The Validation of a Classroom Observation Instrument Based on the Construct of Teacher Adaptive Practice

References

• American Educational Research Association (AERA). (1999). AERA Test Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• AnthonyG., HunterJ., & HunterR. (2015). Prospective teachers development of adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 108–117. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014a). Classroom practice continuum: At a glance. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/classroom-practice/cpc-at-a-glance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014b). Looking at classroom practice. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/classroom-practice/looking_at_clasroom_practice_interactive.pdf?sfvrsn=6
   Google Scholar
• BellC.A., GitomerD.H., McCaffreyD.F., HamreB.K., PiantaR.C., & QiY. (2012). An argument approach to observation protocol validity. Educational Assessment, 17, 62–87. doi:10.1080/10627197.2012.715014
   Google Scholar
• BlackP., & WiliamD. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Bohle CarbonellK., StalmeijerR.E., KöningsK.D., SegersM., & van MerriënboerJ.J.G. (2014). How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise. Educational Research Review, 12, 14–29. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CityE.A., ElmoreR.F., FiarmanS.E., & TeitelL. (2011). Instructional rounds in education. A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• CollieR.J., & MartinA.J. (2016). Teachers’ adaptability and its importance for teachers’ and students’ outcomes. In The Association of Independent Schools of New South Wales (Ed.), The link (pp. 1–2). Sydney, Australia: Association of Independent Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2013). Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards and Learning Progressions for Teachers 1.0: A resource for ongoing teacher development. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.ccsso.org/documents/2013/2013_intasc_learning_progressions_for_teachers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DiRannaK., OsmundsonE., ToppsJ., BarakosL., GearhartM., CerwinK., . . . StrangC. (2008). Assessment-centered teaching: A reflective practice. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• HatanoG., & InagakiK. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H.W. Stevenson , H. Azuma , & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York, NY: WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
   Google Scholar
• HattieJ. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Distinguishing expert teachers from novice and experienced teachers. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on: Building Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• HattieJ. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. Maximising impact on learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HumeA., & CollR.K. (2009). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case studies. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16, 269–290. doi:10.1080/09695940903319661
   Google Scholar
• KlassenR., DurksenT., RowettE., & PattersonF. (2014). Applicant reactions to a situational judgment test used for selection into initial teacher training. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 104–124.
   Google Scholar
• KlenowskiV. (2009). Assessment for Learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16, 263–268. doi:10.1080/09695940903319646
   Google Scholar
• LeahyS., LyonC., ThompsonM., & WiliamD. (2005). Classroom assessment minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63, 18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiemG.A.D., & MartinA.J. (2015). Young people's responses to environmental issues: Exploring the roles of adaptability and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 91–97. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MansellW., JamesM., & The Assessment Reform Group. (2009). Assessment in schools. Fit for purpose? A commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London: ESRC TRLP.
   Google Scholar
• MartinA.J. (2012). Adaptability and learning. In N.M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 90–92). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• MartinA.J., CollieR.J., NejadH., ColmarS., & LiemG.A.D. (2015). Adaptability Scale — Domain specific. Sydney, Australia: Educational Psychology Research Group, University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• MartinA.J., NejadH., ColmarS., & LiemG.A.D. (2012). Adaptability: Conceptual and empirical perspectives on responses to change, novelty and uncertainty. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 22, 58–81. doi:10.1017/jgc.2012.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartinA.J., NejadH., ColmarS., LiemG.A.D., & CollieR.J. (2015). The role of adaptability in promoting control and reducing failure dynamics: A mediation model. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 36–43. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarzanoR.J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• MarzanoR.J. (2007). The art and science of teaching. A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• MossC.M., & BrookhartS.M. (2010). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Department of Education and Training. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW schools: Starting the discussion. Sydney, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• PiantaR.C., & HamreB.K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119. doi:10.3102/0013189x09332374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PiantaR.C., HamreB.K., & MintzS. (2012). Classroom assessment scoring system: Secondary manual. Charlottesville, VA: Teachstone.
   Google Scholar
• SchwartzD.L., BransfordJ.D., & SearsD. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J.P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective, 1–51. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• SmithT., BakerW., HattieJ., & BondL. (2008). A validity study of the certification system of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. In L. Ingvarson & J. Hattie (Eds.), Assessing teachers for professional certification: The first decade of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (pp. 345–380). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• TomlinsonC.A. (2016, September). Differentiation instruction: The challenge leaders can't refuse. Paper presented at the The Australian Council for Educational Leaders Conference, ‘Leadership with Insight and Innovation: Setting the Agenda’, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• VaughnM., & ParsonsS.A. (2013). Adaptive teachers as innovators: Instructional adaptations opening spaces for enhanced literacy learning. Language Arts, 91, 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• VaughnM., & ParsonsS.A. (2016). Toward adaptability: Where to from here? Theory Into Practice, 55, 267–274. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1173998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VaughnM., ParsonsS.A., BurrowbridgeS.C., WeesnerJ., & TaylorL. (2016). In their own words: Teachers’ reflections on adaptability. Theory Into Practice, 55, 259–266. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1173993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WiliamD. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Lincolnshire, IL: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• WiliamD. (2014). Formative assessment of teaching performance. Occasional Paper 137. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Strategic Education.
   Google Scholar
• YoonS.A., Koehler-YomJ., AndersonE., LinJ., & KlopferE. (2015). Using an adaptive expertise lens to understand the quality of teachers’ classroom implementation of computer-supported complex systems curricula in high school science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33, 237–251. doi:10.1080/02635143.2015.1031099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZumboB.D. (2009). Validity as contextualised and pragmatic explanation, and its implication for validation practice. In R.W. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revision, new directions and applications (pp. 65–82). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar