measurement. Revista de Psicodidactica, 17(1), 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MervieldeI., & De FruytF. (1999). Construction of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). In I.Mervielde, I.Deary, F.De Fruyt, & F.Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe. Proceedings of the Eight European Conference on Personality Psychology (pp. 107–117)., Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MervieldeI., & De FruytF. (2002). Assessing children's traits with the Hierarchial Personality Inventory for Children. In B.De Raad & M.Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment (pp. 129–142). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• OzerD.J., & Benet-MartinezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PallantJ. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Melbourne, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• PaunonenS.V. (1997). On chance and factor congruence following orthogonal Procrustes rotation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 33–59. doi:10.1177/0013164497057001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RammstedtB., KemperC.J., & BorgI. (2013). Correcting Big Five personality measurements for acquiescence: An 18-country cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality, 27, 71–81. doi:10.1002/per.1894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RossierJ., QuartierV., EnescuR., & IselinA. (2007). Validation of the French version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC): Influence of gender and age on personality traits in 8- to 12-year-olds. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 125–132. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchwartzE.S., ChapmanB.P., DubersteinP.R., Weinstock-GuttmanB., & BenedictR.H.B. (2011). The NEO-FFI in Multiple Sclerosis: Internal consistency, factorial validity, and correspondence between self and informant reports. Assessment, 18(1), 39–49. doi:10.1177/1073191110368482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShinerR., & CaspiA. (2003). Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: Measurement, development, and consequences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(1), 2–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TabachnickB.G., & FidellL.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• TackettJ.L., KushnerS.C., De FruytF., & MervieldeI. (2013). Delineating personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Associations across measures, temperament, and behavioral problems. Assessment, 20, 738–751. doi:10.1177/1073191113509686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TackettJ.L., SlobodskayaH.R., MarR.A., DealJ., HalversonC.F.Jr., BakerS.R., . . . BesevegisE. (2012). The hierarchical structure of childhood personality in five countries: Continuity from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 847–879. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00748.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VassendO., & SkrondalA. (2011). The NEO personality inventory revised (NEO-PI-R): Exploring the measurement structure and variants of the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1300–1304. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VecchioneM., AlessandriG., & BarbaranelliC. (2012). Paper-and-pencil and web-based testing: The measurement invariance of the Big Five personality tests in applied settings. Assessment, 19. doi:10.1177/1073191111419091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VollarthM.E., HampsonS.E., & JuliussonP.B. (2012). Children and eating: Personality and gender are associated with obesogenic food consumption and overweight in 6- to 12-year-olds. Appetite, 58(3), 1113–1117. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.02.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar