Acquiescence Response Bias — Yeasaying and Higher Education

References

• BarrettP. (2005). Person-target profiling. In A.Beauducel et al. (Eds.), Multivariate research strategies: A festschrift for Werner Wittmann (pp. 63–118). Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• BarrettP. (2006). Orthosim 2.01. Auckland NZ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• BartlettM. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 16, 296–298.
   Google Scholar
• BentlerP.M., JacksonD.N., & MessickS. (1971). Identification of content and style: A two dimensional interpretation of acquiescence. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 186–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BillietJ.B., & DavidovE. (2008). Testing the stability of an acquiescence style factor behind two interrelated substantive variables in a panel design. Sociological Methods and Research, 36, 542–562. doi:10.1177/0049124107313901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CatellR. (1966). The scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 1, 245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EysenckS.B.G., & EysenckH.J. (1963). Acquiescence response set in personality questionnaires. Life Sciences, 2, 144–147. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(63)90026-2
   Google Scholar
• HastieT., TibshiraniR., & FriedmanJ. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• HatchS.L., FeinsteinL., LinkB.G., WadsworthM.E.J., & RichardsM. (2007). The continuing benefits of education: Adult education and midlife cognitive ability in the British 1946 birth cohort. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62, S404–S414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HendriksA.A. (1997). The construction of the Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI) (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• HofsteeW.K.B., ten BergeJ.F., & HendriksA.A. (1998). How to score questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 897–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HopwoodC.J., & DonnellanM.B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332–346. doi:10.1177/1088868310361240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacksonP.W., & MessickS. (1965). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality, 33, 309–329. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01389.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JavelineD. (1999). Response effects in polite cultures: A test of acquiescence in Kazakhstan. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 1–28. doi:10.1086/297701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnO.P., NaumannL.P., & SotoC.J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O.P.John, R.W.Robins, & L.A.Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• KaiserH. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaiserH. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LittleR.J.A., & RubinD.B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McCraeR., HerbstJ.H., & CostaP.T. (2001). Effects of acquiescence on personality factors structures. In R.Riemann, F.M.Spinath, & F.Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality and temperament: Genetics, evolution, and structure (pp. 217–231). Berlin, Germany: Pabst Science.
   Google Scholar
• McCraeR., ZondermanA., CostaP., BondM., & PaunonenS. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MeisenbergG., & WilliamsA. (2008). Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education?Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1539–1550. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MessickS., & FrederiksenN. (1958). Ability, acquiescence, and ‘authoritarianism’. Psychological Reports, 4, 687–697. doi:10.2466/pr0.1958.4.3.687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorfM.E., & JacksonD.N. (1972). An analysis of two response styles: True responding and item endorsement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 329–353. doi:10.1177/001316447203200210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MulaikS. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• NunnallyJ.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• PigottT.D. (2001). A review of methods for missing data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 353–383.
   Google Scholar
• RammstedtB., & FarmerR.F. (2013). The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1137–1145. doi:10.1037/a0033323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RammstedtB., GoldbergL.R., & BorgI. (2010). The measurement equivalence of Big-Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 53–61. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RammstedtB., & JohnO.P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RammstedtB., & KemperC.J. (2011). Measurement equivalence of the Big Five: Shedding further light on potential causes of the educational bias. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 121–125. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SonderenE., SandermanR., & CoyneJ.C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Lets learn from cows in the rain. PLoS One, 8, e68967. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SotoC.J., JohnO.P., GoslingS.D., & PotterJ. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718–737. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpearmanC. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StankovL., & LeeJ. (2014). Quest for the best non-cognitive predictor of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 34, 1–8. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.858908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten BergeJ.F. (1986). Rotation to perfect congruence and the cross validation of component weights across populations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 41–64. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2101_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten BergeJ.F., & HofsteeW.K.B. (1999). Coefficients alpha and reliabilities of unrotated and rotated components. Psychometrika, 64, 83–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WatkinsM. (2000). MonteCarlo PCA for parallel analysis. State College, PA: Ed & Psych Associates.
   Google Scholar