A comparison of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) with clinical assessment in diagnosing mood and anxiety disorders

References

• Reiger D A, Narrow W E, Rae D S. The epidemiology of anxiety disorders: the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) experience. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1990; 24: 3–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichter M M, Narrow W E, Roper M T, et al. Prevalence of mental illness in Germany and the United States. Comparison of the Upper Bavarian Study and the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1996; 184: 1598–1606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells J E, Bushnell J A, Hornblow A R, Joyce P R, Oakley-Browne M A. Christchurch Psychiatric Epidemiology Study Part I. Methodology and lifetime prevalence for specific psychiatric disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1989; 23: 315–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. Mental health and wellbeing profile of adults. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra 1997
   Google Scholar
• Murray C J, Lopez A D. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997; 349: 1436–1442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins L N, Wing J, Wittchen H U, et al. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Archives of General Psychiatry 1988; 45: 1069–1077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins L N, Helzer J E, Croughan J, Ratcliff K S. National Institute of Mental Health diagnostic interview schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry 1988; 38: 381–389
   Google Scholar
• Peters L, Andrews G. Procedural validity of the computerised version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) in the anxiety disorders. Psychological Medicine 1995; 25: 1269–1280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenman S J, Korten A E, Levings C T. Computerised diagnosis in acute psychiatry: validity of CIDI-Auto against routine clinical diagnosis. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1997; 31: 581–592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellsop G, Varghese F, Joshua S, Hicks A. The reliability of Axis II of DSM-III. American Journal of Psychiatry 1982; 139: 1360–1361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer R L, Fleiss J L. A re-analysis of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 1974; 125: 341–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck A T. Reliability of psychiatric diagnoses: 1. A critique of systematic studies. American Journal of Psychiatry 1962; 119: 210–216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer R L, Williams J B. Revised diagnostic criteria and a new structured interview for diagnosing anxiety disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1988:; 22(Suppl. 1)55–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 3rd edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington 1980
   Google Scholar
• Erdman H P, Klein M H, Greist J H. Direct patient computer interviewing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1985; 53: 760–773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blouin A G, Perez E Z, Blouin J H. Computerized administration of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Psychiatry Research 1988; 23: 335–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobak K A, Reynolds W M, Griest J H. Computerized and clinical assessment of depression and anxiety: respondent evaluation and satisfaction. Journal of Personality Assessment 1994; 63: 171–180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenman S J, Levings C T, Korten A E. Clinical utility and patient acceptance of the computerised Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Psychiatric Services 1997; 48: 815–820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. CIDI-Auto, Version 2.1: Administrator's Guide. World Health Organization, Sydney 1997
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. World Health Organization, Geneva 1993
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington 1994
   Google Scholar
• Wittchen H U. Reliability and validity studies of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). A critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1994; 28: 57–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove W M, Andreasen N C, McDonald-Scott P, Keller M B, Shapiro R W. Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis: theory and practice. Archives of General Psychiatry 1981; 38: 408–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman D G. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Peters L. The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1998; 33: 80–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins L N. Epidemiology: reflections on testing the validity of psychiatric interviews. Archives of General Psychiatry 1985; 42: 918–924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar